World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark J. Webb

Mark J. Webb

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 50 4855 4649 368 357 106 17921

Mark J. Webb publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark J. Webb between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark J. Webb published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2024. 13 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2024. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 9 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 4 publications
1992 2026

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark J. Webb: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 10
2007 6
2008 8
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 9
2013 11
2014 5
2015 8
2016 7
2017 4
2018 8
2019 1
2020 9
2021 1
2022 3
2023 9
2024 14
2025 9
2026 4
Total 152
Download as CSV

Mark J. Webb publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 106
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark J. Webb D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263 50
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark J. Webb is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work encompasses detailed investigation of climate variability, meteorological phenomena, and atmospheric processes.

The scientist's research contributions focus on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and oceanography. Subfields of study include:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Geology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Mark J. Webb's research addresses a range of specific topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers across various journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence" (2020) in Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Testing a Physical Hypothesis for the Relationship Between Climate Sensitivity and Double-ITCZ Bias in Climate Models" (2020) in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Climate Models Underestimate Dynamic Cloud Feedbacks in the Tropics" (2023) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "What Are the Main Causes of Positive Subtropical Low Cloud Feedbacks in Climate Models?" (2023) in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Positive Low Cloud Feedback Primarily Caused by Increasing Longwave Radiation From the Sea Surface in Two Versions of a Climate Model" (2023) in Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent collaborators include the following co-authors:

  • Tomoo Ogura
  • Matthew D. Palmer
  • Timothy Andrews
  • Adrian Lock
  • F. Hugo Lambert

Mark J. Webb has been published repeatedly in several venues, reflecting a focus within climate and atmospheric research communities. These venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations

    James M. Murphy;David M. H. Sexton;David N. Barnett;Gareth S. Jones

  • How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes

    Sandrine Bony;Robert Colman;Vladimir M. Kattsov;Richard P. Allan

  • Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity

    Sandrine Bony;Bjorn Stevens;Dargan M W Frierson;Christian Jakob

  • Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb;Karl E. Taylor

  • Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide

    Richard A. Betts;Olivier Boucher;Matthew Collins;Peter M. Cox;Peter M. Cox

  • COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment

    Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo;M Webb;S Bony;H Chepfer

  • Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements

    M. H. Zhang;W. Y. Lin;S. A. Klein;S. A. Klein;J. T. Bacmeister

  • Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models

    M. Webb;C. Senior;S. Bony;J.-J. Morcrette

  • Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;Glen R. Harris;James M. Murphy

  • On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles

    Mark J. Webb;C. A. Senior;D. M.H. Sexton;W. J. Ingram

  • Efficacy of self-monitored blood pressure, with or without telemonitoring, for titration of antihypertensive medication (TASMINH4): an unmasked randomised controlled trial

    Richard J McManus;Jonathan Mant;Marloes Franssen;Alecia Nickless

  • A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles

    J.M Murphy;B.B.B Booth;M Collins;G.R Harris

  • The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb

  • Mechanisms for the land/sea warming contrast exhibited by simulations of climate change

    Manoj M. Joshi;Manoj M. Joshi;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb;David M. H. Sexton

  • Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing

    Jonathan Gregory;Mark Webb

  • Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;B. Bhaskaran;Glen R. Harris

  • Bromoperoxidase and iodoperoxidase enzymes and production of halogenated methanes in marine diatom cultures

    R. M. Moore;M. Webb;R. Tokarczyk;R. Wever

  • The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6.

    Mark J. Webb;Timothy Andrews;Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo;Sandrine Bony

  • Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5

    Mark D. Zelinka;Stephen A. Klein;Karl E. Taylor;Timothy Andrews

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony Université Paris Cité
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
Matthew D. Collins
Matthew D. Collins University of Reading
Mark A. Ringer
Mark A. Ringer Met Office
Christopher S. Bretherton
Christopher S. Bretherton University of Washington
Bjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens Max Planck Society
Steven C. Sherwood
Steven C. Sherwood University of New South Wales
William Ingram
William Ingram University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary skills. For instance, earning a degree in public administration can prepare you for leadership roles in environmental policy and management. Many professionals opt for the best online masters in public administration to quickly gain relevant expertise without pausing their careers.

Social factors play a critical role in environmental studies. Pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors offers valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts affecting environmental change. This knowledge is essential for crafting effective community-centered environmental solutions.

For educators aiming to integrate environmental sciences into their curriculum, advanced degrees like an EdD can be transformative. Options such as online edd programs no dissertation allow candidates to advance their qualifications with flexible requirements. Additionally, professionals with a Master of Education may consider an eds to edd bridge program to seamlessly continue their academic journey.

All these pathways complement Environmental Sciences, offering diverse skills and credentials that can lead to impactful careers in research, administration, advocacy, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles