World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
8826
World Ranking
5764
National Ranking
87

Jianjun Yang publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jianjun Yang sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 203 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jianjun Yang D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jianjun Yang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jianjun Yang is affiliated with Zhengzhou University in China and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on molecular biology, surgery, neurology, critical care and intensive care medicine, as well as anesthesiology and pain medicine. Their publication record demonstrates a strong engagement with clinical and basic research related to neurological outcomes and anesthesia effects.

Their main areas of research encompass the following topics:

  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders

Jianjun Yang has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Scientific Reports
  • Drug Design Development and Therapy

Their collaborative network includes several frequent co-authors, notably:

  • Mu-Huo Ji
  • Kenji Hashimoto
  • Cheng-Mao Zhou
  • Hanwen Gu
  • Jianhua Tong

Some recent and cited papers associated with Jianjun Yang's work include:

  • "Understanding Esophageal Cancer: The Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Decade," 2020, Frontiers in Oncology
  • "Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control," 2020, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • "Dysregulation of BDNF/TrkB signaling mediated by NMDAR/Ca2+/calpain might contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aging mice," 2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • "Effect of Intraoperative Esketamine Infusion on Postoperative Sleep Disturbance After Gynecological Laparoscopy," 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • "Iron overload contributes to general anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive deficits," 2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation

The variety of topics covered in these publications reflects a focus on the intersection of anesthesia, neurological outcomes, and inflammation, as well as the implications of these processes for clinical anesthesia and surgery.

Best Publications

  • Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control

    Zhenyu Li;Jingwu Ge;Meiling Yang;Jianping Feng

  • Ketamine-induced antidepressant effects are associated with AMPA receptors-mediated upregulation of mTOR and BDNF in rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex

    W. Zhou;N. Wang;C. Yang;X.-M. Li

  • Dysregulation of BDNF/TrkB signaling mediated by NMDAR/Ca2+/calpain might contribute to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aging mice.

    Li-Li Qiu;Wei Pan;Dan Luo;Guang-Fen Zhang

  • NLRP3/Caspase-1 Pathway-Induced Pyroptosis Mediated Cognitive Deficits in a Mouse Model of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy.

    Qun Fu;Jing Wu;Xiao-Yan Zhou;Mu-Huo Ji

  • Acute administration of ketamine in rats increases hippocampal BDNF and mTOR levels during forced swimming test

    Chun Yang;Yi-Min Hu;Zhi-Qiang Zhou;Guang-Fen Zhang

  • Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of ketamine enantiomers and its metabolites.

    Chun Yang;Chun Yang;Jianjun Yang;Ailin Luo;Kenji Hashimoto

  • Serum interleukin-6 is a predictive biomarker for ketamine's antidepressant effect in treatment-resistant patients with major depression.

    Jian-jun Yang;Nan Wang;Chun Yang;Jin-yun Shi

  • Regulation of glutamate transporter 1 via BDNF-TrkB signaling plays a role in the anti-apoptotic and antidepressant effects of ketamine in chronic unpredictable stress model of depression

    Wen-Xue Liu;Jing Wang;Ze-Min Xie;Ze-Min Xie;Ning Xu;Ning Xu

  • Spared Nerve Injury Increases the Expression of Microglia M1 Markers in the Prefrontal Cortex of Rats and Provokes Depression-Like Behaviors.

    Ning Xu;Ning Xu;Xiao-Hui Tang;Wei Pan;Ze-Min Xie

  • NADPH oxidase 2-derived reactive oxygen species in the hippocampus might contribute to microglial activation in postoperative cognitive dysfunction in aged mice.

    Qiu Ll;Ji Mh;Zhang H;Yang Jj

  • Mitochondria-Targeted Peptide Reverses Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cognitive Deficits in Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy.

    Jing Wu;Mingqiang Zhang;Shuangying Hao;Ming Jia

  • Iron overload contributes to general anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity and cognitive deficits

    Jing Wu;Jian-Jun Yang;Yan Cao;Huihui Li

  • The rapid antidepressant effect of ketamine in rats is associated with down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus

    Nan Wang;Hai-Ying Yu;Xiao-Feng Shen;Zhi-Qin Gao

  • Resveratrol Pretreatment Attenuates the Isoflurane-Induced Cognitive Impairment Through its Anti-Inflammation and -Apoptosis Actions in Aged Mice

    Xiao-min Li;Mai-tao Zhou;Xing-ming Wang;Mu-huo Ji

  • Changes in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in aged patients with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction following total hip-replacement surgery

    Mu-Huo Ji;Hong-Mei Yuan;Guang-Fen Zhang;Xiao-Min Li

  • Epigenetic Enhancement of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling Pathway Improves Cognitive Impairments Induced by Isoflurane Exposure in Aged Rats

    MuHuo Ji;Lin Dong;Min Jia;WenXue Liu

  • Self-assembled colloidal arrays for structural color

    Panmiao Liu;Ling Bai;Jianjun Yang;Hongcheng Gu

  • Loss of phenotype of parvalbumin interneurons in rat prefrontal cortex is involved in antidepressant- and propsychotic-like behaviors following acute and repeated ketamine administration.

    ZhiQiang Zhou;GuangFen Zhang;XiaoMin Li;XiaoYu Liu

  • Alterations in the inflammatory cytokines and brain-derived neurotrophic factor contribute to depression-like phenotype after spared nerve injury: improvement by ketamine

    Ze-Min Xie;Ze-Min Xie;Xing-Ming Wang;Ning Xu;Ning Xu;Jing Wang;Jing Wang

  • Extrasynaptic CaMKIIα is involved in the antidepressant effects of ketamine by downregulating GluN2B receptors in an LPS-induced depression model

    Xiao-Hui Tang;Guang-Fen Zhang;Ning Xu;Gui-Fang Duan

  • Ketamine exerts antidepressant effects and reduces IL-1β and IL-6 levels in rat prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.

    Chun Yang;Tao Hong;Jiang Shen;Jie Ding

  • Hypermethylation of Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity-Related genes is Involved in Neonatal Sevoflurane Exposure-Induced Cognitive Impairments in Rats.

    Ling-sha Ju;Min Jia;Jie Sun;Xiao-ru Sun

Frequent Co-Authors

Hui Zhang
Hui Zhang Johns Hopkins University
Kenji Hashimoto
Kenji Hashimoto Chiba University
Xiang Gao
Xiang Gao Nanjing University
Weidong Zhang
Weidong Zhang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Ning Wang
Ning Wang Dalian Maritime University
Colin Sumners
Colin Sumners University of Florida
Yuan Xiang Tao
Yuan Xiang Tao Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Matthew P. Jacobson
Matthew P. Jacobson University of California, San Francisco
Gabriel Nowak
Gabriel Nowak Jagiellonian University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can lead to diverse career options, often overlapping with fields like psychology and counseling. For students interested in mental health or therapeutic professions, earning a degree online offers both flexibility and accessibility.

If you're considering a route that emphasizes counseling, there are several best online cacrep counseling programs that meet high accreditation standards and can serve as a foundation for licensed professional roles. Similarly, choosing an online counseling degree accredited by recognized bodies ensures quality education and better employability.

Those drawn to working with families will find specialized training through an online masters mft program. For broader psychological study, pursuing an affordable online master's in psychology can open doors to research, teaching, and advanced clinical opportunities.

Each pathway supports growth in neuroscience-related fields, letting students tailor careers to their interests and build a strong foundation for future advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Jianjun Yang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles