World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4455
World Ranking
13604
National Ranking
528

Alan J. Hu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Hu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 126 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alan J. Hu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Hu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan J. Hu is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and focuses their research primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work spans a range of subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their recent publications reflect a strong engagement with topics such as Formal Methods in Verification, Logic, Programming, and Type Systems, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, AI-based Problem Solving and Planning, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Syed Muhammad Javed Iqbal, Nick Feng, Sam Bayless, Patrick Trentin, and Michael W. Whalen, indicating collaborative work across multiple projects.

Their research outputs have appeared consistently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Dagstuhl Research Online Publication Server, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, and Applied and Computational Engineering.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Integrating Signal Processing and Computational Creativity: A Theoretical Framework for Modern Music Composition" (2025, Applied and Computational Engineering)
  • "Scalable Precise Computation of Shannon Entropy" (2025, Dagstuhl Research Online Publication Server)
  • "DRAT Proofs of Unsatisfiability for SAT Modulo Monotonic Theories" (2024, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Gridiron: A Technique for Augmenting Cloud Workloads with Network Bandwidth Requirements" (2022, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Cache Abstraction for Data Race Detection in Heterogeneous Systems with Non-coherent Accelerators" (2022, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems)

Best Publications

  • Protocol verification as a hardware design aid

    D.L. Dill;A.J. Drexler;A.J. Hu;C.H. Yang

  • SPUDD: stochastic planning using decision diagrams

    Jesse Hoey;Robert St-Aubin;Alan Hu;Craig Boutilier

  • System-on-Chip: Reuse and Integration

    R. Saleh;S. Wilton;S. Mirabbasi;A. Hu

  • Calysto: scalable and precise extended static checking

    Domagoj Babic;Alan J. Hu

  • Boosting Verification by Automatic Tuning of Decision Procedures

    Frank Hutter;Domagoj Babic;Holger H. Hoos;Alan J. Hu

  • Checking for Language Inclusion Using Simulation Preorders

    David L. Dill;Alan J. Hu;Howard Wong-Toi

  • Monitor-Based Formal Specification of PCI

    Kanna Shimizu;David L. Dill;Alan J. Hu

  • Improving multiple-CMP systems using token coherence

    M.R. Marty;J.D. Bingham;M.D. Hill;A.J. Hu

  • BackSpace: Formal Analysis for Post-Silicon Debug

    F.M. De Paula;M. Gort;A.J. Hu;S. Wilton

  • Reducing BDD Size by Exploiting Functional Dependencies

    Alan J. Hu;David L. Dill

  • Structural abstraction of software verification conditions

    Domagoj Babic;Alan J. Hu

  • Automatic formal verification of DSP software

    T. David;W. Currie;A.J. Hu;S. Rajan

  • BDDNOW: A Parallel BDD Package

    Kim Milvang-Jensen;Alan J. Hu

  • New Techniques for Efficient Verification with Implicitly Conjoined BDDs

    Alan J. Hu;Gary York;David L. Dill

  • Approximate reachability with BDDs using overlapping projections

    Shankar G. Govindaraju;David L. Dill;Alan J. Hu;Mark A. Horowitz

  • High-level specification and automatic generation of IP interface monitors

    Marcio T. Oliveira;Alan J. Hu

  • Formal hardware verification with BDDs: an introduction

    A.J. Hu

  • Fixing races for fun and profit: how to use access(2)

    Drew Dean;Alan J. Hu

  • Higher-Level Specification and Verification with BDDs

    Alan J. Hu;David L. Dill;Andreas Drexler;C. Han Yang

  • Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design

    Joel Phillips;Alan J. Hu;Helmut Graeb

  • Bridging pre-silicon verification and post-silicon validation

    Amir Nahir;Avi Ziv;Miron Abramovici;Albert Camilleri

Frequent Co-Authors

Holger H. Hoos
Holger H. Hoos RWTH Aachen University
Steven J. E. Wilton
Steven J. E. Wilton University of British Columbia
Anne Condon
Anne Condon University of British Columbia
David L. Dill
David L. Dill Stanford University
Andre Ivanov
Andre Ivanov University of British Columbia
Ivan Beschastnikh
Ivan Beschastnikh University of British Columbia
Jesse Hoey
Jesse Hoey University of Waterloo
Byron Cook
Byron Cook Amazon (United States)
Craig Boutilier
Craig Boutilier Google (United States)
Shaz Qadeer
Shaz Qadeer Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science can open the door to a wide range of online degrees and specialized certifications. Many students pair their studies with certifications for jobs in areas such as cybersecurity or cloud computing. These credentials can quickly boost your employability and salary prospects, even before you finish your main degree.

If you're seeking flexibility and a faster route to advancement, consider quick masters degrees online. These accelerated programs allow you to earn your advanced degree while balancing work and other commitments, helping you climb the career ladder sooner.

Certain degrees are especially valuable in today’s job market. For example, Computer Science, Data Science, and AI are consistently listed among which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Such degrees are highly respected and can significantly enhance career prospects.

Finally, tech-related fields often overlap. Exploring online electrical engineering career outcomes can help computer science students discover additional pathways and industries where their skills are in demand.

Best Scientists Citing Alan J. Hu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles