World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9104
World Ranking
5397
National Ranking
2468

David Casasent publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Casasent sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 731 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Casasent D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Casasent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

David Casasent is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their professional focus is within academic research at this institution.

In 1977, they were recognized as an SPIE Fellow, an award indicating their involvement in the field related to the International Society for Optics and Photonics.

Available data does not list recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues connected to David Casasent. Similarly, no specific book publications, detailed fields of study, or documented subfields associated with their work are provided.

The absence of listed main topics of work suggests that publicly shared information regarding specific research subjects is limited or unavailable.

Best Publications

  • Multivariant technique for multiclass pattern recognition.

    Charles F. Hester;David Casasent

  • Unified synthetic discriminant function computational formulation.

    David Casasent

  • Application Of The Liquid Crystal Light Valve To Real-Time Optical Data Processing

    W. P. Bleha;L. T. Lipton;E. Wiener-Avnear;J. Grinberg

  • New optical transforms for pattern recognition

    D. Casasent;D. Psaltis

  • Correlation synthetic discriminant functions.

    David Casasent;Wen-Thong Chang

  • An improvement on floating search algorithms for feature subset selection

    Songyot Nakariyakul;David P. Casasent

  • Minimum noise and correlation energy optical correlation filter.

    Gopalan Ravichandran;David Casasent

  • Invariance and neural nets

    E. Barnard;D. Casasent

  • Detection filters and algorithm fusion for ATR

    D. Casasent;Anqi Ye

  • Scale Invariant Optical Transform

    David Casasent;Demetri Psaltis

  • Radial basis function neural networks for nonlinear Fisher discrimination and Neyman&#151Pearson classification

    David Casasent;Xue-wen Chen

  • Optical residue arithmetic: a correlation approach

    Demetri Psaltis;David Casasent

  • A comparison between criterion functions for linear classifiers, with an application to neural nets

    E. Barnard;D. Casasent

  • Curved object location by Hough transformations and inversions

    David Casasent;Raghuram Krishnapuram

  • Wavelet and Gabor transforms for detection

    David P. Casasent;John Scott Smokelin;Anqi Ye

  • Fast JPDA multitarget tracking algorithm.

    James L. Fisher;David P. Casasent

  • Adaptive branch and bound algorithm for selecting optimal features

    Songyot Nakariyakul;David P. Casasent

  • Classifier and shift-invariant automatic target recognition neural networks

    David P. Casasent;Leonard M. Neiberg

  • An Investigation of Alternative Cache Organizations

    J. Bell;D. Casasent;C.G. Bell

  • Accurate Numerical Computation By Optical Convolution

    Demetri Psaltis;David Casasent;Deborah Neft;Mark Ca rlotto

Frequent Co-Authors

Demetri Psaltis
Demetri Psaltis École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Etienne Barnard
Etienne Barnard North-West University
B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar
B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar Carnegie Mellon University
Yu-Chiang Frank Wang
Yu-Chiang Frank Wang National Taiwan University
Xue-wen Chen
Xue-wen Chen Wayne State University
Brent L. Adams
Brent L. Adams Brigham Young University
Mohammad S. Alam
Mohammad S. Alam Texas A&M University – Kingsville
Gregory S. Rohrer
Gregory S. Rohrer Carnegie Mellon University
Anthony D. Rollett
Anthony D. Rollett Carnegie Mellon University
Patrick J. Grother
Patrick J. Grother National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of specialized career pathways, many of which can be accessed through online degrees. One popular option is a cyber security degree online, which prepares students to tackle digital threats in today’s technology-driven workplaces.

Another growing field is construction management, especially for those interested in the intersection of technology and building industries. Earning a masters in construction management online can equip you with skills to oversee complex construction projects using modern digital tools.

For students exploring different fields, affordable online criminal justice programs offer training in legal systems, security operations, and investigation techniques—many of which rely on technology today.

Similarly, online accounting degrees provide flexible pathways to roles in finance where data analytics and software expertise are crucial.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you find a pathway that matches your interests and career goals, all while building a strong technological foundation.

Best Scientists Citing David Casasent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles