World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hossam M. Zawbaa

Hossam M. Zawbaa

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5014
World Ranking
12170
National Ranking
12

Hossam M. Zawbaa publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hossam M. Zawbaa sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 66 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hossam M. Zawbaa D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hossam M. Zawbaa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hossam M. Zawbaa is affiliated with Technological University Dublin in Ireland. Their research spans across engineering and computer science, with a particular focus on electrical and electronic engineering, control and systems engineering, and artificial intelligence.

The primary fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Engineering
  • Computer Science

The subfields of study include:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Economics and Econometrics

Key research topics covered in their work are:

  • Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Electric Power System Optimization
  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth

Hossam M. Zawbaa has contributed to numerous research publications. Frequent venues for their papers include:

  • Energy Reports
  • IEEE Access
  • Ain Shams Engineering Journal
  • Heliyon
  • Soft Computing

Recent research papers include:

  • The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence (2022, Energy Reports)
  • Residential Demand Side Management model, optimization and future perspective: A review (2022, Energy Reports)
  • Demand side management of electric vehicles in smart grids: A survey on strategies, challenges, modeling, and optimization (2022, Energy Reports)
  • An improved wild horse optimization algorithm for reliability based optimal DG planning of radial distribution networks (2021, Energy Reports)
  • Modeling and sensitivity analysis of grid-connected hybrid green microgrid system (2022, Ain Shams Engineering Journal)

The researcher has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Salah Kamel
  • Mohit Bajaj
  • Ali Wagdy Mohamed
  • Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo
  • Ephraim Bonah Agyekum

Best Publications

  • Binary grey wolf optimization approaches for feature selection

    E. Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Binary ant lion approaches for feature selection

    E. Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Feature Subset Selection Approach by Gray-Wolf Optimization

    Eid Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Crina Grosan;Abul Ella Hassenian

  • Experienced Gray Wolf Optimization Through Reinforcement Learning and Neural Networks

    E. Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Crina Grosan

  • Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization.

    Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hossam M. Zawbaa;E. Emary;E. Emary;Crina Grosan;Crina Grosan

  • Large-dimensionality small-instance set feature selection: a hybrid bio-inspired heuristic approach

    Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Eid Emary;Eid Emary;Crina Grosan;Crina Grosan;Václav Snášel

  • Sine cosine optimization algorithm for feature selection

    Ahmed Ibrahem Hafez;Hossam M. Zawbaa;E. Emary;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Feature selection approach based on whale optimization algorithm

    Marwa Sharawi;Hossam M. Zawbaa;E. Emary

  • ArSLAT: Arabic Sign Language Alphabets Translator

    Nashwa El-Bendary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Mahmoud S. Daoud;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Automatic fruit classification using random forest algorithm

    Hossam M. Zawbaa;Maryam Hazman;Mona Abbass;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Feature selection approach based on moth-flame optimization algorithm

    Hossam M. Zawbaa;E. Emary;B. Parv;Marwa Sharawi

  • Firefly Optimization Algorithm for Feature Selection

    E. Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Kareem Kamal A. Ghany;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Feature selection based on antlion optimization algorithm

    Hossam M. Zawbaa;E. Emary;B. Parv

  • Feature selection via Lèvy Antlion optimization

    Eid Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hossam M. Zawbaa

  • RoadMonitor: An Intelligent Road Surface Condition Monitoring System

    Adham Mohamed;Mohamed Mostafa M. Fouad;Esraa Elhariri;Nashwa El-Bendary;Nashwa El-Bendary

  • Impact of Chaos Functions on Modern Swarm Optimizers.

    E. Emary;E. Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hossam M. Zawbaa

  • Automatic Nile Tilapia fish classification approach using machine learning techniques

    Mohamed Mostafa M. Fouad;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Nashwa El-Bendary;Aboul Ella Hassanien

  • Impact of Lèvy flight on modern meta-heuristic optimizers

    Eid Emary;Eid Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Marwa Sharawi

  • An innovative approach for feature selection based on chicken swarm optimization

    Ahmed Ibrahem Hafez;Hossam M. Zawbaa;E. Emary;Hamdi A. Mahmoud

  • Retinal blood vessel segmentation using bee colony optimisation and pattern search

    Eid Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Aboul Ella Hassanien;Gerald Schaefer

  • Retinal blood vessel localization approach based on bee colony swarm optimization, fuzzy c-means and pattern search

    Aboul Ella Hassanien;E. Emary;Hossam M. Zawbaa

  • A robust cattle identification scheme using muzzle print images

    Ali Ismail Awad;Hossam M. Zawbaa;Hamdi A. Mahmoud;Eman Hany Hassan Abdel Nabi

Frequent Co-Authors

Aboul Ella Hassanien
Aboul Ella Hassanien Cairo University
Crina Grosan
Crina Grosan King's College London
Vaclav Snasel
Vaclav Snasel Technical University of Ostrava
Tai-hoon Kim
Tai-hoon Kim Beijing Jiaotong University
Gerald Schaefer
Gerald Schaefer Loughborough University
Ajith Abraham
Ajith Abraham Sai University
Alaa Tharwat
Alaa Tharwat Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences
Ching Y. Suen
Ching Y. Suen Concordia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring flexible learning options in Computer Science can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students start with 1 year associate degree programs online, which are ideal for quickly gaining foundational skills and entering the tech workforce.

When looking for advancement, consider pursuing the best masters degree to get in technology fields. These advanced degrees can lead to highly specialized roles and help boost earning potential.

Cost and academic requirements are important to consider. Fortunately, there are cheap online degrees fast that make quality education more accessible for students on a budget. Additionally, finding online colleges that accept low gpa can help those who may not have strong academic backgrounds but still want to pursue a rewarding career in tech.

With online degrees, you can create your own path in Computer Science—regardless of your starting point, budget, or previous academic performance.

Best Scientists Citing Hossam M. Zawbaa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles