World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
4003
World Ranking
8986
National Ranking
4757

Nancy M. Docherty publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy M. Docherty sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nancy M. Docherty D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy M. Docherty sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nancy M. Docherty is affiliated with Kent State University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Health Professions and Psychology, with specific subfields including General Health Professions, Social Psychology, and Pharmacy.

Their recent scholarly output includes a paper titled "Talking about Health: A Topic Analysis of Narratives from Individuals with Schizophrenia and Other Serious Mental Illnesses," published in 2022 in the journal Behavioral Sciences. This paper has been cited six times.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Nancy M. Docherty include:

  • Tovah Cowan
  • Zachary Rodriguez
  • Ole Edvard Granrud
  • Michael D. Masucci
  • Alex S. Cohen

Publication venues where Docherty's work appears are focused, with Behavioral Sciences being a noted outlet.

The main research topics covered by Docherty's work encompass:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Obesity and Health Practices

Best Publications

  • Communication Disturbances in Schizophrenia and Mania

    Nancy M. Docherty;Maddalena DeRosa;Nancy C. Andreasen

  • Cognitive Deficits and Thought Disorder: II. An 8-month Followup Study

    Philip D. Harvey;Nancy M. Docherty;Mark R. Serper;Myrna Rasmussen

  • Working memory, attention, and communication disturbances in schizophrenia.

    Nancy M. Docherty;Keith A. Hawkins;Ralph E. Hoffman;Donald M. Quinlan

  • Cognition, negative symptoms, and diagnosis: a comparison of schizophrenic, bipolar, and control samples.

    Keith A. Hawkins;Ralph E. Hoffman;Donald M. Quinlan;Jaak Rakfeldt

  • Immediate memory, attention and communication disturbances in schizophrenia patients and their relatives

    Nancy M. Docherty;Scott W. Gordinier

  • Affective reactivity of language in schizophrenia.

    Nancy M. Docherty;Ian M. Evans;William H. Sledge;John P. Seibyl

  • Cognitive Impairments and Disordered Speech in Schizophrenia: Thought Disorder, Disorganization, and Communication Failure Perspectives.

    Nancy M. Docherty

  • Computerized measurement of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

    Alex S. Cohen;Murray Alpert;Tasha M. Nienow;Thomas J. Dinzeo

  • Life Events and High-Trait Reactivity Together Predict Psychotic Symptom Increases in Schizophrenia

    Nancy M. Docherty;Annie St-Hilaire;Jennifer M. Aakre;James P. Seghers

  • Stability of formal thought disorder and referential communication disturbances in schizophrenia.

    Nancy M. Docherty;Alex S. Cohen;Tasha M. Nienow;Thomas J. Dinzeo

  • Affective reactivity of speech in schizophrenia patients and their nonschizophrenic relatives

    Nancy M. Docherty;Michael J. Hall;Scott W. Gordinier

  • Reference Performance and Positive and Negative Thought Disorder: A Follow-Up Study of Manics and Schizophrenics

    Nancy Docherty;Margo Schnur;Philip D. Harvey

  • Affective reactivity of speech and emotional experience in patients with schizophrenia

    Alex S Cohen;Nancy M Docherty

  • Predicting social functioning in schizotypy: an investigation of the relative contributions of theory of mind and mood.

    Amanda McCleery;Marielle Divilbiss;Annie St-Hilaire;Jennifer M Aakre

  • Schizophrenia and the Sense of Self

    Aubrey M. Moe;Nancy M. Docherty

  • Schizophrenic Patients' Perceptions of Stress, Expressed Emotion, and Sensitivity To Criticism

    Linda P. Cutting;Jennifer M. Aakre;Nancy M. Docherty

  • Attributional style in delusional patients: a comparison of remitted paranoid, remitted nonparanoid, and current paranoid patients with nonpsychiatric controls.

    Jennifer M. Aakre;James P. Seghers;Annie St-Hilaire;Nancy Docherty

  • Communication Disturbances in Relatives Beyond the Age of Risk for Schizophrenia and Their Associations With Symptoms in Patients

    Nancy M. Docherty;Scott W. Gordinier;Michael J. Hall;Linda P. Cutting

  • Affective reactivity of symptoms as a process discriminator in schizophrenia.

    Nancy M. Docherty

  • Comparative affective reactivity of different types of communication disturbances in schizophrenia.

    Nancy M. Docherty;Anthony S. Hebert

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University
Bruce E. Wexler
Bruce E. Wexler Yale University
Philip D. Harvey
Philip D. Harvey University of Miami
Christian Grillon
Christian Grillon National Institutes of Health
Keith A. Hawkins
Keith A. Hawkins Yale University
Ralph E. Hoffman
Ralph E. Hoffman Yale University
Donald M. Quinlan
Donald M. Quinlan Yale University
Murray Alpert
Murray Alpert New York University
Maria S. Zaragoza
Maria S. Zaragoza Kent State University
Nancy C. Andreasen
Nancy C. Andreasen University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to various rewarding online degrees and career pathways. One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling. With mental health and addiction challenges on the rise, qualified counselors are in high demand across the country.

Many students considering online psychology programs are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fresno, which requires meeting specific educational and licensing requirements. Similarly, Garland substance abuse counselor certification requirements highlight the importance of both state certifications and practical training experience.

While requirements can vary by location, aspiring professionals can find detailed guidance on substance abuse counselor requirements in Gilbert, including degree prerequisites, internships, and required exams. For those drawn to a career in behavioral health, there are also resources on becoming a substance abuse counselor in Glendale that cover necessary steps for career entry.

Ultimately, studying psychology online prepares graduates for diverse roles in counseling, mental health services, social work, and more, helping them contribute positively to individuals and communities in need.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy M. Docherty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles