World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
40580
World Ranking
3751
National Ranking
134

Daniel J. Weiss publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel J. Weiss D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Theo Vos;Theo Vos;Theo Vos;Stephen S. Lim;Cristiana Abbafati;Cristiana Abbafati;Cristiana Abbafati;Kaja M. Abbas;Kaja M. Abbas;Kaja M. Abbas

  • Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

    Mohsen Naghavi;Amanuel Alemu Abajobir;Cristiana Abbafati;Kaja M Abbas

  • The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015

    S Bhatt;D J Weiss;E Cameron;D Bisanzio

  • A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015.

    D. J. Weiss;A. Nelson;H. S. Gibson;W. Temperley

  • Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality and life expectancy, 1950-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

    Daniel Dicker;Grant Nguyen;Degu Abate;Kalkidan Hassen Abate

  • Measuring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: a baseline analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

    Stephen S Lim;Kate Allen;Zulfiqar A Bhutta;Zulfiqar A Bhutta;Lalit Dandona;Lalit Dandona

  • Mapping the global prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Plasmodium falciparum, 2000–17: a spatial and temporal modelling study

    Daniel J Weiss;Tim C D Lucas;Michele Nguyen;Anita K Nandi

  • Mapping the global endemicity and clinical burden of Plasmodium vivax, 2000–17: a spatial and temporal modelling study

    Katherine E Battle;Tim C D Lucas;Michele Nguyen;Rosalind E Howes

  • Mapping the zoonotic niche of Ebola virus disease in Africa

    David M. Pigott;Nick Golding;Adrian Mylne;Zhi Huang

  • Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus

    Jane P. Messina;Moritz Ug G. Kraemer;Oliver J. Brady;David M. Pigott;David M. Pigott

  • Vulnerability to snakebite envenoming: a global mapping of hotspots.

    Joshua Longbottom;Joshua Longbottom;Joshua Longbottom;Freya M Shearer;Maria Devine;Gabriel Alcoba

  • Mapping under-5 and neonatal mortality in Africa, 2000–15: a baseline analysis for the Sustainable Development Goals

    Nick Golding;Roy Burstein;Joshua Longbottom;Annie J Browne

  • The global distribution of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever

    Jane P. Messina;David M. Pigott;Nick Golding;Kirsten A. Duda

  • Mapping child growth failure in Africa between 2000 and 2015

    A Osgood-Zimmerman;A I Millear;R W Stubbs;C Shields

  • Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria intervention coverage, morbidity, and mortality in Africa: a geospatial modelling analysis.

    Daniel J Weiss;Daniel J Weiss;Daniel J Weiss;Amelia Bertozzi-Villa;Susan F Rumisha;Susan F Rumisha;Punam Amratia

  • Mapping Geospatial Processes Affecting the Environmental Fate of Agricultural Pesticides in Africa.

    Chantal M. J. Hendriks;Harry S. Gibson;Anna Trett;André Python

  • An effective approach for gap-filling continental scale remotely sensed time-series

    Daniel J. Weiss;Peter M. Atkinson;Samir Bhatt;Bonnie Mappin

  • Mapping changes in housing in sub-Saharan Africa from 2000 to 2015

    Lucy S. Tusting;Donal Bisanzio;Graham Alabaster;Ewan Cameron

  • Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017.

    Samir Bhatt;Daniel J Weiss;Bonnie Mappin;Ursula Dalrymple

  • Alpine treeline of western North America: Linking organism-to-landscape dynamics

    George P. Malanson;David R. Butler;Daniel B. Fagre;Stephen J. Walsh

  • Access to intensive care in 14 European countries: a spatial analysis of intensive care need and capacity in the light of COVID-19.

    Jan Bauer;Dörthe Brüggmann;Doris Klingelhöfer;Werner Maier

  • Author response: Mapping the zoonotic niche of Ebola virus disease in Africa

    David M Pigott;Nick Golding;Adrian Mylne;Zhi Huang

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter W. Gething
Peter W. Gething Telethon Kids Institute
Simon I. Hay
Simon I. Hay University of Washington
Samir Bhatt
Samir Bhatt Imperial College London
David M. Pigott
David M. Pigott University of Washington
David L. Smith
David L. Smith University of Washington
Christopher J L Murray
Christopher J L Murray University of Washington
Moritz U G Kraemer
Moritz U G Kraemer University of Oxford
Ali H. Mokdad
Ali H. Mokdad University of Washington
Stephen S Lim
Stephen S Lim University of Washington
Nancy Fullman
Nancy Fullman University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many students benefit from affordable options, such as online general studies degree affordable programs, which offer flexibility and a multidisciplinary approach.

If you are considering advanced studies, exploring fully funded dsw programs online might be worthwhile, as these can complement environmental knowledge with social work expertise, essential for community-focused sustainability projects.

For those seeking career shifts or quicker degree completion, identifying the easiest bachelor degree to get online can help streamline education while still preparing students for environmental roles.

Specifically related to earth systems, pursuing a geologist degree online provides targeted knowledge in geology and geoscience, key fields for environmental analysis and natural resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Weiss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles