World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
95
Citations
64130
World Ranking
452
National Ranking
248

Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 733 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar is a researcher affiliated with Florida Atlantic University in the United States. Their work primarily belongs to the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their research covers multiple topics such as Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques, Machine Learning and Data Classification, Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications, Network Security and Intrusion Detection, Electricity Theft Detection Techniques, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting.

They have published extensively in several venues, notably the Journal Of Big Data, where they have 41 publications. Other frequent publication venues include SN Computer Science, International Journal of Internet of Things and Cyber-Assurance, the 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), and the International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering.

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods (2024) in Journal Of Big Data
  • Text Data Augmentation for Deep Learning (2021) in Journal Of Big Data
  • Deep Learning applications for COVID-19 (2021) in Journal Of Big Data
  • CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review (2020) in Journal Of Big Data
  • Survey on categorical data for neural networks (2020) in Journal Of Big Data

They have also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Springer Nature titled Deep Learning Applications, Volume 2 in 2020.

Frequent coauthors of Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar include:

  • Joffrey L. Leevy
  • John Hancock
  • Justin Johnson
  • Connor Shorten
  • John M. Hancock

Best Publications

  • A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning

    Connor Shorten;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • A survey of transfer learning

    Karl R. Weiss;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Dingding Wang

  • A survey of collaborative filtering techniques

    Xiaoyuan Su;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics

    Maryam M Najafabadi;Flavio Villanustre;Taghi M Khoshgoftaar;Naeem Seliya

  • Survey on deep learning with class imbalance

    Justin M. Johnson;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • RUSBoost: A Hybrid Approach to Alleviating Class Imbalance

    C. Seiffert;T.M. Khoshgoftaar;J. Van Hulse;A. Napolitano

  • CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review

    John T. Hancock;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • Text Data Augmentation for Deep Learning.

    Connor Shorten;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Borko Furht

  • Experimental perspectives on learning from imbalanced data

    Jason Van Hulse;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Amri Napolitano

  • A survey on addressing high-class imbalance in big data

    Joffrey L. Leevy;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Richard A. Bauder;Naeem Seliya

  • The detection of fault-prone programs

    J.C. Munson;T.M. Khoshgoftaar

  • Survey on categorical data for neural networks

    John T. Hancock;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • A survey of open source tools for machine learning with big data in the Hadoop ecosystem

    Sara Landset;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Aaron N. Richter;Tawfiq Hasanin

  • Survey of review spam detection using machine learning techniques

    Michael Crawford;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Joseph D. Prusa;Aaron N. Richter

  • Intrusion detection and Big Heterogeneous Data: a Survey

    Richard Zuech;Taghi M Khoshgoftaar;Randall Wald

  • A review of data mining using big data in health informatics

    Matthew Herland;Taghi M Khoshgoftaar;Randall Wald

  • A survey on heterogeneous transfer learning

    Oscar Day;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • An Empirical Study of Learning from Imbalanced Data Using Random Forest

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;M. Golawala;J. Van Hulse

  • Big Data: Deep Learning for financial sentiment analysis

    Sahar Sohangir;Dingding Wang;Anna Pomeranets;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

  • Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods

    Unknown

  • Predicting software development errors using software complexity metrics

    T.M. Khoshgoftaar;J.C. Munson

  • Choosing software metrics for defect prediction: an investigation on feature selection techniques

    Kehan Gao;Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar;Huanjing Wang;Naeem Seliya

  • Comparing Boosting and Bagging Techniques With Noisy and Imbalanced Data

    T M Khoshgoftaar;J Van Hulse;A Napolitano

Frequent Co-Authors

Naeem Seliya
Naeem Seliya University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
Edward B. Allen
Edward B. Allen Mississippi State University
Alain Abran
Alain Abran École de Technologie Supérieure
Borko Furht
Borko Furht Florida Atlantic University
Ali Idri
Ali Idri Mohammed V University
Mayuram S. Krishnan
Mayuram S. Krishnan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Tridas Mukhopadhyay
Tridas Mukhopadhyay Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a flexible and cost-effective way to start or advance your computer science career in the USA. Many students choose to pursue an associates degrees online to gain foundational skills and enter the tech workforce quickly. These programs can be a stepping stone to higher education or directly into entry-level IT roles.

For those seeking to boost their qualifications rapidly, pursuing the shortest online masters degree can help you earn a credential in less time, balancing speed with quality learning. It’s also important to consider what programs provide the best return on investment: learn which are the best masters degree to get for long-term career growth and high-demand roles.

If affordability is a key concern, plenty of reputable colleges offer quality education at reduced rates. Discover some of the cheapest online degrees to minimize financial stress while building your future. With so many options available, choosing the right online pathway can set the stage for a successful and fulfilling tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles