World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
13975
World Ranking
11884
National Ranking
308

Paul L. E. Bodelier publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. E. Bodelier sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 186 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul L. E. Bodelier D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. E. Bodelier sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul L. E. Bodelier is affiliated with the Netherlands Institute of Ecology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a notable emphasis on microbial community ecology and physiology. The scholar's work spans multiple subfields including ecology, molecular biology, environmental chemistry, global and planetary change, and soil science.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Microbial Metabolism and Enzyme Function
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Gut Microbiota and Health
  • Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Among their recent papers are:

  • Methanotrophy by a Mycobacterium species that dominates a cave microbial ecosystem, 2022, Nature Microbiology
  • DNA stable-isotope probing highlights the effects of temperature on functionally active methanotrophs in natural wetlands, 2020, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • Archaea and their interactions with bacteria in a karst ecosystem, 2023, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Response of a methane-driven interaction network to stressor intensification, 2020, FEMS Microbiology Ecology
  • Metabolic coupling between soil aerobic methanotrophs and denitrifiers in rice paddy fields, 2024, Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors in Bodelier's publications include Marion Meima-Franke, Kristof Brenzinger, G.W. Korthals, Elvira Schnyder, and Martin Hartmann. These collaborations reflect a diverse network of researchers contributing to the understanding of microbial ecology and environmental processes.

Publication venues where Bodelier has frequently contributed include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • Biology and Fertility of Soils

Best Publications

  • Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments.

    Paul L.E Bodelier;Hendrikus J Laanbroek

  • Methane oxidation by an extremely acidophilic bacterium of the phylum Verrucomicrobia

    Peter F. Dunfield;Anton Yuryev;Pavel Senin;Pavel Senin;Angela V. Smirnova

  • Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology.

    A. Ho;D. P. di Lonardo;P. L. E. Bodelier

  • Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots

    Paul L. E. Bodelier;Peter Roslev;Thilo Henckel;Peter Frenzel

  • Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2.

    Barbara Drigo;Agata S. Pijl;Henk Duyts;Anna M. Kielak

  • The impact of climate change on lakes in the Netherlands: a review

    Wolf M. Mooij;Stephan Hülsmann;Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis;Bart A. Nolet

  • Trait-based approaches for understanding microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

    Sascha Krause;Xavier Le Roux;Pascal A. Niklaus;Peter M. Van Bodegom

  • Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils.

    Yuanfeng Cai;Yan Zheng;Paul L. E. Bodelier;Ralf Conrad

  • Dynamics of nitrification and denitrification in root- oxygenated sediments and adaptation of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria to low-oxygen or anoxic habitats

    P.L.E. Bodelier;J.A. Libochant;C.W.P.M. Blom;H.J. Laanbroek

  • Differential Effects of Nitrogenous Fertilizers on Methane-Consuming Microbes in Rice Field and Forest Soils

    Santosh R. Mohanty;Paul L. E. Bodelier;Virgilio Floris;Ralf Conrad

  • Community analysis of ammonia-oxidising bacteria, in relation to oxygen availability in soils and root-oxygenated sediments, using PCR, DGGE and oligonucleotide probe hybridisation

    George A. Kowalchuk;Paul L.E. Bodelier;G.Hans J. Heilig;John R. Stephen

  • Conceptualizing functional traits and ecological characteristics of methane-oxidizing bacteria as life strategies.

    Adrian Ho;Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof;Claudia Luke;Andreas Reim

  • Interactions between nitrogenous fertilizers and methane cycling in wetland and upland soils

    Paul Le Bodelier

  • Oxygen consumption kinetics of Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrobacter hamburgensis grown in mixed continuous cultures at different oxygen concentrations

    Hendrikus J. Laanbroek;Paul L. E. Bodelier;Saskia Gerards

  • Effects of ammonium-based fertilisation on microbial processes involved in methane emission from soils planted with rice

    Paul L.E. Bodelier;Alexandra P. Hahn;Inko R. Arth;Peter Frenzel

  • Effects of Grazing by the Free-Living Soil Amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii, Acanthamoeba polyphaga, and Hartmannella vermiformis on Various Bacteria.

    Peter H. H. Weekers;Paul L. E. Bodelier;John P. H. Wijen;Godfried D. Vogels

  • Toward understanding, managing, and protecting microbial ecosystems.

    Paul L. E. Bodelier

  • Effect of temperature on composition of the methanotrophic community in rice field and forest soil

    Santosh R. Mohanty;Paul L.E. Bodelier;Ralf Conrad

  • Methylocystis heyeri sp. nov., a novel type II methanotrophic bacterium possessing 'signature' fatty acids of type I methanotrophs.

    Svetlana N. Dedysh;Svetlana E. Belova;Paul L. E. Bodelier;Ksenia V. Smirnova

  • A reanalysis of phospholipid fatty acids as ecological biomarkers for methanotrophic bacteria

    Paul L E Bodelier;Marie-José Bär Gillisen;Kees Hordijk;Jaap S Sinninghe Damsté

Frequent Co-Authors

Hendrikus J. Laanbroek
Hendrikus J. Laanbroek Utrecht University
Svetlana N. Dedysh
Svetlana N. Dedysh Russian Academy of Sciences
Gerard Muyzer
Gerard Muyzer University of Amsterdam
Mariet M. Hefting
Mariet M. Hefting Utrecht University
Levente Bodrossy
Levente Bodrossy Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Zhongjun Jia
Zhongjun Jia Chinese Academy of Sciences
Peter F. Dunfield
Peter F. Dunfield University of Calgary
Peter Frenzel
Peter Frenzel Max Planck Society
Wietse de Boer
Wietse de Boer Wageningen University & Research
Aad J. Termorshuizen
Aad J. Termorshuizen Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Biology and Biochemistry, there are a range of flexible online degrees that complement these fields. Many healthcare professions now offer advanced online programs, enabling learners to specialize while fitting studies around their schedules.

For example, those looking to advance in nursing leadership can consider msn to dnp online no clinicals programs, which emphasize leadership and administration without requiring clinical practicum hours. If you’re aiming for a high-level career in healthcare organizations, a phd in healthcare management online can prepare you for executive and management roles.

For those interested in pharmaceuticals, online pharmacy schools offer doctorate-level training, opening doors in research, regulatory or clinical practice. Meanwhile, if human movement and wellness interest you, an online exercise physiology degree provides pathways to sports science, rehabilitation, or fitness careers.

Choosing an online degree tailored to your biology or biochemistry background can expand your career options across healthcare, life sciences, and fitness industries.

Best Scientists Citing Paul L. E. Bodelier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles