World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 55 2237 2010 1105 979 145 27837

Chad A. Cowan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chad A. Cowan between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chad A. Cowan published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2016. 6 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2016. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
2000 2025

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chad A. Cowan: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 6
2005 3
2006 1
2007 6
2008 7
2009 7
2010 6
2011 7
2012 8
2013 12
2014 13
2015 11
2016 15
2017 10
2018 8
2019 7
2020 15
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
2024 4
2025 2
Total 163
Download as CSV

Chad A. Cowan publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad A. Cowan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 137–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 145 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158 145
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Chad A. Cowan D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad A. Cowan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116 55
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Chad A. Cowan is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a substantial focus also on Medicine.

The scientist's subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Immunology, Genetics, Oncology, and Cancer Research. Their body of work covers diverse topics such as CAR-T cell therapy research, Immune Cell Function and Interaction, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Biochemical and Molecular Research, RNA modifications and cancer, T-cell and B-cell Immunology, and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities.

Chad A. Cowan has contributed to several recent publications, encompassing various aspects of molecular and cellular biology as well as disease-related research:

  • Allele-specific open chromatin in human iPSC neurons elucidates functional disease variants, 2020, Science
  • Identification of a combination of transcription factors that synergistically increases endothelial cell barrier resistance, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Inducers of the endothelial cell barrier identified through chemogenomic screening in genome-edited hPSC-endothelial cells, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cell-specific transcriptional control of mitochondrial metabolism by TIF1γ drives erythropoiesis, 2021, Science
  • Mitoregulin Controls β-Oxidation in Human and Mouse Adipocytes, 2020, Stem Cell Reports

Their frequent co-authors include Curtis R. Warren, Steven A. Carr, Haojie Yu, Mary H.C. Florido, and G. Grant Welstead, each of whom has collaborated in multiple publications with Cowan.

Chad A. Cowan has published frequently in venues such as Science, Cell Stem Cell, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Blood, and Scientific Reports. These journals reflect an emphasis on molecular biology and related biomedical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA

    Luigi Warren;Philip D. Manos;Philip D. Manos;Tim Ahfeldt;Tim Ahfeldt;Yuin-Han Loh

  • Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

    In Hyun Park;Natasha Arora;Hongguang Huo;Nimet Maherali

  • Nuclear Reprogramming of Somatic Cells After Fusion with Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Chad A. Cowan;Jocelyn Atienza;Douglas A. Melton;Kevin Eggan

  • From noncoding variant to phenotype via SORT1 at the 1p13 cholesterol locus

    Kiran Musunuru;Kiran Musunuru;Kiran Musunuru;Alanna Strong;Maria Frank-Kamenetsky;Noemi E. Lee

  • Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts.

    Chad A. Cowan;Irinha Klimanskaya;Jill Mcmahon;Jocelyn Atienza

  • Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains

    Manching Ku;Richard P. Koche;Richard P. Koche;Richard P. Koche;Esther Rheinbay;Esther Rheinbay;Esther Rheinbay;Eric M. Mendenhall;Eric M. Mendenhall

  • Marked differences in differentiation propensity among human embryonic stem cell lines

    Kenji Osafune;Kenji Osafune;Leslie Caron;Malgorzata Borowiak;Malgorzata Borowiak;Rita J Martinez;Rita J Martinez

  • A high-efficiency system for the generation and study of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

    Nimet Maherali;Tim Ahfeldt;Tim Ahfeldt;Alessandra Rigamonti;Jochen Utikal

  • Enhanced Efficiency of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Genome Editing through Replacing TALENs with CRISPRs

    Qiurong Ding;Stephanie Nicole Regan;Yulei Xia;Leoníe A. Oostrom

  • A TALEN Genome-Editing System for Generating Human Stem Cell-Based Disease Models

    Qiurong Ding;Youn-Kyoung Lee;Esperance Anne Kreek Schaefer;Derek Tilghman Peters

  • β-Aminoisobutyric Acid Induces Browning of White Fat and Hepatic β-Oxidation and Is Inversely Correlated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors

    Lee D. Roberts;Pontus Boström;Pontus Boström;John F. O’Sullivan;Robert T. Schinzel

  • Genome-wide Chromatin State Transitions Associated with Developmental and Environmental Cues

    Jiang Zhu;Mazhar Adli;James Y. Zou;Griet Verstappen;Griet Verstappen

  • Low Incidence of Off-Target Mutations in Individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN Targeted Human Stem Cell Clones Detected by Whole-Genome Sequencing

    Adrian Veres;Bridget S. Gosis;Qiurong Ding;Ryan Collins

  • Exome-wide association study of plasma lipids in > 300,000 individuals

    Dajiang J Liu;Gina M Peloso;Gina M Peloso;Haojie Yu;Adam S Butterworth;Adam S Butterworth

  • Generation of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells from human pluripotent stem cells

    Christoph Patsch;Ludivine Challet-Meylan;Eva C. Thoma;Eduard Urich

  • Efficient ablation of genes in human hematopoietic stem and effector cells using CRISPR/Cas9

    Pankaj Kumar Mandal;Pankaj Kumar Mandal;Leonardo Manuel Ramos Ferreira;Ryan Collins;Torsten B Meissner

  • Permanent Alteration of PCSK9 With In Vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing

    Qiurong Ding;Alanna Strong;Kevin M. Patel;Sze-Ling Ng

  • A comparison of non-integrating reprogramming methods.

    Thorsten M. Schlaeger;Laurence Marie Daheron;Thomas R Brickler;Samuel Entwisle

  • The SH2/SH3 adaptor Grb4 transduces B-ephrin reverse signals

    Chad A. Cowan;Mark Henkemeyer

  • Crystal structure of an Eph receptor-ephrin complex.

    Juha-Pekka Himanen;Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar;Martin Lackmann;Chad A. Cowan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kiran Musunuru
Kiran Musunuru University of Pennsylvania
Alexander Meissner
Alexander Meissner Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics
Douglas A. Melton
Douglas A. Melton Harvard University
Sekar Kathiresan
Sekar Kathiresan Harvard University
Jubao Duan
Jubao Duan University of Chicago
Alan R. Sanders
Alan R. Sanders NorthShore University HealthSystem
Pablo V. Gejman
Pablo V. Gejman NorthShore University HealthSystem
Robert E. Gerszten
Robert E. Gerszten Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Mark Henkemeyer
Mark Henkemeyer The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Derrick J. Rossi
Derrick J. Rossi Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring molecular biologists often explore interdisciplinary career options or pursue further education in related fields. For those interested in healthcare, molecular biology provides a strong foundation for roles such as speech-language pathology or nursing. Many students consider asha accredited slp programs to meet professional standards while learning online.

If you have a background in molecular biology or another science and wish to transition to speech-language pathology, there are transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors programs available online that offer flexible pathways for non-traditional students.

Interested in the nursing profession? There are a range of online bsn programs for non nurses designed to accelerate your entry into clinical practice—even if you don’t have a prior nursing degree.

Finally, those exploring advanced practice roles can investigate the earning potential in related sectors. For example, the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary varies by state, providing insight into career opportunities that combine biological sciences with mental health care.

Best Scientists Citing Chad A. Cowan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles