World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6499 6052 3516 3193 105 6103

Catherine E. Mosher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Catherine E. Mosher between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Catherine E. Mosher published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2018. 6 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2018. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Catherine E. Mosher: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 7
2006 4
2007 3
2008 5
2009 2
2010 8
2011 3
2012 4
2013 8
2014 5
2015 5
2016 8
2017 8
2018 9
2019 4
2020 5
2021 9
2022 4
2023 7
2024 4
2025 5
2026 1
Total 120
Download as CSV

Catherine E. Mosher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine E. Mosher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 105
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Catherine E. Mosher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine E. Mosher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Catherine E. Mosher is affiliated with Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with particular focus on Oncology, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, as well as Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses various topics, notably:

  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Music Therapy and Health

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Psycho-Oncology
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Among the recent papers that feature their contributions are:

  • "Self-efficacy and HPV Vaccine Attitudes Mediate the Relationship Between Social Norms and Intentions to Receive the HPV Vaccine Among College Students" (2020) published in Journal of Community Health
  • "Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on fatigue in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" (2021) published in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
  • "Examining Health Behaviors of Chronic Disease Caregivers in the U.S." (2021) published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • "Acceptance and commitment therapy for patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden in advanced gastrointestinal cancer: Results of a pilot randomized trial" (2022) published in Palliative Medicine
  • "Symptom experiences in post-treatment cancer survivors: associations with acceptance and commitment therapy constructs" (2020) published in Supportive Care in Cancer

The scientist frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Shelley A. Johns
  • Ekin Seçinti
  • Wei Wu
  • Ellen Krueger
  • Victoria L. Champion

Best Publications

  • Physical, psychological, and social sequelae following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a review of the literature

    Catherine E. Mosher;William H. Redd;Christine Marie Rini;Jack E. Burkhalter

  • Associations between lifestyle factors and quality of life among older long‐term breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors

    Catherine E. Mosher;Richard Sloane;Miriam C. Morey;Miriam C. Morey;Denise Clutter Snyder

  • Addiction to indoor tanning: relation to anxiety, depression, and substance use.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Sharon Danoff-Burg

  • Relations of meaning in life and sense of coherence to distress in cancer patients: a meta‐analysis

    Joseph G. Winger;Rebecca N. Adams;Catherine E. Mosher

  • Randomized Clinical Trial of Telephone-Administered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Distress Symptoms After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

    Katherine N. DuHamel;Catherine E. Mosher;Gary Winkel;Larissa E. Labay

  • Perceived Racial Discrimination, Social Support, and Psychological Adjustment Among African American College Students

    Unknown

  • Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Physical, Psychological, and Social Sequelae

    Catherine E. Mosher;Courtney Johnson;Maura Dickler;Larry Norton

  • Quality of life concerns and depression among hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors

    Catherine E. Mosher;Katherine N. Duhamel;Christine Marie Rini;Geoffrey Corner

  • Physical Health, Mental Health, and Life Changes Among Family Caregivers of Patients With Lung Cancer

    Catherine E. Mosher;Tamilyn Bakas;Victoria L. Champion

  • The relationship between acceptance of cancer and distress: A meta-analytic review.

    Ekin Secinti;Danielle B. Tometich;Shelley A. Johns;Catherine E. Mosher

  • Mental health outcomes during colorectal cancer survivorship: a review of the literature.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Joseph G. Winger;Barbara A. Given;Paul R. Helft

  • Effectiveness of partner social support predicts enduring psychological distress after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

    Christine Marie Rini;William H. Redd;Jane Austin;Catherine E. Mosher

  • Family Caregiving Challenges in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives

    Catherine E. Mosher;Rebecca N. Adams;Paul R. Helft;Bert H. O’Neil

  • Indoor tanning, mental health, and substance use among college students: The significance of gender

    Catherine E. Mosher;Sharon Danoff-Burg

  • Self-efficacy for coping with cancer in a multiethnic sample of breast cancer patients: associations with barriers to pain management and distress.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Katherine N. DuHamel;Jennifer Egert;Meredith Y. Smith

  • An examination of distress, sleep, and fatigue in metastatic breast cancer patients.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Katherine N. DuHamel

  • Coping with physical and psychological symptoms: a qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Mary A. Ott;Nasser Hanna;Shadia I. Jalal

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy for symptom interference in metastatic breast cancer patients: a pilot randomized trial

    Catherine E. Mosher;Ekin Secinti;Ruohong Li;Adam T. Hirsh

  • An experimental investigation of the relationships among race, prayer, and pain.

    Samantha M Meints;Samantha M Meints;Catherine Mosher;Kevin L Rand;Leslie Ashburn-Nardo

  • Psychosocial adjustment of family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors

    Stephanie Ross;Catherine E. Mosher;Victor Ronis-Tobin;Sandy Hermele

  • Self-efficacy and HPV Vaccine Attitudes Mediate the Relationship Between Social Norms and Intentions to Receive the HPV Vaccine Among College Students

    Madison E Stout;Madison E Stout;Shannon M Christy;Shannon M Christy;Joseph G Winger;Susan T Vadaparampil

  • Long-term outcomes of the FRESH START trial: exploring the role of self-efficacy in cancer survivors' maintenance of dietary practices and physical activity.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Isaac Lipkus;Richard Sloane;Denise C. Snyder

  • Randomized Pilot Trial of a Telephone Symptom Management Intervention for Symptomatic Lung Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers

    Catherine E. Mosher;Joseph G. Winger;Nasser Hanna;Shadia I. Jalal

  • Change in self-efficacy partially mediates the effects of the FRESH START intervention on cancer survivors' dietary outcomes.

    Catherine E. Mosher;Bernard F. Fuemmeler;Richard Sloane;William E. Kraus

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried University of Alabama at Birmingham
Katherine N. DuHamel
Katherine N. DuHamel Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lawrence H. Einhorn
Lawrence H. Einhorn Indiana University
Kathy D. Miller
Kathy D. Miller Indiana University
Barbara A. Given
Barbara A. Given Michigan State University
Christine Rini
Christine Rini Northwestern University
William H. Redd
William H. Redd Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jamie S. Ostroff
Jamie S. Ostroff Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jonathan B. Bricker
Jonathan B. Bricker Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA unlocks diverse educational and career opportunities. For many students, finding affordable programs is a top priority. Fortunately, you can explore options in various regions with programs that balance quality and cost.

If you’re considering studies in the Southeast, our guide to the cheapest psychology degrees in North Carolina highlights institutions offering great value. North Carolina offers several accredited programs at public universities with competitive tuition.

For those interested in urban settings, New York presents multiple affordable choices. Review our list of the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York City to find flexible online and on-campus options. Similarly, learners in the tri-state area can take advantage of affordable psychology programs in New Jersey, which include both public and private colleges.

If your focus is statewide, you can explore the cheapest psychology degrees in New York, with institutions providing flexible online degrees ideal for working adults and career changers.

Earning a psychology degree can open pathways in counseling, human resources, mental health services, education, and research. Exploring these affordable programs can lower your financial burden and help launch a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine E. Mosher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles