World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Linda K. George

Linda K. George

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 109 924 881 562 531 291 51005
Psychology 108 424 373 270 233 279 52153
Medicine 104 6965 6552 3665 3399 252 48189

Linda K. George publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda K. George between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda K. George published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1998. 10 of the 311 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1998. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1976 2025

311 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda K. George: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 3
1978 2
1979 4
1980 6
1981 6
1982 9
1983 3
1984 8
1985 10
1986 10
1987 8
1988 10
1989 14
1990 10
1991 10
1992 7
1993 12
1994 15
1995 7
1996 7
1997 8
1998 17
1999 8
2000 4
2001 6
2002 8
2003 8
2004 2
2005 6
2006 3
2007 1
2008 6
2009 1
2010 3
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 6
2015 7
2016 3
2017 1
2018 5
2019 2
2020 4
2021 1
2022 4
2023 6
2024 5
2025 5
Total 311
Download as CSV

Linda K. George publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda K. George sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 279 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 279
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda K. George D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda K. George sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24 108
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Linda K. George is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Within these fields, their work extensively covers subfields including Genetics, General Health Professions, Agronomy and Crop Science, Health, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Livestock Management and Performance Improvement
  • Hemophilia Treatment and Research
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Linda K. George has contributed to multiple recent publications, including the following papers:

  • Genetic improvement of economic traits in Murrah buffalo using significant SNPs from genome-wide association study, 2023, Tropical Animal Health and Production
  • Rising childhood income inequality and declining Americans' health, 2022, Social Science & Medicine
  • Genomic clues of association between clinical mastitis and SNPs identified by ddRAD sequencing in Murrah buffaloes, 2023, Animal Biotechnology
  • Understanding the health decline of Americans in boomers to millennials, 2023, Social Science & Medicine
  • Estimation of genetic parameters of growth traits for direct and maternal effects in Murrah buffalo, 2022, Tropical Animal Health and Production

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Linda K. George include:

  • Rani Alex
  • Nidhi Sukhija
  • Komal Jaglan
  • Vikas Vohra
  • Archana Verma

The common publication venues where Linda K. George's work appears most frequently include:

  • Tropical Animal Health and Production
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Animal Biotechnology
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Indian Journal of Animal Research

Best Publications

  • Caregiver well-being : a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults

    Linda K. George;Lisa P. Gwyther

  • One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States. Based on five Epidemiologic Catchment Area sites.

    Darrel A. Regier;Jeffrey H. Boyd;Jack D. Burke;Donald S. Rae

  • Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey

    W. E. Broadhead;D. G. Blazer;L. K. George;Chiu Kit Tse

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder in the community: an epidemiological study

    Jonathan R. T. Davidson;Dana Hughes;Dana G. Blazer;Linda K. George

  • Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health.

    Linda K. George;Christopher G. Ellison;David B. Larson

  • Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community

    Christopher G. Ellison;Linda K. George

  • Spirituality and Health: What We Know, What We Need to Know

    Linda K. George;David B. Larson;Harold G. Koenig;Michael E. McCullough

  • The Epidemiology of Depression in an Elderly Community Population

    Dan Blazer;Dana C. Hughes;Linda K. George

  • Religiosity and Remission of Depression in Medically Ill Older Patients

    Harold G. Koenig;Linda K. George;Bercedis L. Peterson

  • Social support and the outcome of major depression.

    Linda K. George;Dan G. Blazer;Dana C. Hughes;Nancy Fowler

  • Sociological Perspectives on Life Transitions

    Linda K. George

  • The association of age and depression among the elderly: an epidemiologic exploration.

    Dan G. Blazer;Bruce Burchett;Linda K. George

  • Measuring multiple dimensions of religion and spirituality for health research: Conceptual background and findings from the 1998 General Social Survey

    Ellen L. Idler;Marc A. Musick;Christopher G. Ellison;Linda K. George

  • Exclusion Criteria of DSM-III: A Study of Co-occurrence of Hierarchy-Free Syndromes

    Jeffrey H. Boyd;Jack D. Burke;Ernest Gruenberg;Charles E. Holzer

  • The Use of Religion and Other Emotion-Regulating Coping Strategies Among Older Adults

    Harold G. Koenig;Linda K. George;Ilene C. Siegler

  • The epidemiology of social phobia: findings from the Duke Epidemiological Catchment Area Study

    Jonathon R. Davidson;D. L. Hughes;Linda K. George;Dan G. Blazer

  • Predictors of Institutionalization Among Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

    Elizabeth J. Colerick;Linda K. George

  • Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals.

    Harold G. Koenig;Ron E. Westlund;Linda K. George;Dana C. Hughes

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life

    Arnold J. Friedhoff;James Ballenger;Alan S. Bellack;William T. Carpenter

  • Cardiovascular and Behavioral Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training in Healthy Older Men and Women

    James A. Blumenthal;Charles F. Emery;David J. Madden;Linda K. George

  • The social psychology of health.

    Linda K. George

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan G. Blazer
Dan G. Blazer Duke University
Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig Duke University
Marvin S. Swartz
Marvin S. Swartz Duke University
Ilene C. Siegler
Ilene C. Siegler Duke University
Gerda G. Fillenbaum
Gerda G. Fillenbaum Duke University
Carl F. Pieper
Carl F. Pieper Duke University
Kenneth E. Schmader
Kenneth E. Schmader Duke University
Morris A. Okun
Morris A. Okun Arizona State University
Yi Zeng
Yi Zeng Peking University
Harvey J. Cohen
Harvey J. Cohen Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a diverse field that opens doors to numerous career opportunities. Many graduates consider closely related professions, such as social work, which offers impactful roles in helping individuals and communities thrive. For those interested in this pathway, there are several highly regarded programs nationwide.

Students seeking strong regional options can explore the best social work programs in Utah or look into the top social work programs in Virginia. Both states offer accredited degrees well-suited for psychology graduates aiming to diversify their expertise.

Additionally, those considering study in the Appalachian region may appreciate the best social work degree programs in West Virginia, which are designed to support varied career aspirations in social services and mental health.

For those looking to advance their qualifications quickly and conveniently, online education is an attractive route. Check out the easiest online social work doctorate degrees in the US for flexible doctoral options that integrate well with professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Linda K. George

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles