World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
10194
World Ranking
7760
National Ranking
58

K. Reinikainen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Reinikainen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 59 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

K. Reinikainen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Reinikainen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

K. Reinikainen is a researcher affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland. Their academic work is associated with this institution, indicating a likely focus on topics relevant to the university's research environment and academic programs.

Currently, there is no documented list of published papers by K. Reinikainen. Similarly, details regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications are not available. This limits insight into the specific scientific contributions or collaborations they may have engaged in.

Information about their main fields of study and subfields of study is also not provided. Consequently, there is no detailed data on the particular academic disciplines or specialized research areas that characterize their work.

Likewise, no records of main topics of work, awards won, or recognitions are currently accessible, which means any notable achievements or thematic focuses cannot be detailed at this time.

Despite the absence of specific data on publications and research topics, affiliation with the University of Helsinki indicates involvement in an environment known for diverse scientific inquiry and academic research across multiple fields.

Best Publications

  • Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans

    H. T. Tiitinen;J. Sinkkonen;K. Reinikainen;K. Alho

  • Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory

    Hannu Tiitinen;Patrick May;K. Reinikainen;R. Näätänen

  • Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man.

    Riitta Hari;Matti Hämäläinen;R. Ilmoniemi;E. Kaukoranta

  • Separate representation of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event-related potential and dipole-model analysis

    M. H. Giard;J. Lavikahen;K. Reinikainen;F. Perrin

  • Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain?

    Risto Näätänen;Petri Paavilainen;Kimmo Alho;Kalevi Reinikainen

  • Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities

    Petri Paavilainen;Kimmo Alho;Kalevi Reinikainen;Mikko Sams

  • Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus☆

    Kimmo Alho;K Sainio;Nina Kristiina Sajaniemi;K Reinikainen

  • Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission.

    Hirooki Yabe;Mari Tervaniemi;Kalevi Reinikainen;Risto Näätänen

  • Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?

    Risto Näätänen;Petri Paavilainen;Kalevi Reinikainen

  • Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus

    Petri Paavilainen;Marja-Liisa Karlsson;Kalevi Reinikainen;Risto Näätänen

  • Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns

    M Cheourluhtanen;Kimmo Alho;Teija Kujala;K Sainio

  • Maturation of mismatch negativity in infants.

    M. Cheour;K. Alho;R. Čeponiené;K. Reinikainen

  • The ontogenetically earliest discriminative response of the human brain

    M. Cheour‐Luhtanen;K. Alho;K. Sainio;T. Rinne

  • Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components.

    Heikki Hämäläinen;Jouni Kekoni;Mikko Sams;Kalevi Reinikainen

  • Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave.

    Risto Näätänen;Mikko Sams;Kimmo Alho;Petri Paavilainen

  • Mismatch negativity to auditory stimulus change recorded directly from the human temporal cortex.

    J. D. Kropotov;R. Nääänen;A. V. Sevostianov;K. Alho

  • Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory stimulus processing.

    K. Alho;P. Paavilainen;K. Reinikainen;Mikko Sams

  • Auditory and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in early blind humans

    T. Kujala;K. Alho;J. Kekoni;H. Hämäläinen

  • Brain mechanism of selective listening reflected by event-related potentials.

    Kimmo Alho;Kimmo Töttölä;Kalevi Reinikainen;Mikko Sams

  • Selective tuning of the left and right auditory cortices during spatially directed attention

    Kimmo Alho;Sviatoslav V. Medvedev;Sergei V. Pakhomov;Marina S. Roudas

Frequent Co-Authors

Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Kimmo Alho
Kimmo Alho University of Helsinki
Mikko Sams
Mikko Sams Aalto University
Petri Paavilainen
Petri Paavilainen University of Helsinki
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Teija Kujala
Teija Kujala University of Helsinki
Heikki Hämäläinen
Heikki Hämäläinen University of Turku
Yury Shtyrov
Yury Shtyrov Aarhus University
Eero Pekkonen
Eero Pekkonen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up several related fields, with social work being one of the most popular pathways. Many aspiring professionals want to know the degree needed to be a social worker in Illinois, as requirements differ by state and level of licensure.

In Indiana, students should pay close attention to social worker education requirements in Indiana. Typically, earning at least a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in social work is required. Similar standards apply in neighboring states such as Iowa, where social worker degree requirements in Iowa also mandate accredited programs for licensure eligibility.

Exploring online degrees can also help meet the Kansas minimum degree requirement for social workers, providing flexibility for working professionals and those balancing other commitments. Researching these requirements early helps ensure your academic path aligns with your career ambitions in social services or mental health.

Best Scientists Citing K. Reinikainen

Recently Published Articles