World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
9953
World Ranking
12193
National Ranking
871

Jens Waschke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Waschke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 248 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jens Waschke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Waschke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Waschke is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and conducts research primarily in the field of medicine, with a specialization in several subfields such as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pathology and forensic medicine, genetics, molecular biology, and rheumatology.

Their scholarly output includes work across prominent scientific venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
  • The FASEB Journal
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The main research topics covered by Waschke include autoimmune bullous skin diseases, coagulation and angioedema, cardiovascular effects of exercise, urticaria and related conditions, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, anatomy and medical technology, and innovations in medical education.

Recent significant publications by Waschke encompass the following works:

  • "Targeting desmosomal adhesion and signalling for intestinal barrier stabilization in inflammatory bowel diseases-Lessons from experimental models and patients" (2020), published in Acta Physiologica
  • "The Effectiveness of Collaborative Augmented Reality in Gross Anatomy Teaching: A Quantitative and Qualitative Pilot Study" (2020), published in Anatomical Sciences Education
  • "Autoantibody-Specific Signalling in Pemphigus" (2021), published in Frontiers in Medicine
  • "Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Maturation by Enteric Glial Cells Is GDNF-Dependent" (2021), published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "Mechanisms Causing Acantholysis in Pemphigus-Lessons from Human Skin" (2022), published in Frontiers in Immunology

Waschke collaborates frequently with a range of co-authors, most notably:

  • Franziska Vielmuth
  • Sunil Yeruva
  • Matthias Hiermaier
  • Daniela Kugelmann
  • Anna M. Sigmund

Best Publications

  • Role of GTPases in control of microvascular permeability.

    Volker Spindler;Nicolas Schlegel;Jens Waschke

  • The desmosome and pemphigus.

    Jens Waschke

  • Mind the gap: mechanisms regulating the endothelial barrier.

    M. Y. Radeva;J. Waschke

  • Membrane Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Induces p100 Processing via TNF Receptor-2 (TNFR2)

    Hilka Rauert;Andreas Wicovsky;Nicole Müller;Daniela Siegmund

  • Differential VASP phosphorylation controls remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton.

    Peter M. Benz;Constanze Blume;Stefanie Seifert;Sabine Wilhelm

  • Pemphigus foliaceus IgG causes dissociation of desmoglein 1–containing junctions without blocking desmoglein 1 transinteraction

    Jens Waschke;Paola Bruggeman;Werner Baumgartner;Detlef Zillikens

  • Inhibition of Rho A activity causes pemphigus skin blistering.

    Jens Waschke;Volker Spindler;Paola Bruggeman;Detlef Zillikens

  • Personalized augmented reality for anatomy education.

    Meng Ma;Pascal Fallavollita;Ina Seelbach;Anna Maria Von Der Heide

  • Requirement of Rac activity for maintenance of capillary endothelial barrier properties.

    J. Waschke;W. Baumgartner;R. H. Adamson;M. Zeng

  • Nano-Scale Dynamic Recognition Imaging on Vascular Endothelial Cells

    Lilia A. Chtcheglova;Jens Waschke;Linda Wildling;Detlev Drenckhahn

  • Pemphigus vulgaris IgG directly inhibit desmoglein 3-mediated transinteraction.

    Wolfgang-Moritz Heupel;Detlef Zillikens;Detlev Drenckhahn;Jens Waschke

  • Regulation of actin dynamics is critical for endothelial barrier functions.

    J. Waschke;F. E. Curry;R. H. Adamson;D. Drenckhahn

  • Mechanisms Causing Loss of Keratinocyte Cohesion in Pemphigus

    Volker Spindler;Rüdiger Eming;Enno Schmidt;Masayuki Amagai

  • Role of Rac 1 and cAMP in endothelial barrier stabilization and thrombin-induced barrier breakdown.

    Y. Baumer;V. Spindler;R.C. Werthmann;M. Bünemann

  • The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.

    Felix Bork;Leonard Stratmann;Stefan Enssle;Ulrich Eck

  • cAMP induced Rac 1-mediated cytoskeletal reorganization in microvascular endothelium

    Y Baumer;D Drenckhahn;J Waschke

  • Soluble VE-cadherin is involved in endothelial barrier breakdown in systemic inflammation and sepsis

    Sven Flemming;Natalie Burkard;Melanie Renschler;Franziska Vielmuth

  • Desmocollin 3-mediated Binding Is Crucial for Keratinocyte Cohesion and Is Impaired in Pemphigus *

    Volker Spindler;Wolfgang-Moritz Heupel;Athina Efthymiadis;Enno Schmidt

  • A contoured locking plate for distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: A biomechanical cadaver study

    Robert Karl Zahn;Soenke Frey;Rafael Gregor Jakubietz;Michael Georg Jakubietz

  • cAMP protects endothelial barrier functions by preventing Rac-1 inhibition

    J. Waschke;D. Drenckhahn;R. H. Adamson;H. Barth

Frequent Co-Authors

Detlev Drenckhahn
Detlev Drenckhahn University of Würzburg
Enno Schmidt
Enno Schmidt University of Lübeck
Detlef Zillikens
Detlef Zillikens University of Lübeck
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Peter Hinterdorfer
Peter Hinterdorfer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Masayuki Amagai
Masayuki Amagai Keio University
Rudolf E. Leube
Rudolf E. Leube RWTH Aachen University
Harald Wajant
Harald Wajant University of Würzburg
Holger Barth
Holger Barth University of Ulm
Thomas M. Magin
Thomas M. Magin Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to dynamic careers in healthcare and life sciences. Many students pursue advanced degrees, such as a healthcare MBA, to further their expertise and leadership potential. When considering program costs, it's worth exploring the healthcare mba cost to find suitable and affordable online options.

For those interested in administrative roles, medical coding is a growing field with strong job prospects. Curious about salaries? Learn about medical coding jobs salary and what you can expect as a professional coder.

If you're planning on certification, it's important to understand the differences between credentials. Explore ccs certification, including cost, benefits, and career growth potential. Still deciding if this is the right path? Weigh the is medical coding a good career pros and cons to make an informed decision.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Waschke

Trending Scientists