World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
26761
World Ranking
9973
National Ranking
4367

David M. Hockenbery publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Hockenbery sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 160 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David M. Hockenbery D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Hockenbery sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Hockenbery is affiliated with the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, with significant contributions to several specialized subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, oncology, genetics, surgery, and cancer research.

The scientist's published work includes a focus on pancreatic function and diabetes, MRI in cancer diagnosis, medical imaging techniques and applications, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, and adipose tissue and metabolism.

Frequent co-authors of David M. Hockenbery include:

  • Fionnuala Morrish
  • Hélène Gingras
  • Joanna Noonan
  • Ian R. Sweet
  • Iok Teng Kuok

The venues in which they commonly publish are:

  • Clinical and Translational Science
  • Cancer Research
  • Genetics
  • Cancers
  • Breast Cancer Research

Notable papers by David M. Hockenbery include:

  • Spontaneous Tumor Regression in Tasmanian Devils Associated with RASL11A Activation, 2020, Genetics
  • Cysteine and Folate Metabolism Are Targetable Vulnerabilities of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, 2021, Cancers
  • Multimodal prediction of neoadjuvant treatment outcome by serial FDG PET and MRI in women with locally advanced breast cancer, 2023, Breast Cancer Research
  • Pharmacometabonomic association of cyclophosphamide 4-hydroxylation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, 2022, Clinical and Translational Science
  • Lipidomics of cyclophosphamide 4-hydroxylation in patients receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide, 2022, Clinical and Translational Science

Best Publications

  • Bcl-2 is an inner mitochondrial membrane protein that blocks programmed cell death

    David Hockenbery;Gabriel Nuñez;Curt Milliman;Robert D. Schreiber

  • Bcl-2 functions in an antioxidant pathway to prevent apoptosis

    David M. Hockenbery;Zoltan N. Oltvai;Xiao Ming Yin;Curt L. Milliman

  • BCL2 protein is topographically restricted in tissues characterized by apoptotic cell death.

    David M. Hockenbery;Mary Zutter;William Hickey;Moon Nahm

  • bcl-2 inhibits multiple forms of apoptosis but not negative selection in thymocytes.

    Charles L. Sentman;John R. Shutter;David Hockenbery;Osami Kanagawa

  • Deregulated Bcl-2 gene expression selectively prolongs survival of growth factor-deprived hemopoietic cell lines.

    Gabriel Nuñez;Lucille London;David Hockenbery;Martha Alexander

  • The adenovirus E1A proteins induce apoptosis, which is inhibited by the E1B 19-kDa and Bcl-2 proteins.

    Lakshmi Rao;Michael Debbas;Peter Sabbatini;David Hockenbery

  • HIF1α induced switch from bivalent to exclusively glycolytic metabolism during ESC‐to‐EpiSC/hESC transition

    Wenyu Zhou;Michael Choi;Daciana Margineantu;Lilyana Margaretha

  • Antimycin A mimics a cell-death-inducing Bcl-2 homology domain 3.

    Shie-Pon Tzung;Kristine M. Kim;Gorka Basañez;Chris D. Giedt

  • The metabolome regulates the epigenetic landscape during naive-to-primed human embryonic stem cell transition

    Henrik Sperber;Julie Mathieu;Yuliang Wang;Amy Ferreccio

  • Mitochondrial Proliferation and Paradoxical Membrane Depolarization during Terminal Differentiation and Apoptosis in a Human Colon Carcinoma Cell Line

    Mariangela Mancini;Benjamin O. Anderson;Elizabeth Caldwell;Monireh Sedghinasab

  • Constitutive Expression of Human Bcl-2 Modulates Nitrogen Mustard and Camptothecin Induced Apoptosis

    M I Walton;D Whysong;P M O'Connor;D Hockenbery

  • Mutant IDH1 regulates the tumor-associated immune system in gliomas

    Nduka M. Amankulor;Youngmi Kim;Sonali Arora;Julia Kargl;Julia Kargl

  • Induction of the Warburg effect by Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus is required for the maintenance of latently infected endothelial cells

    Tracie Delgado;Patrick A. Carroll;Almira S. Punjabi;Daciana Margineantu

  • Bcl-2 maintains B cell memory

    Gabriel Nuñez;David Hockenbery;Timothy J. McDonnell;Craig M. Sorensen

  • Activation of NF-κB by Palmitate in Endothelial Cells: A Key Role for NADPH Oxidase-Derived Superoxide in Response to TLR4 Activation

    Ezekiel Maloney;Ian R. Sweet;David M. Hockenbery;Matilda Pham

  • Reactive oxygen species in chick hair cells after gentamicin exposure in vitro

    Keiko Hirose;David M. Hockenbery;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Bcl-2 family proteins as regulators of oxidative stress.

    Nathan Susnow;Liyun Zeng;Daciana Margineantu;David M. Hockenbery;David M. Hockenbery

  • Identification of genes with abnormal expression changes in acute myeloid leukemia.

    Derek L. Stirewalt;Soheil Meshinchi;Soheil Meshinchi;Kenneth J. Kopecky;Wenhong Fan

  • c-Myc activates multiple metabolic networks to generate substrates for cell-cycle entry.

    Fionnuala M. Morrish;Nancy Isern;Martin Sadilek;Mark Jeffrey

  • Immunolocalization of the Bcl-2 Protein Within Hematopoietic Neoplasms

    Mary Zutter;David Hockenbery;Gary A. Silverman;Stanley J. Korsmeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

George B. McDonald
George B. McDonald University of Washington
Daniel Raftery
Daniel Raftery University of Washington
H. Joachim Deeg
H. Joachim Deeg Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Stanley J. Korsmeyer
Stanley J. Korsmeyer Harvard University
Howard M. Shulman
Howard M. Shulman University of Washington
Paul J. Martin
Paul J. Martin Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Ted Gooley
Ted Gooley Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Lara J. Gamble
Lara J. Gamble University of Washington
Patrick S. Stayton
Patrick S. Stayton University of Washington
Gabriel Núñez
Gabriel Núñez University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As demand grows for skilled professionals in Biology, Biochemistry, and related health sciences, online education provides flexible pathways to advance your career. Many students explore programs like the dietician degree online to enter the nutrition and dietetics field. This is a great option for those interested in applying biochemistry knowledge to health and wellness.

For those already holding a nursing degree, programs such as rn to bsn programs are popular. These online degrees help registered nurses gain advanced skills in less time, often with flexible schedules suited for working professionals.

Advanced practitioners can consider specialized certificates, including the fastest post master's pmhnp options for psychiatric mental health or the 12-month fnp program online for those seeking to become family nurse practitioners. These pathways can be completed in a year or less, opening doors to leadership and specialized roles within healthcare.

Whether your interest lies in clinical practice, research, or health education, these online programs offer efficient, affordable, and accredited options to meet today’s workforce needs.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Hockenbery

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles