World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 40 7414 7153 1341 1334 185 5633

Peng Dong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peng Dong between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peng Dong published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2025. 44 of the 208 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2025. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 43 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

208 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peng Dong: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 2
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
2013 2
2014 1
2015 6
2016 4
2017 3
2018 9
2019 10
2020 15
2021 17
2022 26
2023 35
2024 28
2025 43
2026 1
Total 208
Download as CSV

Peng Dong publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peng Dong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 185 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 185
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Peng Dong D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peng Dong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348 40
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Peng Dong is a researcher affiliated with Kunming University of Science and Technology in China. Their primary field of study is engineering, with a significant focus on electrical and electronic engineering. The research also spans mechanical engineering, industrial and manufacturing engineering, materials chemistry, and renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment. Their work includes a strong emphasis on advancements in battery technologies and recycling methods.

Peng Dong's recent publications cover topics related to battery materials and recycling processes. Notable papers include:

  • A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling, 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Direct Regeneration of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by the Molten Salts Method, 2020, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • Recycling of LiCoO2 cathode material from spent lithium ion batteries by ultrasonic enhanced leaching and one-step regeneration, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Advanced Electrolyte Design for High-Energy-Density Li-Metal Batteries under Practical Conditions, 2021, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Advanced Nonflammable Organic Electrolyte Promises Safer Li-Metal Batteries: From Solvation Structure Perspectives, 2022, Advanced Materials

The main research topics addressed by Peng Dong include:

  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Peng Dong frequently collaborates with several co-authors. The most common collaborators are:

  • Yingjie Zhang
  • Qi Meng
  • Xiaoyuan Zeng
  • Zitong Fei
  • Jie Xiao

The researcher's work is often published in a set of key venues. These include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Alloys and Compounds
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Ceramics International
  • Journal of Environmental Management

Peng Dong's contributions sit mainly at the intersection of engineering disciplines and materials chemistry with a focus on sustainable approaches, especially in the context of lithium-ion battery recycling and the design of battery materials. Their research outputs reflect ongoing developments in battery technologies, recycling methodologies, and electrolyte innovations for safer and more efficient energy storage solutions.

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling

    Seoa Kim;Jaeyeon Bang;Junsang Yoo;Youngjun Shin

  • Expanded biomass-derived hard carbon with ultra-stable performance in sodium-ion batteries

    Ziyi Zhu;Feng Liang;Zhongren Zhou;Xiaoyuan Zeng

  • Use of electrochemical cathode-reduction method for leaching of cobalt from spent lithium-ion batteries

    Qi Meng;Yingjie Zhang;Peng Dong

  • Honeycomb-like Hard Carbon Derived from Pine Pollen as High-Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries.

    Yanjia Zhang;Xue Li;Peng Dong;Gang Wu

  • Direct Regeneration of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries by the Molten Salts Method

    Guanghui Jiang;Yannan Zhang;Qi Meng;Yingjie Zhang

  • Electrochemical fabrication of porous Ni-Cu alloy nanosheets with high catalytic activity for hydrogen evolution

    M.Y. Gao;C. Yang;Q.B. Zhang;Y.W. Yu

  • Recycling of cathode material from spent lithium ion batteries using an ultrasound-assisted DL-malic acid leaching system.

    Peichao Ning;Qi Meng;Peng Dong;Jianguo Duan

  • Recycling of LiCoO2 cathode material from spent lithium ion batteries by ultrasonic enhanced leaching and one-step regeneration.

    Siyuan Zhou;Yingjie Zhang;Qi Meng;Peng Dong

  • Advanced Electrolyte Design for High-Energy-Density Li-Metal Batteries under Practical Conditions

    Shouyi Yuan;Shouyi Yuan;Taoyi Kong;Yiyong Zhang;Peng Dong

  • Advanced Nonflammable Organic Electrolyte Promises Safer Li‐Metal Batteries: From Solvation Structure Perspectives

    Unknown

  • Transition Metal Compounds Family for Li–S Batteries: The DFT‐Guide for Suppressing Polysulfides Shuttle

    Unknown

  • Stabilizing interface layer of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode materials under high voltage using p-toluenesulfonyl isocyanate as film forming additive

    Peng Dong;Ding Wang;Yao Yao;Xue Li

  • Selective lithium extraction of cathode materials from spent lithium-ion batteries via low-valent salt assisted roasting

    Unknown

  • Use of grape seed as reductant for leaching of cobalt from spent lithium-ion batteries

    Yingjie Zhang;Qi Meng;Peng Dong;Jianguo Duan

  • Design and facile synthesis of mesoporous cobalt nitride nanosheets modified by pyrolytic carbon for the nonenzymatic glucose detection

    Tingting Liu;Tingting Liu;Mian Li;Peng Dong;Yingjie Zhang

  • A sustainable closed-loop method of selective oxidation leaching and regeneration for lithium iron phosphate cathode materials from spent batteries

    Unknown

  • Direct regeneration of spent LiFePO4 cathode materials with pre-oxidation and V-doping

    Peiwen Liu;Yannan Zhang;Peng Dong;Yingjie Zhang

  • Design of ultralong-life Li–CO2 batteries with IrO2 nanoparticles highly dispersed on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes

    Gang Wu;Xue Li;Zhang Zhang;Peng Dong

  • A review of solid-state lithium metal batteries through in-situ solidification

    Unknown

  • A high performance direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell – A green pathway for brown coal utilization

    Hao Wu;Jie Xiao;Xiaoyuan Zeng;Xue Li

  • Direct regeneration of spent cathode materials by deep eutectic solvent

    Unknown

  • A novel process for leaching of metals from LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 material of spent lithium ion batteries: Process optimization and kinetics aspects

    Qi Meng;Yingjie Zhang;Peng Dong;Feng Liang

  • A Hierarchical Energy Management Strategy for Power-Split Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Considering Velocity Prediction

    Zheng Chen;Ningyuan Guo;Jiangwei Shen;Renxin Xiao

  • Cathode material LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2/LaPO4 with high electrochemical performance for lithium-ion batteries

    Hui Tong;Pengyuan Dong;Jiafeng Zhang;Junchao Zheng

  • Characterization of symmetrical SrFe0.75Mo0.25O3−δ electrodes in direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells

    Jie Xiao;Jie Xiao;Da Han;Fangyong Yu;Li Zhang

  • A novel strategy for realizing high nitrogen doping in Fe3C-embedded nitrogen and phosphorus-co-doped porous carbon nanowires: efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalysis in acidic electrolytes

    Mian Li;Yang Liu;Lina Han;Jie Xiao

  • IrO2 nanoparticles highly dispersed on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as an efficient cathode catalyst for high-performance Li-O2 batteries

    Yanjia Zhang;Xue Li;Mingyu Zhang;Shijun Liao

  • Beneficial effect of incorporating Ni-rich oxide and layered over-lithiated oxide into high-energy-density cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries

    Zhenping Qiu;Yingjie Zhang;Xuesong Huang;Jianguo Duan

  • Leaching kinetics and interface reaction of LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 materials from spent LIBs using GKB as reductant.

    Bowen Zhu;Yingjie Zhang;Yuling Zou;Zelong Yang

  • Regenerating the used LiFePO4 to high performance cathode via mechanochemical activation assisted V5+ doping

    Bin Xu;Peng Dong;Jianguo Duan;Ding Wang

  • Recycling of spent LiCoO2 materials by electrolytic leaching of cathode electrode plate

    Siyuan Zhou;Yingjie Zhang;Qi Meng;Peng Dong

Frequent Co-Authors

Yingjie Zhang
Yingjie Zhang Xiangtan University
Ding Wang
Ding Wang Peking University
Jinbao Zhao
Jinbao Zhao Xiamen University
Shi-Gang Sun
Shi-Gang Sun Xiamen University
Jiang Liu
Jiang Liu South China University of Technology
Feng Liang
Feng Liang Kunming University of Science and Technology
Xueliang Sun
Xueliang Sun University of Western Ontario
Ling Huang
Ling Huang Xiamen University
Deyu Wang
Deyu Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Gang Wu
Gang Wu Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. Many students and professionals complement their technical backgrounds with business, management, or administrative credentials to gain a competitive edge.

For those interested in financial operations, a bookkeeping certification online provides valuable skills in accounting and financial management—ideal for engineers wanting to understand the financial heartbeat of their projects.

Individuals looking to streamline operations may pursue an office administration degree, which builds essential skills in organization, communication, and office management.

Broader business knowledge can be acquired through a business administration degree online, enabling graduates to step into supervisory or managerial roles within tech-driven companies.

Aspiring leaders might consider a masters in organizational leadership to develop advanced skills in team leadership, change management, and strategic decision-making.

Exploring these pathways can help you combine technical expertise with business acumen, giving you flexibility and a broader range of career options within the engineering and technology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peng Dong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles