World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark J. Webb

Mark J. Webb

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
17921
World Ranking
4853
National Ranking
368

Mark J. Webb publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark J. Webb D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Webb sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark J. Webb is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work encompasses detailed investigation of climate variability, meteorological phenomena, and atmospheric processes.

The scientist's research contributions focus on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and oceanography. Subfields of study include:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography
  • Geology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Mark J. Webb's research addresses a range of specific topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers across various journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence" (2020) in Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Testing a Physical Hypothesis for the Relationship Between Climate Sensitivity and Double-ITCZ Bias in Climate Models" (2020) in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Climate Models Underestimate Dynamic Cloud Feedbacks in the Tropics" (2023) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "What Are the Main Causes of Positive Subtropical Low Cloud Feedbacks in Climate Models?" (2023) in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Positive Low Cloud Feedback Primarily Caused by Increasing Longwave Radiation From the Sea Surface in Two Versions of a Climate Model" (2023) in Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent collaborators include the following co-authors:

  • Tomoo Ogura
  • Matthew D. Palmer
  • Timothy Andrews
  • Adrian Lock
  • F. Hugo Lambert

Mark J. Webb has been published repeatedly in several venues, reflecting a focus within climate and atmospheric research communities. These venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations

    James M. Murphy;David M. H. Sexton;David N. Barnett;Gareth S. Jones

  • How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes

    Sandrine Bony;Robert Colman;Vladimir M. Kattsov;Richard P. Allan

  • An assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence

    S C Sherwood;M J Webb;J D Annan;K C Armour

  • Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity

    Sandrine Bony;Bjorn Stevens;Dargan M W Frierson;Christian Jakob

  • Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb;Karl E. Taylor

  • Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide

    Richard A. Betts;Olivier Boucher;Matthew Collins;Peter M. Cox;Peter M. Cox

  • COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment

    Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo;M Webb;S Bony;H Chepfer

  • Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements

    M. H. Zhang;W. Y. Lin;S. A. Klein;S. A. Klein;J. T. Bacmeister

  • Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models

    M. Webb;C. Senior;S. Bony;J.-J. Morcrette

  • Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;Glen R. Harris;James M. Murphy

  • On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles

    Mark J. Webb;C. A. Senior;D. M.H. Sexton;W. J. Ingram

  • Efficacy of self-monitored blood pressure, with or without telemonitoring, for titration of antihypertensive medication (TASMINH4): an unmasked randomised controlled trial

    Richard J McManus;Jonathan Mant;Marloes Franssen;Alecia Nickless

  • A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles

    J.M Murphy;B.B.B Booth;M Collins;G.R Harris

  • The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models

    Timothy Andrews;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb

  • Mechanisms for the land/sea warming contrast exhibited by simulations of climate change

    Manoj M. Joshi;Manoj M. Joshi;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Mark J. Webb;David M. H. Sexton

  • Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing

    Jonathan Gregory;Mark Webb

  • Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles

    Matthew Collins;Ben B. B. Booth;B. Bhaskaran;Glen R. Harris

  • Bromoperoxidase and iodoperoxidase enzymes and production of halogenated methanes in marine diatom cultures

    R. M. Moore;M. Webb;R. Tokarczyk;R. Wever

  • The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6.

    Mark J. Webb;Timothy Andrews;Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo;Sandrine Bony

  • Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5

    Mark D. Zelinka;Stephen A. Klein;Karl E. Taylor;Timothy Andrews

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandrine Bony
Sandrine Bony Université Paris Cité
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
Matthew D. Collins
Matthew D. Collins University of Reading
Mark A. Ringer
Mark A. Ringer Met Office
Christopher S. Bretherton
Christopher S. Bretherton University of Washington
Bjorn Stevens
Bjorn Stevens Max Planck Society
Steven C. Sherwood
Steven C. Sherwood University of New South Wales
William Ingram
William Ingram University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary skills. For instance, earning a degree in public administration can prepare you for leadership roles in environmental policy and management. Many professionals opt for the best online masters in public administration to quickly gain relevant expertise without pausing their careers.

Social factors play a critical role in environmental studies. Pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors offers valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts affecting environmental change. This knowledge is essential for crafting effective community-centered environmental solutions.

For educators aiming to integrate environmental sciences into their curriculum, advanced degrees like an EdD can be transformative. Options such as online edd programs no dissertation allow candidates to advance their qualifications with flexible requirements. Additionally, professionals with a Master of Education may consider an eds to edd bridge program to seamlessly continue their academic journey.

All these pathways complement Environmental Sciences, offering diverse skills and credentials that can lead to impactful careers in research, administration, advocacy, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles