World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8842
World Ranking
5762
National Ranking
2097

Thomas C. J. Hill publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas C. J. Hill sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 233 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas C. J. Hill D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas C. J. Hill sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Candidatus "Scalindua brodae", sp. nov., Candidatus "Scalindua wagneri", sp. nov., two new species of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria.

    Markus Schmid;Kerry Walsh;Rick Webb;W Irene C Rijpstra

  • Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles

    Paul J. DeMott;Thomas C. J. Hill;Christina S. McCluskey;Kimberly A. Prather

  • A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques

    Naruki Hiranuma;Stefanie Augustin-Bauditz;Heinz Bingemer;Carsten Budke

  • Observations of clouds, aerosols, precipitation, and surface radiation over the southern ocean

    Greg Michael McFarquhar;Christopher S. Bretherton;Roger Marchand;Alain Protat

  • Observations of ice nucleating particles over Southern Ocean waters

    C. S. McCluskey;C. S. McCluskey;T. C. J. Hill;R. S. Humphries;A. M. Rauker

  • Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils

    Tom C. J. Hill;Paul J. DeMott;Yutaka Tobo;Yutaka Tobo;Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky

  • Microbial Control of Sea Spray Aerosol Composition: A Tale of Two Blooms

    Xiaofei Wang;Camille M. Sultana;Jonathan Trueblood;Thomas C. J. Hill

  • Marine and Terrestrial Organic Ice-Nucleating Particles in Pristine Marine to Continentally Influenced Northeast Atlantic Air Masses

    Christina S. McCluskey;Christina S. McCluskey;Jurgita Ovadnevaite;Matteo Rinaldi;James Atkinson

  • Glacially sourced dust as a potentially significant source of ice nucleating particles

    Yutaka Tobo;Yutaka Tobo;Kouji Adachi;Paul J. DeMott;Thomas C. J. Hill

  • The utility of ergosterol as a bioindicator of fungi in temperate soils

    Unknown

  • Measurement of ice nucleation-active bacteria on plants and in precipitation by quantitative PCR.

    Thomas C. J. Hill;Bruce F. Moffett;Paul J. DeMott;Dimitrios G. Georgakopoulos

  • Ice nucleation activity in the widespread soil fungus Mortierella alpina

    J. Fröhlich-Nowoisky;T. C. J. Hill;B. G. Pummer;P. Yordanova

  • A Dynamic Link between Ice Nucleating Particles Released in Nascent Sea Spray Aerosol and Oceanic Biological Activity during Two Mesocosm Experiments

    Christina S. McCluskey;Thomas C. J. Hill;Francesca Malfatti;Camille M. Sultana

  • Organic matter matters for ice nuclei of agricultural soil origin

    Y. Tobo;Y. Tobo;P. J. DeMott;T. C. J. Hill;T. C. J. Hill;A. J. Prenni;A. J. Prenni

  • Bioaerosol field measurements: Challenges and perspectives in outdoor studies

    Tina Šantl-Temkiv;Branko Sikoparija;Teruya Maki;Federico Carotenuto

  • Biogenic ice nuclei in boundary layer air over two U.S. High Plains agricultural regions

    Elvin Garcia;Thomas C. J. Hill;Anthony J. Prenni;Paul J. DeMott

  • Size-resolved measurements of ice-nucleating particles at six locations in North America and one in Europe

    R. H. Mason;M. Si;C. Chou;V. E. Irish

  • Microbiology and atmospheric processes: biological, physical and chemical characterization of aerosol particles

    D. G. Georgakopoulos;V. Despres;J. Frohlich-Nowoisky;R. Psenner

  • The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation phase 2 (FIN-02): laboratory intercomparison of ice nucleation measurements

    Paul J. DeMott;Ottmar Möhler;Daniel J. Cziczo;Naruki Hiranuma;Naruki Hiranuma

  • A Mesocosm Double Feature: Insights into the Chemical Makeup of Marine Ice Nucleating Particles

    Christina S. McCluskey;Thomas C. J. Hill;Camille M. Sultana;Olga Laskina

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. DeMott
Paul J. DeMott Colorado State University
Sonia M. Kreidenweis
Sonia M. Kreidenweis Colorado State University
Kimberly A. Prather
Kimberly A. Prather University of California, San Diego
Darin W. Toohey
Darin W. Toohey University of Colorado Boulder
Greg M. McFarquhar
Greg M. McFarquhar University of Oklahoma
Ryan C. Sullivan
Ryan C. Sullivan Carnegie Mellon University
Andrew Gettelman
Andrew Gettelman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Alain Protat
Alain Protat Bureau of Meteorology
Vicki H. Grassian
Vicki H. Grassian University of California, San Diego
Allan K. Bertram
Allan K. Bertram University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options offer flexible and affordable paths. For example, students exploring social impact through environmental work might consider the cheapest dsw program, which provides advanced knowledge on community and social welfare.

Alternatively, if you're looking for a broad academic foundation that can complement environmental studies, a cheap online general studies degree offers a versatile and cost-effective option. This approach allows students to tailor coursework to their interests, including environmental and sustainability topics.

For those prioritizing ease and flexibility in completing their education, it's helpful to explore programs identified as the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. While "easy" is subjective, these programs often feature accommodating schedules and less intensive credit requirements, making them accessible for working professionals.

Lastly, students passionate about the Earth's physical processes might find a focused path in a geology online degree. This specialized study supports careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and geotechnical fields.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas C. J. Hill

Recently Published Articles