World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

F. Andrew Smith publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Andrew Smith sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

F. Andrew Smith D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Andrew Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas in Plant Nutrition and Growth: New Paradigms from Cellular to Ecosystem Scales

    Sally E. Smith;F. Andrew Smith

  • Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas in Plant Phosphorus Nutrition: Interactions between Pathways of Phosphorus Uptake in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Roots Have Important Implications for Understanding and Manipulating Plant Phosphorus Acquisition

    Sally E. Smith;Iver Jakobsen;Mette Grønlund;F. Andrew Smith

  • Mycorrhizal fungi can dominate phosphate supply to plants irrespective of growth responses.

    Sally E. Smith;F. Andrew Smith;Iver Jakobsen

  • Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture

    Alan E. Richardson;Alan E. Richardson;Jonathan P. Lynch;Peter R. Ryan;Emmanuel Delhaize

  • Functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: the contribution of the mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal responses in growth or total P uptake

    Sally E. Smith;F. Andrew Smith;Iver Jakobsen

  • NITROGEN ASSIMILATION AND TRANSPORT IN VASCULAR LAND PLANTS IN RELATION TO INTRACELLULAR pH REGULATION

    J. A. Raven;F. A. Smith

  • Intracellular PH and its Regulation

    F. Andrew Smith;John A. Raven

  • Plant performance in stressful environments: interpreting new and established knowledge of the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas

    Sally E. Smith;Evelina Facelli;Suzanne Pope;F. Andrew Smith

  • Are there benefits of simultaneous root colonization by different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

    Jan Jansa;Jan Jansa;F. Andrew Smith;Sally E. Smith

  • Arsenic Sequestration in Iron Plaque, Its Accumulation and Speciation in Mature Rice Plants (Oryza Sativa L.)

    W. J. Liu;Y. G. Zhu;Y. Hu;P. N. Williams

  • Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth

    Sally E. Smith;F. Andrew Smith

  • Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species.

    Long Li;Jianhao Sun;Fusuo Zhang;Tianwen Guo

  • Strategies and agronomic interventions to improve the phosphorus-use efficiency of farming systems

    Richard J. Simpson;Astrid Oberson;Richard A. Culvenor;Megan H. Ryan

  • Structure and function of the interfaces in biotrophic symbioses as they relate to nutrient transport.

    S. E. Smith;F. A. Smith

  • Do phosphorus nutrition and iron plaque alter arsenate (As) uptake by rice seedlings in hydroponic culture

    W.‐J. Liu;W.‐J. Liu;Y.‐G. Zhu;Y.‐G. Zhu;F. A. Smith;S. E. Smith

  • Do iron plaque and genotypes affect arsenate uptake and translocation by rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) grown in solution culture

    Liu Wj;Zhu Yg;Smith Fa;Smith Se

  • More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses

    F. Andrew Smith;Emily J. Grace;Sally E. Smith

  • Geographic variation of southeastern Pacific intertidal communities

    Bernardo R. Broitman;Sergio A. Navarrete;Franz Smith;Steven D. Gaines

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence plant diversity and community structure in a semiarid herbland

    Patrick J. O’Connor;Sally E. Smith;F. Andrew Smith

  • What is the significance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of many economically important crop plants

    F. Andrew Smith;Sally E. Smith

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to phosphorus uptake by wheat grown in a phosphorus‐fixing soil even in the absence of positive growth responses

    Huiying Li;Sally E. Smith;Robert E. Holloway;Robert E. Holloway;Yongguan Zhu;Yongguan Zhu

  • P metabolism and transport in AM fungi

    Tatsuhiro Ezawa;Sally E. Smith;F. Andrew Smith

  • Arsenic uptake and toxicity in plants: integrating mycorrhizal influences

    Sally E. Smith;Helle M. Christophersen;Suzanne Pope;F. Andrew Smith

  • Sulfur (S)-induced enhancement of iron plaque formation in the rhizosphere reduces arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings

    Zheng-Yi Hu;Yong-Guan Zhu;Min Li;Li-Gan Zhang

  • The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae gives contradictory effects on phosphorus and arsenic acquisition by Medicago sativa Linn.

    Baodong Chen;Xueyi Xiao;Yong-Guan Zhu;F. Andrew Smith

  • Plant growth depressions in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: not just caused by carbon drain?

    Huiying Li;F. Andrew Smith;Sandy Dickson;Robert E. Holloway;Robert E. Holloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Yong-Guan Zhu
Yong-Guan Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Timothy R. Cavagnaro
Timothy R. Cavagnaro University of Adelaide
Iver Jakobsen
Iver Jakobsen University of Copenhagen
Mark Tester
Mark Tester King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Baodong Chen
Baodong Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Daniel P. Schachtman
Daniel P. Schachtman University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Alan Richardson
Alan Richardson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Hans Lambers
Hans Lambers University of Western Australia
Sally E. Smith
Sally E. Smith University of Adelaide
Jan Jansa
Jan Jansa Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing F. Andrew Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles