World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
6858
World Ranking
18485
National Ranking
1447

Mark Viney publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Viney sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark Viney D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Viney sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Member of the Royal Irish Academy

Overview

Mark Viney is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Immunology and Microbiology as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

Their work explores several subfields including Parasitology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Infectious Diseases, and Ecology. Main research topics addressed by Viney include Parasites and Host Interactions, Parasite Biology and Host Interactions, Helminth infection and control, Gut microbiota and health, T-cell and B-cell Immunology, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics and are published in various scientific venues. Notable papers include:

  • The ecology of viruses in urban rodents with a focus on SARS-CoV-2, 2023, Emerging Microbes & Infections
  • Toward genetic modification of plant-parasitic nematodes: delivery of macromolecules to adults and expression of exogenous mRNA in second stage juveniles, 2021, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
  • A One Health Approach to Child Stunting: Evidence and Research Agenda, 2021, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • The parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti exists predominantly as populations of long-lived asexual lineages, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Strongyloides questions-a research agenda for the future, 2023, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Viney has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, Emerging Microbes & Infections, and the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Collaborative research is a significant aspect of Viney's work, with frequent co-authors including Vicky L. Hunt, Yu-Chen Liu, Steve Paterson, Virak Khieu, and Taisei Kikuchi.

Mark Viney was recognized with the award of becoming a Member of the Royal Irish Academy in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Optimal immune responses: immunocompetence revisited

    Mark E. Viney;Eleanor M. Riley;Katherine L. Buchanan

  • Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the genus Strongyloides and related nematodes

    Mark Dorris;Mark E. Viney;Mark L. Blaxter

  • The comparative immunology of wild and laboratory mice, Mus musculus domesticus

    Stephen Abolins;Elizabeth C King;Luke Lazarou;Laura Weldon

  • The genomic basis of parasitism in the Strongyloides clade of nematodes

    Vicky L Hunt;Isheng J Tsai;Avril Coghlan;Adam J Reid

  • Why Does HIV Infection Not Lead to Disseminated Strongyloidiasis

    Mark E. Viney;Michael Brown;Michael Brown;Nicholas E. Omoding;J. Wendi Bailey

  • Hypoxia Tolerance in Animals: Biology and Application*

    T A Gorr;D Wichmann;J Hu;M Hermes-Lima

  • Breaking beta: deconstructing the parasite transmission function

    Hamish McCallum;Andy Fenton;Peter J. Hudson;Brian Lee

  • The biology of Strongyloides spp.

    Mark E Viney;James B Lok

  • Measures of immune function of wild mice, Mus musculus

    Stephen R. Abolins;Michael J. O. Pocock;Julius C. R. Hafalla;Eleanor M. Riley

  • HOST IMMUNE STATUS DETERMINES SEXUALITY IN A PARASITIC NEMATODE

    Alan W. Gemmill;Mark E. Viney;Andrew F. Read

  • Developmental switching in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti

    M. E. Viney

  • Host immune responses are necessary for density dependence in nematode infections.

    S Paterson;Mark Viney

  • The Gut Microbiota of Wild Mice

    Laura Weldon;Stephen Abolins;Luca Lenzi;Christian Bourne

  • The control of morph development in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti

    S. C. Harvey;A. W. Gemmill;A. F. Read;M. E. Viney

  • Detecting interspecific macroparasite interactions from ecological data: patterns and process

    Andy Fenton;Mark E. Viney;Jo Lello

  • Elucidating the spread of the emerging canid nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum between Palaearctic and Nearctic ecozones

    R. Jefferies;S.E. Shaw;J. Willesen;M.E. Viney

  • A genetic analysis of reproduction in Strongyloides ratti.

    Mark Viney

  • Patterns and processes in parasite co-infection.

    Mark E. Viney;Andrea Linn Graham

  • Quantitative genetic analysis of life-history traits of Caenorhabditis elegans in stressful environments

    Simon C Harvey;Alison Shorto;Mark E Viney

  • Comparison of the Distal Gut Microbiota from People and Animals in Africa

    Richard J. Ellis;Kenneth D. Bruce;Claire Jenkins;J. Russell Stothard

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Paterson
Steve Paterson University of Liverpool
Eleanor M. Riley
Eleanor M. Riley University of Edinburgh
Andrew F. Read
Andrew F. Read Pennsylvania State University
David Gems
David Gems University College London
John T. Jones
John T. Jones James Hutton Institute
Andy Fenton
Andy Fenton University of Liverpool
Matthew C. Fisher
Matthew C. Fisher Imperial College London
Richard C. Tinsley
Richard C. Tinsley University of Bristol
Thomas J. Baum
Thomas J. Baum Iowa State University
Eric R. Morgan
Eric R. Morgan Queen's University Belfast

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens up a variety of career opportunities in healthcare, research, and nutrition. For those interested in nursing or advanced patient care, there are flexible options such as shortest online pmhnp certificate programs, which help registered nurses quickly gain specialization in psychiatric mental health.

Students looking to advance their nursing credentials even further can consider finishing a 12-month fnp program online. These accelerated programs pave the way to advanced practice roles in family nurse practitioner careers.

If your interests lean toward dietetics and nutrition, a dietician degree online offers a cost-effective and flexible route to a rewarding field focused on health and wellness.

For those already working as registered nurses, the easiest rn to bsn online program allows fast-tracked advancement into leadership or specialized nursing positions. Each of these pathways complements a background in Biology or Biochemistry, helping you expand your skills and open new professional doors.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Viney

Trending Scientists