World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Spain
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
19442
World Ranking
3023
National Ranking
76

María José Sanz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María José Sanz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

María José Sanz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María José Sanz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Spain Leader Award

Overview

María José Sanz is affiliated with the Basque Centre for Climate Change in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on global and planetary change. Throughout their career, they have contributed extensively to several interconnected subfields including economics and econometrics, atmospheric science, plant science, and ecology.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics related to climate and environmental dynamics, specifically:

  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Their recent publications reflect diverse concerns within these spheres, including the following:

  • "Environmental and social consequences of the increase in the demand for 'superfoods' world-wide" (2020) published in People and Nature
  • "Harmonising the land-use flux estimates of global models and national inventories for 2000-2020" (2023) in Earth system science data
  • "Future impacts of ozone driven damages on agricultural systems" (2020) featured in Atmospheric Environment
  • "Assessment of sustainable land management practices in Mediterranean rural regions" (2020) from the Journal of Environmental Management
  • "Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets" (2021) published in Nature Food

María José Sanz frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Itxaso Ruiz, Giacomo Grassi, Alessandro Cescatti, Sandro Federici, and Clemens Schwingshackl. Their contributions often appear in specific scientific venues where Sanz maintains a significant publication record. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • PLOS Climate
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Biogeosciences
  • People and Nature

Their multidisciplinary approach integrates environmental science with economic modeling and policy analysis, addressing crucial issues related to climate change impacts, land management, and atmospheric processes. This synthesis of topics and fields contributes to an integrated understanding of ecological and atmospheric interactions relevant to climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.

Best Publications

  • Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003

    Ph. Ciais;M. Reichstein;N. Viovy;A. Granier

  • On the Separation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Ecosystem Respiration: Review and Improved Algorithm

    Markus Reichstein;Eva Falge;Dennis Baldocchi;Dario Papale

  • CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Sebastiaan Luyssaert;I. Inglima;M. Jung;A. D. Richardson

  • Reduction Of Ecosystem Productivity And Respiration During The European Summer 2003 Climate Anomaly: A Joint Flux Tower, Remote Sensing And Modelling Analysis

    M. Reichstein;M. Reichstein;Philippe Ciais;D. Papale;R. Valentini

  • Partitioning European grassland net ecosystem CO2 exchange into gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration using light response function analysis

    T. G. Gilmanov;J. F. Soussana;L. Aires;V. Allard

  • Spatial and temporal variations in airborne particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) across Spain 1999–2005

    X. Querol;A. Alastuey;T. Moreno;M.M. Viana

  • Ozone Cycles in the Western Mediterranean Basin: Interpretation of Monitoring Data in Complex Coastal Terrain

    Millán M. Millán;Enrique Mantilla;Rosa Salvador;Adoración Carratalá

  • Management effects on net ecosystem carbon and GHG budgets at European crop sites

    Eric Ceschia;Pierre Béziat;Jean-François Dejoux;M. Aubinet

  • Strategies for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in Mediterranean agriculture: a review.

    A. Sanz-Cobena;L. Lassaletta;E. Aguilera;A. del Prado

  • Quality control of CarboEurope flux data. Part 1: Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems

    Mathias Göckede;Mathias Göckede;Thomas Foken;Marc Aubinet;Mika Aurela

  • A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords

    B. Schlamadinger;N. Bird;T. Johns;T. Johns;S. Brown

  • Promoting the O3 flux concept for European forest trees

    R. Matyssek;A. Bytnerowicz;P.-E. Karlsson;E. Paoletti

  • Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO2 sinks

    Giacomo Grassi;Jo House;Werner A. Kurz;Alessandro Cescatti

  • Factoring out natural and indirect human effects on terrestrial carbon sources and sinks

    Josep G. Canadell;Miko U.F. Kirschbaum;Werner A. Kurz;María José Sanz

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: Implications of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology

    E.-D. Schulze;R. Valentini;M.-J. Sanz

  • Productivity, Respiration, and Light-Response Parameters of World Grassland and Agroecosystems Derived From Flux-Tower Measurements

    Tagir G Gilmanov;L Aires;Z Barcza;V S Baron

  • The net biome production of full crop rotations in Europe

    W. L. Kutsch;M. Aubinet;N. Buchmann;P. Smith

  • Atmospheric dynamics and ozone cycles related to nitrogen deposition in the western Mediterranean.

    Millán M Millán;M José Sanz;Rosa Salvador;Enrique Mantilla

  • Biotic, abiotic, and management controls on the net ecosystem CO2 exchange of European mountain grassland ecosystems

    Georg Wohlfahrt;Margaret Anderson-Dunn;Michael Bahn;Manuela Balzarolo

Frequent Co-Authors

Franco Miglietta
Franco Miglietta National Research Council (CNR)
Arnaud Carrara
Arnaud Carrara University of Antwerp
Riccardo Valentini
Riccardo Valentini Tuscia University
Werner Eugster
Werner Eugster ETH Zurich
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Marc Aubinet
Marc Aubinet University of Liège
Denis Loustau
Denis Loustau International Sleep Products Association
Giorgio Matteucci
Giorgio Matteucci National Research Council (CNR)
Eddy Moors
Eddy Moors Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Environmental Sciences can open diverse career pathways. Many students start with flexible undergraduate options, finding programs like the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get appealing when balancing studies with work or personal commitments.

For those interested in broadening their knowledge beyond environmental science, affordable options such as the most affordable online general studies degree programs provide valuable interdisciplinary education. This approach builds a strong foundation for multiple career opportunities.

Advanced degrees also play a pivotal role. Social work and community advocacy often intersect with environmental issues, and pursuing a specialized education through programs like the cheapest online dsw programs enables graduates to address social-environmental challenges at higher levels.

For educators aiming to incorporate environmental topics into their teaching, transitioning from teaching credentials to advanced degrees can be seamless with options like the eds to edd bridge program. This pathway enhances expertise and leadership potential in educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing María José Sanz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles