World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2616 2398 292 276 319 14524

Jim Orford publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jim Orford between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jim Orford published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2012. 13 of the 376 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2012. 1971: 2 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 12 publications
1971 2025

376 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jim Orford: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 2
1972 0
1973 2
1974 4
1975 5
1976 4
1977 4
1978 4
1979 0
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 3
1986 5
1987 3
1988 1
1989 0
1990 4
1991 1
1992 6
1993 7
1994 2
1995 2
1996 3
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 7
2001 10
2002 9
2003 16
2004 12
2005 13
2006 11
2007 8
2008 23
2009 12
2010 13
2011 20
2012 25
2013 18
2014 5
2015 4
2016 4
2017 8
2018 15
2019 15
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 19
2024 1
2025 12
Total 376
Download as CSV

Jim Orford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Orford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 311–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 319 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100 319
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jim Orford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Orford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jim Orford is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology, general health professions, and epidemiology. Additional areas of study include social psychology and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their main topics of research cover diverse social and health-related issues, including:

  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Jim Orford has contributed to several recent papers, which include:

  • A public health approach to gambling regulation: countering powerful influences, 2021, The Lancet Public Health
  • Setting Limits: Gambling, Science and Public Policy-summary of results, 2020, Addiction
  • The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries, 2021, BMJ Global Health
  • 'No evidence of harm' implies no evidence of safety: Framing the lack of causal evidence in gambling advertising research, 2023, Addiction
  • Prevalence and self-rated health and depression of family members affected by addictive disorders: results of a nation-wide cross-sectional study, 2022, Addiction

Frequent co-authors who have contributed alongside Jim Orford include:

  • Rebecca Cassidy
  • Gallus Bischof
  • Richard Velleman
  • May CI van Schalkwyk
  • Mark Petticrew

The most common publication venues where Jim Orford's work appears are:

  • Addiction
  • The Lancet Public Health
  • BMJ Global Health
  • BMJ
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Jim Orford has published books as well, including an upcoming title, The Psychology Of Economic Inequality, scheduled for 2025 with Springer International Publishing.

Best Publications

  • Excessive Appetites: A Psychological View of Addictions

    Jim Orford

  • Alcoholism: a controlled trial of "treatment" and "advice".

    Griffith Edwards;Jim Orford;Stella Egert;Sally Guthrie

  • Addiction in the family is a major but neglected contributor to the global burden of adult ill-health.

    Jim Orford;Richard Velleman;Guillermina Natera;Lorna Templeton

  • Addiction as excessive appetite.

    Jim Orford

  • Sociodemographic Correlates of Internet Gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey

    Mark Griffiths;Heather Wardle;Jim Orford;Kerry Sproston

  • The Experiences of Affected Family Members: a Summary of Two Decades of Qualitative Research

    Jim Orford;Richard Velleman;Alex Copello;Lorna Templeton

  • Family members affected by a close relative's addiction: The stress-strain-coping-support model

    Jim Orford;Alex Copello;Richard Velleman;Lorna Templeton

  • Coping with Alcohol and Drug Problems: The Experiences of Family Members in Three Contrasting Cultures

    Jim Orford;Guillermina Natera;Alex Copello;Carol Atkinson

  • Women's experiences of workplace bullying: changes in social relationships

    Sian E. Lewis;Jim Orford

  • Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

    Heather Wardle;Alison Moody;Mark Griffiths;Jim Orford

  • Addiction and the family: is it time for services to take notice of the evidence?

    Alex Copello;Jim Orford

  • Asking the right questions in the right way: the need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction.

    Jim Orford

  • Risk and Resilience: Adults Who Were the Children of Problem Drinkers

    Richard Velleman;Jim Orford

  • The families of problem drug users: a study of 50 close relatives

    Richard Velleman;Gerald Bennett;Tony Miller;Jim Orford

  • Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: a set of standardized questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain.

    Jim Orford;Lorna Templeton;Richard Velleman;Alex Copello

  • The Rules of Interpersonal Complementarity: Does Hostility Beget Hostility and Dominance, Submission?.

    Unknown

  • The clients' perspective on change during treatment for an alcohol problem: qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial.

    Jim Orford;Ray Hodgson;Alex Copello;Bev John

  • Abstinence or control: the outcome for excessive drinkers two years after consultation.

    Unknown

  • Ways of coping and the health of relatives facing drug and alcohol problems in Mexico and England

    Jim Orford;Guillermina Natera;Richard Velleman;Alex Copello

  • Systems Thinking as a Framework for Analyzing Commercial Determinants of Health

    Cécile Knai;Mark Petticrew;Nicholas Mays;Simon Capewell

  • Tolerate, engage or withdraw: a study of the structure of families coping with alcohol and drug problems in South West England and Mexico City

    Jim Orford;Guillermina Natera;Jill Davies;Adriana Nava

  • PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey: reliability, item response, factor structure and inter-scale agreement

    Jim Orford;Heather Wardle;Mark Griffiths;Kerry Sproston

  • Hypersexuality: implications for a theory of dependence.

    Jim Orford

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Velleman
Richard Velleman University of Bath
Ingeborg Rossow
Ingeborg Rossow Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Ray Hodgson
Ray Hodgson Alcohol Research UK
Ian Russell
Ian Russell Swansea University
Dermot P.B. McGovern
Dermot P.B. McGovern Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Hannu Alho
Hannu Alho University of Helsinki
Max Birchwood
Max Birchwood University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and career pathways. Many students choose to specialize further, such as pursuing a career as a school counselor. Becoming a school counselor requires meeting different state-specific requirements and often includes earning an advanced degree, completing supervised experience, and passing state-approved exams.

For example, review the requirements to be a school counselor in Alaska or explore the unique process for becoming a school counselor in Arizona. Each state’s pathways reflect varying licensure, certification, and educational standards.

You can also learn about the requirements to be a school counselor in Arkansas if you are considering working in that region, or research the rigorous California school counselor education requirements.

Whether you pursue online degrees or in-person programs, being informed about state-specific guidelines can help you plan your educational journey and future psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Orford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles