World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elena Rochtchina

Elena Rochtchina

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 11037 10367 347 340 316 23535

Elena Rochtchina publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elena Rochtchina between 2000 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elena Rochtchina published across 20 years, from 2000 to 2019, averaging 15.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2007. 2 of the 316 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2007. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 36 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication
2000 2019

316 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elena Rochtchina: publications per year, 2000 to 2019
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 14
2003 24
2004 21
2005 23
2006 36
2007 37
2008 22
2009 29
2010 26
2011 13
2012 14
2013 25
2014 17
2015 3
2016 5
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
Total 316
Download as CSV

Elena Rochtchina publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Rochtchina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 316 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 316
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Elena Rochtchina D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Rochtchina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elena Rochtchina is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research at a reputable institution recognized for its scientific contributions.

Available information does not include specific details regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues associated with their research activities. Similarly, there is no recorded data on book publications or the exact scientific fields and subfields in which they specialize.

The profile does not list particular research topics or main themes present in their work. Additionally, there are no awards or distinctions documented in connection with their academic career.

Due to limited publicly available data, a comprehensive overview of research achievements, collaboration networks, and thematic priorities cannot be provided. However, the association with the University of Sydney suggests engagement in an academic environment that supports research and scholarship.

Best Publications

  • Hearing impairment and health-related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study.

    Ee Munn Chia;Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina;Robert R. Cumming

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Dietary Antioxidants and the Long-term Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Blue Mountains Eye Study

    Jennifer S.L. Tan;Jie Jin Wang;Victoria Flood;Elena Rochtchina

  • Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

    Ee-Munn Chia;Paul Mitchell;Elena Rochtchina;Anne J Lee

  • Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for open angle glaucoma at TMCO1 and CDKN2B-AS1

    Kathryn P Burdon;Stuart Macgregor;Alex W Hewitt;Alex W Hewitt;Shiwani Sharma

  • Ten-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the blue Mountains Eye Study.

    Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina;Anne J. Lee;Ee-Munn Chia

  • Retinal vessel diameter and cardiovascular mortality: pooled data analysis from two older populations

    Jie Jin Wang;Gerald Liew;Ronald Klein;Elena Rochtchina

  • Impact of Bilateral Visual Impairment on Health-Related Quality of Life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study

    Ee-Munn Chia;Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina;Wayne Smith

  • Ten-year incidence of retinal vein occlusion in an older population: The blue mountains eye study

    Sudha Cugati;Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina;Paul Mitchell

  • Relationships between age, blood pressure, and retinal vessel diameters in an older population.

    Harry Leung;Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina;Ava G. Tan

  • Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: The Blue Mountains Eye Study

    Samantha Fraser-Bell;Magdalena Guzowski;Elena Rochtchina;Jie Jin Wang

  • Retinal vessel diameter and open-angle glaucoma: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

    Paul Mitchell;Harry Leung;Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina

  • Open-angle glaucoma and systemic hypertension: the blue mountains eye study.

    Paul Mitchell;Anne J. Lee;Elena Rochtchina;Jie Jin Wang

  • Population prevalence of the MELAS A3243G mutation

    Neil Manwaring;Michael M. Jones;Jie Jin Wang;Elena Rochtchina

  • Vision loss in Australia

    Hugh R Taylor;Jill E Keeffe;Hien T V Vu;Jie Jin Wang

  • Hypertensive Retinal Vessel Wall Signs in a General Older Population. The Blue Mountains Eye Study

    Jie Jin Wang;Paul Mitchell;Harry Leung;Elena Rochtchina

  • Retinal Arteriolar Narrowing Is Associated With 5-Year Incident Severe Hypertension. The Blue Mountains Eye Study

    Wayne Smith;Jie Jin Wang;Tien Yin Wong;Elena Rochtchina

  • Dietary fatty acids and the 5-year incidence of age-related maculopathy.

    Brian Chua;Victoria Flood;Elena Rochtchina;Jie Jin Wang

  • Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus in older adults: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study.

    Doungkamol Sindhusake;Paul Mitchell;Philip Newall;Maryanne Golding

  • Retinal vein occlusion and vascular mortality: pooled data analysis of 2 population-based cohorts.

    Sudha Cugati;Jie Jin Wang;Michael D. Knudtson;Elena Rochtchina

Frequent Co-Authors

Jie Jin Wang
Jie Jin Wang University of Sydney
Paul Mitchell
Paul Mitchell University of Sydney
Tien Yin Wong
Tien Yin Wong Tsinghua University
Philip B. Mitchell
Philip B. Mitchell University of New South Wales
Wayne Smith
Wayne Smith University of Newcastle Australia
Ronald Klein
Ronald Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert G. Cumming
Robert G. Cumming University of Sydney
Barbara E. K. Klein
Barbara E. K. Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
John Attia
John Attia University of Newcastle Australia
Sudha K. Iyengar
Sudha K. Iyengar Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always mean following a single path to becoming a doctor. Many students look for flexible and fast ways to advance in healthcare through online programs. For registered nurses, online rn to bsn no clinicals programs offer the opportunity to complete a BSN degree without the extra on-site clinical requirements, making it easier to balance work and studies.

If you're aiming for the highest level in nursing, consider the quickest dnp program pathway, which helps you earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time. Some students may also prefer dnp programs without dissertation, which streamline the academic process by removing the dissertation requirement.

For those beginning their healthcare journey, lpn online programs serve as a fast-track entry into practical nursing with flexible online coursework. These diverse online options allow for personalized career growth and can be a smart alternative or complement to traditional medicine degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Rochtchina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles