What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Gene
His primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Cancer, Risk factor, Gastroenterology and Odds ratio.
The concepts of his Internal medicine study are interwoven with issues in Endocrinology and Surgery.
His Cancer study which covers Gynecology that intersects with Breast cancer.
His Risk factor study combines topics in areas such as Absolute risk reduction, Epidemiology and Oncology.
William J. Blot has researched Gastroenterology in several fields, including Esophagus, Esophageal disease and Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma.
His studies deal with areas such as Body mass index, Genetics and Genetic association as well as Odds ratio.
His most cited work include:
- Rising Incidence of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and nGastric Cardia (2088 citations)
- Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States (1974 citations)
- Nutrition Intervention Trials in Linxian, China: Supplementation With Specific Vitamin/Mineral Combinations, Cancer Incidence, and Disease-Specific Mortality in the General Population (1520 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
William J. Blot mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Cohort study, Cancer, Odds ratio and Cohort.
His study in Internal medicine is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Gastroenterology and Oncology.
His Gastroenterology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Esophagus and Adenocarcinoma.
His research in Cohort study intersects with topics in Body mass index, Prospective cohort study, Surgery, Gerontology and Confidence interval.
His Cancer research integrates issues from Relative risk, Lung cancer, Epidemiology and Incidence.
His work in Odds ratio addresses issues such as Case-control study, which are connected to fields such as Single-nucleotide polymorphism.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (40.09%)
- Cohort study (35.41%)
- Cancer (29.64%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Cohort study (35.41%)
- Internal medicine (40.09%)
- Oncology (13.73%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Cohort study, Internal medicine, Oncology, Cancer and Cohort.
His Cohort study research includes themes of Odds ratio, Proportional hazards model, Hazard ratio, Lung cancer and Socioeconomic status.
Internal medicine and Gastroenterology are frequently intertwined in his study.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Gene expression, Case-control study and Pancreatic cancer.
The Cancer study combines topics in areas such as Relative risk, Incidence and Family history.
His research in Cohort intersects with topics in Diabetes mellitus, Obesity, End stage renal disease and Risk factor.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer. (149 citations)
- Association of oral microbiome with type 2 diabetes risk (59 citations)
- Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Prospective Studies (54 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Disease
Internal medicine, Cohort study, Cohort, Odds ratio and Cancer are his primary areas of study.
The various areas that William J. Blot examines in his Internal medicine study include Gastroenterology and Oncology.
William J. Blot has included themes like CDKN2A and Pancreatic cancer in his Gastroenterology study.
His Cohort study research integrates issues from Epidemiology, Gerontology, MEDLINE, Proportional hazards model and Socioeconomic status.
His Cohort study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Obesity, Diabetes mellitus, Lung cancer, Serology and Risk factor.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Genetics, Genome-wide association study and Allele.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
