What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Neuroscience
- Perception
- Cognition
His primary scientific interests are in Mismatch negativity, Stimulus, Audiology, Event-related potential and Engram.
Mismatch negativity is a subfield of Neuroscience that K. Reinikainen studies.
In general Neuroscience study, his work on Perception often relates to the realm of Scalp, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Electroencephalography and Stimulus.
In his research, Voice pitch, Acoustics and Communication is intimately related to Electrophysiology, which falls under the overarching field of Electroencephalography.
His Engram research includes themes of Sound localization and Hemispheric asymmetry.
His most cited work include:
- Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans (587 citations)
- Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory (546 citations)
- Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities (318 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
K. Reinikainen spends much of his time researching Mismatch negativity, Stimulus, Audiology, Neuroscience and Event-related potential.
His Mismatch negativity research incorporates themes from Electrophysiology and Engram.
K. Reinikainen has included themes like Somatosensory system, Selective attention, Processing negativity, Selective auditory attention and Communication in his Stimulus study.
His Audiology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Sleep in non-human animals, Oddball paradigm, Stimulus change and P3a.
Many of his research projects under Neuroscience are closely connected to Scalp with Scalp, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Neutral stimulus and Human brain in addition to Event-related potential.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mismatch negativity (61.22%)
- Stimulus (53.06%)
- Audiology (51.02%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1997-2007)?
- Audiology (51.02%)
- Auditory cortex (8.16%)
- Neuroscience (42.86%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
K. Reinikainen mostly deals with Audiology, Auditory cortex, Neuroscience, Electroencephalography and Developmental psychology.
His Audiology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Electrophysiology and Communication.
His studies link Mnemonic with Neuroscience.
In the subject of general Electroencephalography, his work in Mismatch negativity and N100 is often linked to First language, Sentence and Word, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
His Mismatch negativity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Attentional control, Cognition and Auditory perception.
His Selective attention research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Stimulus and Event-related potential.
Between 1997 and 2007, his most popular works were:
- Selective tuning of the left and right auditory cortices during spatially directed attention (139 citations)
- Maturation of mismatch negativity in infants. (135 citations)
- Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity. (77 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Neuroscience
- Cognition
- Perception
His primary areas of investigation include Stimulus, Event-related potential, Developmental psychology, Audiology and Electrophysiology.
His work deals with themes such as Auditory cortex, N2pc, Sound localization, Lateralization of brain function and Human brain, which intersect with Stimulus.
Event-related potential is a primary field of his research addressed under Neuroscience.
His studies in Developmental psychology integrate themes in fields like Processing negativity and Vigilance.
His Audiology research incorporates elements of Mismatch negativity and Electroencephalography.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
