World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 46 2624 2436 163 144 71 11770

Marcel Bucher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcel Bucher between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcel Bucher published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2019. 4 of the 75 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2019. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1993 2025

75 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcel Bucher: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 2
2012 1
2013 3
2014 3
2015 3
2016 5
2017 1
2018 1
2019 6
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 2
2024 1
2025 3
Total 75
Download as CSV

Marcel Bucher publications per year - data summary

  • Marcel Bucher, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from University of Cologne, has 75 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 6 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 2.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.3 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 11 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 22 publications (2.0 per year); 2004-2014: 24 publications (2.2 per year); 2015-2025: 29 publications (2.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marcel Bucher publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Bucher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–75 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 71 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153 71
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Marcel Bucher publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 88 ranges running from 36–40 to 467+ publications.
  • Marcel Bucher, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from University of Cologne, records 71 publications - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than Marcel Bucher, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 136–140 publications range, and Marcel Bucher ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 111–115 publications, holding 255 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 55% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 141–145 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 467 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Marcel Bucher D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Bucher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158 46
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Marcel Bucher D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 6,494 Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 80 ranges running from 30 to 109+ D-Index.
  • Marcel Bucher, a Plant Science and Agronomy scholar from University of Cologne, records 46 D-Index - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Plant Science and Agronomy scientists score the same or lower than Marcel Bucher, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Marcel Bucher ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 288 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 66% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 49 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • Botany

Marcel Bucher mainly focuses on Botany, Mycorrhiza, Symbiosis, Biochemistry and Nutrient. His Botany research incorporates themes from Arabidopsis thaliana and Gene. His Mycorrhiza research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Complementation, Gene rearrangement, Reporter gene and Fungus.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Colletotrichum, Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense, Host and Colonization in addition to Symbiosis. In the field of Biochemistry, his study on Root hair, cDNA library, Chloroplast and Mitochondrion overlaps with subjects such as Ion transporter. His studies in Nutrient integrate themes in fields like Phosphate transport and Fertilizer.

His most cited work include:

  • Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces (492 citations)
  • Potential for increasing the content and bioavailability of Fe, Zn and Ca in plants for human nutrition. (400 citations)
  • Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants. (384 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Symbiosis, Biochemistry, Gene and Mycorrhiza. Marcel Bucher has researched Botany in several fields, including Nutrient, Phosphate and Cell biology. His Symbiosis study combines topics in areas such as Fungus and Colonization.

The Gene expression, Pyruvate decarboxylase, Transporter and Nucleotide research Marcel Bucher does as part of his general Biochemistry study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Vacuole, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His research in Gene intersects with topics in Phytoremediation and Herbaceous plant. His Mycorrhiza research includes elements of Solanum, Solanum tuberosum and Solanaceae.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (60.87%)
  • Symbiosis (43.48%)
  • Biochemistry (39.13%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Symbiosis (43.48%)
  • Botany (60.87%)
  • Nutrient (17.39%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Symbiosis, Botany, Nutrient, Host and Rhizophagus irregularis. His work on Lotus japonicus as part of general Symbiosis research is often related to Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, thus linking different fields of science. His Botany study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Rhizosphere and Microbial population biology.

The Nutrient study combines topics in areas such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassicaceae, Starvation response and Bulk soil. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Colonisation, focusing on Gene and, on occasion, Evolutionary biology. His work on Nucleotide and Phosphate as part of general Biochemistry research is frequently linked to Lipid biosynthesis, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • AP2 transcription factor CBX1 with a specific function in symbiotic exchange of nutrients in mycorrhizal Lotus japonicus (20 citations)
  • Plant‐mediated effects of soil phosphorus on the root‐associated fungal microbiota in Arabidopsis thaliana (17 citations)
  • Natural variation at OsCERK1 regulates arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in rice. (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Enzyme
  • Botany

His main research concerns Symbiosis, Botany, Nutrient, Gene and Colonisation. His Symbiosis study overlaps with Olpidium brassicae and Lipid biosynthesis. His Olpidium brassicae research includes a combination of various areas of study, such as Starvation response, Bulk soil, Brassicaceae and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Heterologous expression, Periarbuscular membrane, Fatty acid synthesis, Promoter and Biochemistry are fields of study that intersect with his Lipid biosynthesis research. Marcel Bucher has included themes like Transcription factor and Lotus japonicus in his Heterologous expression study. In his works, he conducts interdisciplinary research on Gene and Rhizophagus irregularis.

Best Publications

  • Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces

    Marcel Bucher

  • Potential for increasing the content and bioavailability of Fe, Zn and Ca in plants for human nutrition.

    Emmanuel Frossard;Marcel Bucher;Felix Mächler;Ahmad Mozafar

  • Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants.

    Christine Rausch;Marcel Bucher

  • Root Endophyte Colletotrichum tofieldiae Confers Plant Fitness Benefits that Are Phosphate Status Dependent

    Kei Hiruma;Kei Hiruma;Nina Gerlach;Soledad Sacristán;Ryohei Thomas Nakano;Ryohei Thomas Nakano

  • A phosphate transporter expressed in arbuscule-containing cells in potato

    Christine Rausch;Pierre Daram;Silvia Brunner;Jan Jansa

  • Symbiotic phosphate transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas

    Vladimir Karandashov;Vladimir Karandashov;Marcel Bucher

  • Phosphate systemically inhibits development of arbuscular mycorrhiza in Petunia hybrida and represses genes involved in mycorrhizal functioning

    Florence Breuillin;Jonathan Schramm;Mohammad Hajirezaei;Amir Ahkami

  • Phosphate Transport and Homeostasis in Arabidopsis

    Yves Poirier;Marcel Bucher

  • The characterization of novel mycorrhiza-specific phosphate transporters from Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum uncovers functional redundancy in symbiotic phosphate transport in solanaceous species

    Réka Nagy;Vladimir Karandashov;Véronique Chague;Katsiaryna Kalinkevich

  • Insight into the evolution of the Solanaceae from the parental genomes of Petunia hybrida.

    Aureliano Bombarely;Michel Moser;Avichai Moshe Amrad;Manzhu Bao

  • Preferential expression of an ammonium transporter and of two putative nitrate transporters in root hairs of tomato

    Frank-Roman Lauter;Olaf Ninnemann;Marcel Bucher;Jorg W. Riesmeier

  • Functional analysis and cell-specific expression of a phosphate transporter from tomato

    Pierre Daram;Silvia Brunner;Bengt L. Persson;Nikolaus Amrhein

  • Root-associated fungal microbiota of nonmycorrhizal Arabis alpina and its contribution to plant phosphorus nutrition.

    Juliana Almario;Ganga Jeena;Joerg Wunder;Gregor Langen

  • Pht2;1 encodes a low-affinity phosphate transporter from Arabidopsis.

    Pierre Daram;Silvia Brunner;Christine Rausch;Cyrill Steiner

  • Differential regulation of five Pht1 phosphate transporters from maize (Zea mays L.).

    R. Nagy;M. J. V. Vasconcelos;S. Zhao;J. McElver

  • Mycorrhizal phosphate uptake pathway in tomato is phosphorus-repressible and transcriptionally regulated.

    Réka Nagy;David Drissner;Nikolaus Amrhein;Iver Jakobsen

  • Evolutionary conservation of a phosphate transporter in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

    Vladimir Karandashov;Réka Nagy;Sarah Wegmüller;Nikolaus Amrhein

  • Lipid exchanges drove the evolution of mutualism during plant terrestrialization

    Mélanie K. Rich;Nicolas Vigneron;Cyril Libourel;Jean Keller

  • Network of GRAS Transcription Factors Involved in the Control of Arbuscule Development in Lotus japonicus

    Li Xue;Haitao Cui;Benjamin Buer;Vinod Vijayakumar

  • Lyso-Phosphatidylcholine Is a Signal in the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis

    David Drissner;Gernot Kunze;Nico Callewaert;Nico Callewaert;Peter Gehrig

  • Structure and expression profile of the phosphate Pht1 transporter gene family in mycorrhizal Populus trichocarpa

    Verónica Loth-Pereda;Elena Orsini;Pierre-Emmanuel Courty;Frédéric Lota

Frequent Co-Authors

Cris Kuhlemeier
Cris Kuhlemeier University of Bern
Uwe Scholz
Uwe Scholz Leibniz Association
Pierre-Emmanuel Courty
Pierre-Emmanuel Courty INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Iver Jakobsen
Iver Jakobsen University of Copenhagen
Jan Jansa
Jan Jansa Czech Academy of Sciences
Michel Chalot
Michel Chalot University of Franche-Comté
Uwe Sonnewald
Uwe Sonnewald University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Francis Martin
Francis Martin University of Lorraine
Bettina Hause
Bettina Hause Leibniz Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Marcel Bucher

Trending Scientists