World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael A. Andrykowski

Michael A. Andrykowski

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
22496
World Ranking
16720
National Ranking
8388

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
21188
World Ranking
1656
National Ranking
980

Michael A. Andrykowski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Andrykowski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael A. Andrykowski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Andrykowski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Andrykowski is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Medicine and Social Sciences, with a particular emphasis on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's main topics of work include cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, cancer survivorship and care, family support in illness, digital mental health interventions, multiple and secondary primary cancers, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, and the intersection of religion, spirituality, and psychology.

Michael A. Andrykowski has published in several venues, notably:

  • Cancer Medicine
  • Cancer
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Oncology nursing forum

Their recent papers include:

  • Results from a randomized controlled trial testing StressProffen; an application-based stress-management intervention for cancer survivors, 2020, Cancer Medicine
  • Digital stress management in cancer: Testing StressProffen in a 12-month randomized controlled trial, 2021, Cancer
  • Distress and mental health care and medication use among survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses: Findings from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey, 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • Experiences of Muslim Cancer Survivors Living in the United States, 2021, Oncology nursing forum
  • Back Cover, 2020, Cancer Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michael A. Andrykowski include:

  • Elin Børøsund
  • Shawna L. Ehlers
  • Matthew M. Clark
  • Lise Solberg Nes
  • Cecilie Varsi

Best Publications

  • Psychometric evaluation of the pittsburgh sleep quality index

    Janet S. Carpenter;Michael A. Andrykowski

  • Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: a controlled comparison study.

    Matthew J. Cordova;Lauren L. C. Cunningham;Charles R. Carlson;Michael A. Andrykowski

  • Short Form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-SF): Psychometric Information.

    Shelly L. Curran;Michael A. Andrykowski;Jamie L. Studts

  • Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer

    Kevin D. Stein;Kevin D. Stein;Karen L. Syrjala;Karen L. Syrjala;Michael A. Andrykowski

  • Frequency and correlates of posttraumatic-stress-disorder-like symptoms after treatment for breast cancer.

    Matthew J. Cordova;Michael A. Andrykowski;Daniel E. Kenady;Patrick C. McGrath

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder after treatment for breast cancer : Prevalence of diagnosis and use of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) as a screening instrument

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Matthew J. Cordova;Jamie L. Studts;Thomas W. Miller

  • Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life, Growth, and Spiritual Well-Being After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Michelle M. Bishop;Elizabeth A. Hahn;David F. Cella

  • Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: Cancer as a psychosocial transition

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Jean W. Hunt

  • PSYCHOMETRICS FOR TWO SHORT FORMS OF THE CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES± DEPRESSION SCALE

    Janet S. Carpenter;Michael A. Andrykowski;John Wilson;Lynne A. Hall

  • Positive and negative psychosocial sequelae of bone marrow transplantation: implications for quality of life assessment.

    Kathleen Fromm;Michael A. Andrykowski;Jean Hunt

  • Factors Associated with PTSD Symptoms Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Test of the Andersen Model

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Mathew J. Cordova

  • Off-Treatment Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Controlled Comparison

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Shelly L. Curran;Robin Lightner

  • Social constraints, cognitive processing, and adjustment to breast cancer.

    Matthew J. Cordova;Lauren L. C. Cunningham;Charles R. Carlson;Michael A. Andrykowski

  • Hot flashes in postmenopausal women treated for breast carcinoma: prevalence, severity, correlates, management, and relation to quality of life.

    Janet S. Carpenter;Michael A. Andrykowski;Matthew Cordova;Lauren Cunningham

  • Posttraumatic growth and PTSD symptomatology among colorectal cancer survivors: a 3-month longitudinal examination of cognitive processing.

    John M. Salsman;Suzanne C. Segerstrom;Emily H. Brechting;Charles R. Carlson

  • Stability and change in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms following breast cancer treatment: a 1-year follow-up.

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Matthew J. Cordova;Patrick C. Mcgrath;David A. Sloan

  • Late Effects of Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation on Spouses or Partners Compared With Survivors and Survivor-Matched Controls

    Michelle M. Bishop;Jennifer L. Beaumont;Elizabeth A. Hahn;David Cella

  • Psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women with breast cancer and benign breast problems : A controlled comparison

    Michael A. Andrykowski;Shelly L. Curran;Jamie L. Studts;Lauren Cunningham

  • Symptom structure of PTSD following breast cancer

    Matthew J. Cordova;Jamie L. Studts;Danette M. Hann;Paul B. Jacobsen

  • Self-transformation as a factor in the self-esteem and well-being of breast cancer survivors

    Janet S. Carpenter;Dorothy Y. Brockopp;Michael A. Andrykowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul B. Jacobsen
Paul B. Jacobsen National Institutes of Health
Brent J. Small
Brent J. Small University of South Florida
William H. Redd
William H. Redd Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
John R. Wingard
John R. Wingard University of Florida
John M. Salsman
John M. Salsman Wake Forest University
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Sharon L. Manne
Sharon L. Manne Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Charles R. Carlson
Charles R. Carlson University of Kentucky
Howard Leventhal
Howard Leventhal Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Mary M. Horowitz
Mary M. Horowitz Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Students interested in blending their passion for helping others with flexible learning can consider popular counseling programs and psychology degrees available entirely online.

Many universities in different states offer specialized programs that cater to various interests, such as the popular counseling degrees in Texas and popular counseling degrees in Utah. For a broader overview, you can explore popular counseling programs in the US, which highlight respected institutions and emerging trends in the field nationwide.

Prospective students should also consider program value and long-term career opportunities. For instance, most valuable counseling degrees in Arizona are recognized for strong graduate outcomes and competitive salaries. By comparing these options, you can select a pathway that matches your goals and lifestyle, while ensuring you gain the relevant qualifications to advance in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Andrykowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles