World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5667
World Ranking
11642
National Ranking
4775

Thomas M. Conte publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Conte sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 207 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas M. Conte D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Conte sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Conte is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields and subfields within computing and engineering, focusing particularly on areas related to hardware architecture and parallel computing.

Their recent publications cover several topics and were published in notable venues. Key papers include:

  • A vision to compute like nature, 2021, Communications of the ACM
  • IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
  • "Smarter" NICs for faster molecular dynamics: a case study, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)
  • Programming Strategies for Irregular Algorithms on the Emu Chick, 2020, ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing
  • Scalable Energy-Efficient Microarchitectures With Computational Error Tolerance Via Redundant Residue Number Systems, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Computers

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Thomas M. Conte include:

  • Christina Schober
  • Forrest Shull
  • William Gropp
  • Riccardo Mariani
  • Melissa Russell

The scientist's work appears regularly in prominent publication venues such as:

  • IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
  • IEEE Spectrum
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • Communications of the ACM

Thomas M. Conte's research fields and subfields of study include:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Their research focuses on several main topics, such as:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Semiconductor materials and devices
  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications

Best Publications

  • Adaptive mode control: A static-power-efficient cache design

    Huiyang Zhou;Mark C. Toburen;Eric Rotenberg;Thomas M. Conte

  • Optimization of instruction fetch mechanisms for high issue rates

    Thomas M. Conte;Kishore N. Menezes;Patrick M. Mills;Burzin A. Patel

  • Reducing state loss for effective trace sampling of superscalar processors

    T.M. Conte;M.A. Hirsch;K.N. Menezes

  • Unified assign and schedule: a new approach to scheduling for clustered register file microarchitectures

    Emre Özer;Sanjeev Banerjia;Thomas M. Conte

  • A Benchmark Characterization of the EEMBC Benchmark Suite

    J.A. Poovey;T.M. Conte;M. Levy;S. Gal-On

  • PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS

    James D. Isaak;Sorel Reisman;Jeffrey M. Voas;Elizabeth L. Burd

  • Enhancing memory-level parallelism via recovery-free value prediction

    H. Zhou;T.M. Conte

  • Configurable string matching hardware for speeding up intrusion detection

    Monther Aldwairi;Thomas Conte;Paul Franzon

  • Challenges to combining general-purpose and multimedia processors

    T.M. Conte;P.K. Dubey;M.D. Jennings;R.B. Lee

  • Performance analysis and its impact on design

    P. Bose;T.M. Conte

  • Instruction fetch mechanisms for VLIW architectures with compressed encodings

    Thomas M. Conte;Sanjeev Banerjia;Sergei Y. Larin;Kishore N. Menezes

  • Touch screen with tactile feedback

    Thomas M. Conte;Bill Mangione-Smith

  • Comparing Software And Hardware Schemes For Reducing The Cost Of Branches

    Wen-mei W. Hwu;T.M. Conte;Pohua P. Chang

  • Using branch handling hardware to support profile-driven optimization

    T.M. Conte;B.A. Patel;J.S. Cox

  • Dynamic rescheduling: a technique for object code compatibility in VLIW architectures

    Thomas M. Conte;Sumedh W. Sathaye

  • Accurate and practical profile-driven compilation using the profile buffer

    Thomas M. Conte;Kishore N. Menezes;Mary Ann Hirsch

  • Compiler-driven cached code compression schemes for embedded ILP processors

    Sergei Y. Larin;Thomas M. Conte

  • Benchmark characterization

    T.M. Conte;W.W. Hwu

  • Treegion scheduling for wide issue processors

    W.A. Havanki;S. Banerjia;T.M. Conte

  • The effect of code expanding optimizations on instruction cache design

    W.Y. Chen;P.P. Chang;T.M. Conte;W.W. Hwu

Frequent Co-Authors

Wen-mei W. Hwu
Wen-mei W. Hwu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Huiyang Zhou
Huiyang Zhou North Carolina State University
Paul D. Franzon
Paul D. Franzon North Carolina State University
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette
Pradip Bose
Pradip Bose IBM (United States)
Peter M. Kogge
Peter M. Kogge University of Notre Dame
Dejan Milojicic
Dejan Milojicic Hewlett-Packard (United States)
R. Stanley Williams
R. Stanley Williams Texas A&M University
Todd Austin
Todd Austin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard Vuduc
Richard Vuduc Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens numerous career possibilities across STEM fields. If you’re seeking flexibility and speed, consider an accelerated computer science degree online, which allows you to complete your studies faster while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in sustainability, pursuing an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online prepares you for in-demand roles tackling environmental challenges with modern technology.

If you’re curious about the financial aspects, exploring the mechanical engineering cost of education can help you make informed decisions about investing in your future and selecting the most affordable programs.

Additionally, those captivated by science and innovation can benefit from the best online physics degree programs, which equip you with analytical and problem-solving skills applicable across many industries.

These related online degree options present diverse pathways, enabling you to tailor your education to your career goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Conte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles