World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
3483
World Ranking
9490
National Ranking
361

C. P. Meyer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. P. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

C. P. Meyer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. P. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. P. Meyer is affiliated with CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research in Australia. Their research predominantly focuses on environmental and earth sciences, with an emphasis on the interface between natural ecosystems and atmospheric processes.

Their main fields of study include Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Meyer's work spans several subfields, notably Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, and Forestry. This broad spectrum of specialties reflects an interdisciplinary approach to understanding environmental dynamics.

The scientist's primary research topics are diverse and include Fire effects on ecosystems, Forest ecology and management, Tree-ring climate responses, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Plant responses to elevated CO2, Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems, and Fire dynamics and safety research. These topics suggest a strong focus on how fire interacts with various ecological and atmospheric systems and their broader environmental implications.

Recent scholarly publications by Meyer illustrate this focus. Notable papers include:

  • Multi-decadal increase of forest burned area in Australia is linked to climate change, 2021, published in Nature Communications
  • Standing dead trees contribute significantly to carbon budgets in Australian savannas, 2020, International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • Simplifying emissions modelling from wildland fires: laboratory-scale emission factors are independent of fine woody debris fuel load, 2025, International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • Data associated with the publication "Multi-decadal increase of forest burned area in Australia is linked to climate change", 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Author Correction: Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates, 2023, Nature Communications

Meyer frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field, including Garry D. Cook, Josep G. Canadell, Andrew Dowdy, Peter Briggs, and Jürgen Knauer. These co-authors are recurrent contributors to studies that explore fire ecology, carbon budgeting, and atmospheric interactions in wildland environments.

Their work is often published in specific venues tailored to their scientific niche. The most frequent publication platforms include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature Communications, and the International Journal of Wildland Fire. These venues reflect a focus on interdisciplinary environmental science with strong emphasis on fire ecology and atmospheric science.

Best Publications

  • Long-term changes in tropospheric ozone

    S.J. Oltmans;A.S. Lefohn;J.M. Harris;I. Galbally

  • Fire in the Air: Biomass Burning Impacts in a Changing Climate

    Melita Keywood;Maria Kanakidou;Andreas Stohl;Frank Dentener

  • Trends of ozone in the troposphere

    S. J. Oltmans;A. S. Lefohn;H. E. Scheel;J. M. Harris

  • Improving estimates of savanna burning emissions for greenhouse accounting in northern Australia: limitations, challenges, applications

    Jeremy Russell-Smith;Brett P. Murphy;C. P. Meyer;C. P. Meyer;Garry D. Cook;Garry D. Cook

  • The Australian terrestrial carbon budget

    V. Haverd;M. R. Raupach;P. R. Briggs;J. G. Canadell.

  • Evidence for photochemical control of ozone concentrations in unpolluted marine air

    G. P. Ayers;S. A. Penkett;R. W. Gillett;B. Bandy

  • Soil-Atmosphere Trace Gas Exchange in Semiarid and Arid Zones

    Ian E. Galbally;Ian E. Galbally;Wayne V. Kirstine;C. P. (Mick) Meyer;C. P. (Mick) Meyer;Ying Ping Wang;Ying Ping Wang

  • A study of peroxy radicals and ozone photochemistry at coastal sites in the northern and southern hemispheres

    Lucy J. Carpenter;Paul S. Monks;Brian J. Bandy;Stuart A. Penkett

  • Impact of biomass burning sources on seasonal aerosol air quality

    Fabienne Reisen;C.P. (Mick) Meyer;Melita D. Keywood

  • Fundamental ozone photochemistry in the remote marine boundary layer: the soapex experiment, measurement and theory

    Paul S. Monks;Lucy J. Carpenter;Stuart A. Penkett;Gregory P. Ayers

  • The Annual Cycle of Peroxides and Ozone in Marine Air at Cape Grim, Tasmania

    G. P. Ayers;S. A. Penkett;R. W. Gillett;B. Bandy

  • Mid‐latitude marine boundary‐layer ozone destruction at visible sunrise observed at Cape Grim, Tasmania, 41°S

    Ian E. Galbally;Simon T. Bentley;C. P. (Mick) Meyer

  • Impact of smoke from prescribed burning: Is it a public health concern?

    Anjali Haikerwal;Fabienne Reisen;Malcolm Ross Sim;Michael John Abramson

  • Exposure to bushfire smoke during prescribed burns and wildfires: Firefighters' exposure risks and options

    Fabienne Reisen;Dane Hansen;C.P. (Mick) Meyer

  • Relationships between ozone photolysis rates and peroxy radical concentrations in clean marine air over the Southern Ocean

    S. A. Penkett;P. S. Monks;L. J. Carpenter;K. C. Clemitshaw

  • Impact of smoke from biomass burning on air quality in rural communities in southern Australia

    Fabienne Reisen;C.P. (Mick) Meyer;Lachie McCaw;Jennifer C. Powell

  • Atmospheric mercury emissions in Australia from anthropogenic, natural and recycled sources

    Peter F. Nelson;Anthony L. Morrison;Hugh J. Malfroy;Martin Cope

  • Ground-Based Field Measurements of PM2.5 Emission Factors From Flaming and Smoldering Combustion in Eucalypt Forests

    F. Reisen;C. P. Meyer;C. J. Weston;L. Volkova

  • Greenhouse gas emissions from laboratory-scale fires in wildland fuels depend on fire spread mode and phase of combustion

    N. C. Surawski;A. L. Sullivan;C. P. Meyer;S. H. Roxburgh

  • When smoke comes to town: The impact of biomass burning smoke on air quality

    Melita Keywood;Martin Cope;C.P. Mick Meyer;Yoshi Iinuma

  • Emission factors for PCDD/PCDF and dl-PCB from open burning of biomass

    R. R. Black;C. P. Meyer;A. Touati;B. K. Gullett

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian E. Galbally
Ian E. Galbally Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Ying-Ping Wang
Ying-Ping Wang Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Melita Keywood
Melita Keywood Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Stuart A. Penkett
Stuart A. Penkett University of East Anglia
Jochen F. Mueller
Jochen F. Mueller University of Queensland
Lucy J. Carpenter
Lucy J. Carpenter University of York
Garry D. Cook
Garry D. Cook Arafurica Pty Ltd
Paul S. Monks
Paul S. Monks University of Leicester
Peter Simmonds
Peter Simmonds University of Oxford
Lukas Van Zwieten
Lukas Van Zwieten New South Wales Department of Primary Industries

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences or exploring related fields, there are numerous flexible online degree options available. For example, educators looking to enhance their expertise can consider advanced programs like eds to edd program, which focus on leadership and research skills essential for environmental education roles.

Social work plays a critical role in community-based environmental initiatives, making degrees such as dsw online programs especially relevant for professionals aiming to influence environmental justice and policy.

Students seeking a broader interdisciplinary approach might benefit from enrolling in a low cost online general studies degree. This option offers a versatile path to integrate environmental science with other fields, often at an accessible price point.

Additionally, for those starting their academic journey or balancing responsibilities, identifying the easiest bachelor's degree programs can provide a manageable entry point into environmental careers without compromising quality education.

Best Scientists Citing C. P. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles