World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 78 479 442 43 36 322 17514

Ian C. Dodd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian C. Dodd between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian C. Dodd published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2021. 19 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2021. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 3 publications
1994 2026

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian C. Dodd: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 4
2005 5
2006 4
2007 8
2008 9
2009 16
2010 10
2011 13
2012 6
2013 19
2014 14
2015 23
2016 25
2017 14
2018 19
2019 8
2020 25
2021 29
2022 19
2023 27
2024 12
2025 16
2026 3
Total 348
Download as CSV

Ian C. Dodd publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian C. Dodd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–325 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 322 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14 322
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Ian C. Dodd D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian C. Dodd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25 78
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Agronomy
  • Horticulture

Ian C. Dodd focuses on Botany, Xylem, Agronomy, Shoot and Rhizosphere. His study in the field of Chlorophyll and Gibberellin is also linked to topics like Cytokinin, Plant hormone and MYB. His work in the fields of Zeatin overlaps with other areas such as Rootstock.

His Xylem study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Plant physiology, Soil water, Water content and Stomatal conductance. His Agronomy study deals with Ecophysiology intersecting with Biomass partitioning. He has included themes like Biomass, Soil biology, Photosynthesis and Plant nutrition in his Rhizosphere study.

His most cited work include:

  • Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling (276 citations)
  • Hormonal changes in relation to biomass partitioning and shoot growth impairment in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants (274 citations)
  • Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress (239 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Agronomy, Shoot, Xylem, Horticulture and Botany. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Soil water, Transpiration and Water content. While working on this project, Ian C. Dodd studies both Shoot and Cytokinin.

Within one scientific family, Ian C. Dodd focuses on topics pertaining to Stomatal conductance under Xylem, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Transpiration stream. His research in the fields of Pisum, Sativum and Cultivar overlaps with other disciplines such as Root hair. Botany is frequently linked to Rhizosphere in his study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (44.61%)
  • Shoot (37.25%)
  • Xylem (32.84%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Horticulture (28.92%)
  • Shoot (37.25%)
  • Agronomy (44.61%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ian C. Dodd mainly investigates Horticulture, Shoot, Agronomy, Stomatal conductance and Xylem. His work on Root system and Rootstock as part of general Horticulture study is frequently linked to Root hair, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Shoot study combines topics in areas such as Sativum, Pisum, Crop, Gibberellin and Drought tolerance.

His work investigates the relationship between Agronomy and topics such as Soil water that intersect with problems in Microbial population biology and Microorganism. His work carried out in the field of Stomatal conductance brings together such families of science as Irrigation, Water-use efficiency and Transpiration. The study incorporates disciplines such as Early season and Leaf water in addition to Xylem.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Phytohormone Mediation of Interactions Between Plants and Non-Symbiotic Growth Promoting Bacteria Under Edaphic Stresses (28 citations)
  • Stem girdling uncouples soybean stomatal conductance from leaf water potential by enhancing leaf xylem ABA concentration (10 citations)
  • Impact of overexpression of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase on growth and gene expression under salinity stress (7 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Horticulture
  • Agronomy

His primary areas of investigation include Shoot, Horticulture, Stomatal conductance, Xylem and Irrigation. His Shoot study is concerned with the field of Agronomy as a whole. His work focuses on many connections between Stomatal conductance and other disciplines, such as Crop, that overlap with his field of interest in Sugar.

Ian C. Dodd combines subjects such as Leaf water and Soil drying with his study of Xylem. His work in Solanum covers topics such as Rootstock which are related to areas like Water content. His Rhizosphere study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Botany.

Best Publications

  • Hormonal changes in relation to biomass partitioning and shoot growth impairment in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants

    Alfonso Albacete;Michel Edmond Ghanem;Cristina Martínez-Andújar;Manuel Acosta

  • Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress

    Ian C. Dodd;Francisco Pérez-Alfocea

  • Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling

    Andrey A. Belimov;Ian C. Dodd;Nikos Hontzeas;Julian C. Theobald

  • Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status

    I.C. Dodd;N.Y. Zinovkina;V.I. Safronova;A.A. Belimov

  • AtMYB61, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor controlling stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Yun Kuan Liang;Christian Dubos;Ian C. Dodd;Geoffrey H. Holroyd

  • Unravelling rootstock× scion interactions to improve food security

    Unknown

  • Root-To-Shoot Signalling: Assessing The Roles of ‘Up’ In the Up and Down World of Long-Distance Signalling In Planta

    Ian C. Dodd

  • Hormonal changes during salinity-induced leaf senescence in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

    Michel Edmond Ghanem;Alfonso Albacete;Cristina Martínez-Andújar;Manuel Acosta

  • Long-distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial root-zone drying

    Wagdy Y. Sobeih;Ian C. Dodd;Mark A. Bacon;Donald Grierson

  • Hormonal Interactions and Stomatal Responses

    Ian C. Dodd

  • Root-synthesized cytokinins improve shoot growth and fruit yield in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants

    Michel Edmond Ghanem;Alfonso Albacete;Ann C. Smigocki;Ivo Frébort

  • Phytohormone Mediation of Interactions Between Plants and Non-Symbiotic Growth Promoting Bacteria Under Edaphic Stresses

    Guzel Kudoyarova;Tatiana Arkhipova;Tatiana Korshunova;Margarita Bakaeva

  • Vertical farming increases lettuce yield per unit area compared to conventional horizontal hydroponics

    Dennis Touliatos;Ian Charles Dodd;Martin Robert McAinsh

  • Rootstock-mediated changes in xylem ionic and hormonal status are correlated with delayed leaf senescence, and increased leaf area and crop productivity in salinized tomato

    Alfonso Albacete;Cristina Martínez-Andújar;Michel Edmond Ghanem;Manuel Acosta

  • Physiological impacts of ABA–JA interactions under water-limitation

    Carlos de Ollas;Ian C. Dodd

  • Pseudomonas brassicacearum strain Am3 containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase can show both pathogenic and growth-promoting properties …

    Unknown

  • Rhizosphere manipulations to maximize ‘crop per drop’during deficit irrigation

    Unknown

  • Effect of partial rootzone drying on the concentration of zeatin-type cytokinins in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) xylem sap and leaves

    Guzel R. Kudoyarova;Lidia B. Vysotskaya;Alla Cherkozyanova;Ian C. Dodd

  • Auxin production by rhizobacteria was associated with improved yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress

    Asif Raheem;Alexander Shaposhnikov;Andrey A. Belimov;Ian C. Dodd

  • Abscisic acid metabolizing rhizobacteria decrease ABA concentrations in planta and alter plant growth.

    Andrey A. Belimov;Ian C. Dodd;Vera I. Safronova;Valentina A. Dumova

  • Biomass allocation in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants grown under partial rootzone drying: enhancement of root growth.

    Darren M. Mingo;Julian C. Theobald;Mark A. Bacon;William J. Davies

  • Cytokinin producing bacteria stimulate amino acid deposition by wheat roots.

    Guzel R. Kudoyarova;Alexander I. Melentiev;Elena V. Martynenko;Leila N. Timergalina

  • Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1- carboxylate deaminase increase growth and photosynthesis of pea plants under salt stress by limiting Na+ accumulation

    Qiyuan Wang;Ian C. Dodd;Andrey A. Belimov;Fan Jiang

  • Hormonal regulation of source-sink relations to maintain crop productivity under salinity: a case study of root-to-shoot signalling in tomato.

    Francisco Perez-Alfocea;Alfonso Albacete;Alfonso Albacete;Michel Edmond Ghanem;Ian C. Dodd

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfonso Albacete
Alfonso Albacete IMIDA - Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario
William J. Davies
William J. Davies Lancaster University
Francisco Pérez-Alfocea
Francisco Pérez-Alfocea Spanish National Research Council
Cristina Martínez-Andújar
Cristina Martínez-Andújar Spanish National Research Council
Stanley Lutts
Stanley Lutts Université Catholique de Louvain
William R. Whalley
William R. Whalley Rothamsted Research
Martin A. J. Parry
Martin A. J. Parry Lancaster University
John N. Quinton
John N. Quinton Lancaster University
Martin R. McAinsh
Martin R. McAinsh Lancaster University
Christine A. Beveridge
Christine A. Beveridge University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ian C. Dodd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles