World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
13000
World Ranking
6476
National Ranking
495

Clive W. Lloyd publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive W. Lloyd sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Clive W. Lloyd D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clive W. Lloyd sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clive W. Lloyd is affiliated with the John Innes Centre in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Medicine.

Their main subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. These subfields align with the diverse main topics present in their work, which cover Plant Reproductive Biology, Plant Molecular Biology Research, Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls, Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, as well as Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications.

Clive W. Lloyd has contributed to several scientific publications. Among recent papers are:

  • A rich and bountiful harvest: Key discoveries in plant cell biology (2021, The Plant Cell)
  • Isoindolinone-Based PET Tracers for Imaging Mutant Huntingtin Aggregates (2025, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)
  • Correction to "Isoindolinone-Based PET Tracers for Imaging Mutant Huntingtin Aggregates" (2025, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)

Their frequent co-authors include Longbin Liu, Peter Johnson, Matthew R. Mills, Penelope A. Turner, and Michael E. Prime. These collaborations appear across multiple publications, indicating recurring research partnerships.

Publication venues for their work frequently include the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and The Plant Cell, pointing to a strong presence in both biochemical and plant science communities.

Best Publications

  • The Cytoskeletal basis of plant growth and form

    Clive Lloyd

  • Rapid isolation of plasma membranes in high yield from cultured fibroblasts.

    D Thom;A J Powell;C W Lloyd;D A Rees

  • An actin network is present in the cytoplasm throughout the cell cycle of carrot cells and associates with the dividing nucleus.

    Jan A. Traas;John H. Doonan;David J. Rawlins;Peter J. Shaw

  • EB1 reveals mobile microtubule nucleation sites in Arabidopsis

    Jordi Chan;Grant M Calder;John H Doonan;Clive W Lloyd

  • The 65-kDa carrot microtubule-associated protein forms regularly arranged filamentous cross-bridges between microtubules

    Jordi Chan;Cynthia G. Jensen;Lawrence C. W. Jensen;Max Bush

  • Dynamic reorientation of cortical microtubules, from transverse to longitudinal, in living plant cells

    Ming Yuan;Peter J. Shaw;Richard M. Warn;Clive W. Lloyd

  • Ethylene-induced microtubule reorientations: mediation by helical arrays.

    I N Roberts;C W Lloyd;K Roberts

  • Microinjected profilin affects cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells by rapidly depolymerizing actin microfilaments

    Christopher J. Staiger;Ming Yuan;Rudolf Valenta;Peter J. Shaw

  • The Arabidopsis Microtubule-Associated Protein AtMAP65-1: Molecular Analysis of Its Microtubule Bundling Activity

    Andrei P. Smertenko;Hsin-Yu Chang;Vera Wagner;Despina Kaloriti

  • Control of grip and stick in cell adhesion through lateral relationships of membrane glycoproteins.

    David A. Rees;Clive W. Lloyd;David Thom

  • Microtubules and the shape of plants to come.

    Clive Lloyd;Jordi Chan

  • Cortical microtubule arrays undergo rotary movements in Arabidopsis hypocotyl epidermal cells.

    Jordi Chan;Grant Calder;Samantha Fox;Clive Lloyd

  • The plant cytoskeleton

    Christopher J. Staiger;Clive W. Lloyd

  • The profilin multigene family of maize: differential expression of three isoforms

    Christopher J. Staiger;Kim C. Goodbody;Patrick J. Hussey;Rudolf Valenta

  • Toward a dynamic helical model for the influence of microtubules on wall patterns in plants

    Clive W. Lloyd

  • A new class of microtubule-associated proteins in plants

    Andrei Smertenko;Norihan Saleh;Hisako Igarashi;Hisako Igarashi;Hitoshi Mori

  • Localization of the microtubule end binding protein EB1 reveals alternative pathways of spindle development in Arabidopsis suspension cells.

    Jordi Chan;Grant Calder;Samantha Fox;Clive Lloyd

  • Actin organization during the cell cycle in meristematic plant cells: Actin is present in the cytokinetic phragmoplast

    Lesley Clayton;Clive W. Lloyd

  • Inhibition of plant plasma membrane phosphoinositide phospholipase C by the actin‐binding protein, profilin

    Bjorn K. Drobak;Peter A.C. Watkins;Rudolf Valenta;Stephen K. Dove

  • Microtubules, protoplasts and plant cell shape

    Clive W. Lloyd;Antoni R. Slabas;Andrew J. Powell;Susan B. Lowe

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Doonan
John H. Doonan Aberystwyth University
Patrick J. Hussey
Patrick J. Hussey Durham University
Peter Shaw
Peter Shaw Norwich Research Park
Antoni R. Slabas
Antoni R. Slabas Durham University
Christopher J. Staiger
Christopher J. Staiger Purdue University West Lafayette
Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro
Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Rudolf Valenta
Rudolf Valenta Medical University of Vienna
Andrei Smertenko
Andrei Smertenko Washington State University
Jan Traas
Jan Traas École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Peter Nick
Peter Nick Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Clive W. Lloyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles