World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
78
Citations
44938
World Ranking
1163
National Ranking
617

David L. Dill publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Dill sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 230 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David L. Dill D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Dill sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For the development of techniques to verify hardware, software, and electronic voting systems.
  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2005 - ACM Fellow For contributions to system verification and for leadership in the development of verifiable voting systems.
  • 1932 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David L. Dill is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, notably in computer science and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including blockchain technology applications and security, logic, programming, and type systems, as well as formal methods in verification.

Their work covers a range of specialized subfields such as artificial intelligence, molecular biology, information systems, computational theory and mathematics, and genetics. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in their diverse research output.

David L. Dill has published recent papers in various scientific journals and conferences, including:

  • The m 6 A RNA demethylase FTO is a HIF-independent synthetic lethal partner with the VHL tumor suppressor (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Reluplex: a calculus for reasoning about deep neural networks (2021, Formal Methods in System Design)
  • Aquila enables reference-assisted diploid personal genome assembly and comprehensive variant detection based on linked reads (2021, Nature Communications)
  • High Throughput Computational Mouse Genetic Analysis (2020, bioRxiv - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Aquila_stLFR: diploid genome assembly based structural variant calling package for stLFR linked-reads (2021, Bioinformatics Advances)

Frequent publication venues for David L. Dill include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Formal Methods in System Design
  • Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David L. Dill are:

  • Clark Barrett
  • Shaz Qadeer
  • Wolfgang Grieskamp
  • Junkil Park
  • Yoni Zohar

The scientist's primary fields of research include:

  • Computer Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these, their subfields of study are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Molecular Biology
  • Information Systems
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Genetics

Main topics addressed in their research are:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Cancer-related gene regulation

David L. Dill has received several recognitions, including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2013)
  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering (2013) for the development of techniques to verify hardware, software, and electronic voting systems
  • ACM Fellow (2005) for contributions to system verification and leadership in verifiable voting systems development
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Best Publications

  • A theory of timed automata

    Rajeev Alur;David L. Dill

  • Symbolic model checking: 10/sup 20/ states and beyond

    J.R. Burch;E.M. Clarke;K.L. McMillan;D.L. Dill

  • EXE: Automatically Generating Inputs of Death

    Cristian Cadar;Vijay Ganesh;Peter M. Pawlowski;David L. Dill

  • Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networks

    Guy Katz;Clark W. Barrett;David L. Dill;Kyle Julian

  • Automata for modeling real-time systems

    Rajeev Alur;David L. Dill

  • Model-checking for real-time systems

    R. Alur;C. Courcoubetis;D. Dill

  • Model-Checking in Dense Real-Time

    R. Alur;C. Courcoubetis;D. Dill

  • Timing assumptions and verification of finite-state concurrent systems

    David L. Dill

  • Symbolic model checking for sequential circuit verification

    J.R. Burch;E.M. Clarke;D.E. Long;K.L. McMillan

  • A decision procedure for bit-vectors and arrays

    Vijay Ganesh;David L. Dill

  • Automatic verification of Pipelined Microprocessor Control

    Jerry R. Burch;David L. Dill

  • Trace Theory for Automatic Hierarchical Verification of Speed-Independent Circuits

    David L. Dill

  • Better Verification Through Symmetry

    C. Norris Ip;David L. Dill

  • Sequential circuit verification using symbolic model checking

    J. R. Burch;E. M. Clarke;K. L. McMillan;David L. Dill

  • Protocol verification as a hardware design aid

    D.L. Dill;A.J. Drexler;A.J. Hu;C.H. Yang

  • CMC: a pragmatic approach to model checking real code

    Madanlal Musuvathi;David Y. W. Park;Andy Chou;Dawson R. Engler

  • Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations

    Robert V. Bruggner;Bernd Bodenmiller;David L. Dill;Robert J. Tibshirani

  • The Marabou Framework for Verification and Analysis of Deep Neural Networks

    Guy Katz;Derek A. Huang;Duligur Ibeling;Kyle Julian

  • The Mur ϕ verification system

    David L. Dill

  • The Theory of Timed Automata

    Rajeev Alur;David L. Dill

  • Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervision

    Daniel Selsam;Matthew Lamm;Benedikt Bünz;Percy Liang

Frequent Co-Authors

Clark Barrett
Clark Barrett Stanford University
Gary Peltz
Gary Peltz Stanford University
Steven M. Nowick
Steven M. Nowick Columbia University
Rajeev Alur
Rajeev Alur University of Pennsylvania
Costas Courcoubetis
Costas Courcoubetis Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Alan J. Hu
Alan J. Hu University of British Columbia
Mark Horowitz
Mark Horowitz Stanford University
Dawson Engler
Dawson Engler Stanford University
Robert Tibshirani
Robert Tibshirani Stanford University
Andrew J. Gentles
Andrew J. Gentles Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science often leads students to consider related technical fields and flexible study options. Many prospective professionals opt for specialized online degrees to broaden their expertise. For example, a physics degree online is ideal for those interested in the fundamentals of computation and quantitative analysis.

Another popular choice is data analytics. Accredited data science degrees provide vital skills for today’s data-driven industries. Similarly, technical fields like electrical engineering are increasingly accessible through online electrical engineering courses USA, making it easier for working adults or international students to advance their careers.

For those aiming to quickly enter the workforce, 3-month certificate programs that pay well offer a fast-track into high-demand tech positions. Each of these pathways can complement traditional computer science study or serve as a stepping stone into specialized or emerging tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Dill

Trending Scientists