World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark A. Ringer

Mark A. Ringer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
5875
World Ranking
9267
National Ranking
686

Mark A. Ringer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Ringer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 66 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark A. Ringer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Ringer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Ringer is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with notable contributions in the subfields of global and planetary change, atmospheric science, oceanography, astronomy and astrophysics, and environmental chemistry.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to climate variability and models, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, geology and paleoclimatology research, and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark A. Ringer include the following:

  • Historical Simulations With HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6, 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Aerosol-Forced AMOC Changes in CMIP6 Historical Simulations, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Sea-ice-free Arctic during the Last Interglacial supports fast future loss, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Projecting Global Mean Sea-Level Change Using CMIP6 Models, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Energy Budget Constraints on the Time History of Aerosol Forcing and Climate Sensitivity, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Mark A. Ringer frequently publishes in several scientific venues, including:

  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers, with the most frequent co-authors being:

  • Jeff Ridley
  • Timothy Andrews
  • Ed Blockley
  • Rowan Sutton
  • Matthew D. Palmer

Best Publications

  • On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles

    Mark J. Webb;C. A. Senior;D. M.H. Sexton;W. J. Ingram

  • Evaluation of cloud and water vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA “A-Train” satellite observations

    Jonathan H. Jiang;Hui Su;Chengxing Zhai;Vincent S. Perun

  • Global and European climate impacts of a slowdown of the AMOC in a high resolution GCM

    L. C. Jackson;R. Kahana;T. Graham;M. A. Ringer

  • The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model Description and Global Climatology

    G. M. Martin;M. A. Ringer;V. D. Pope;A. Jones

  • Origins of the Solar Radiation Biases over the Southern Ocean in CFMIP2 Models

    A. Bodas-Salcedo;K. D. Williams;M. A. Ringer;I. Beau

  • The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget Project

    J. E. Harries;J. E. Russell;J. A. Hanafin;H. Brindley

  • Historical simulations with HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6

    Martin B. Andrews;Jeff K. Ridley;Richard A. Wood;Timothy Andrews

  • Importance of the mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: a multi-model study

    Yoko Tsushima;S. Emori;S. Emori;T. Ogura;M. Kimoto

  • Reversibility in an Earth System model in response to CO 2 concentration changes

    O Boucher;P R Halloran;E J Burke;M Doutriaux-Boucher

  • Aerosol-Forced AMOC Changes in CMIP6 Historical Simulations

    Matthew B. Menary;Jon Robson;Richard Allan;Ben B. B. Booth

  • Estimating the uncertainty of using GPS radio occultation data for climate monitoring: Intercomparison of CHAMP refractivity climate records from 2002 to 2006 from different data centers

    Shu-peng Ho;Gottfried Kirchengast;Stephen Leroy;Jens Wickert

  • Strong Dependence of Atmospheric Feedbacks on Mixed-Phase Microphysics and Aerosol-Cloud Interactions in HadGEM3.

    A. Bodas-Salcedo;J. P. Mulcahy;T. Andrews;K. D. Williams

  • Evaluating cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using simulated CloudSat radar reflectivities

    A. Bodas-Salcedo;M. J. Webb;M. E. Brooks;M. A. Ringer

  • Forcings, Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity in HadGEM3-GC3.1 and UKESM1

    Timothy Andrews;Martin B. Andrews;Alejandro Bodas‐Salcedo;Gareth S. Jones

  • Sea-ice-free Arctic during the Last Interglacial supports fast future loss

    Maria-Vittoria Guarino;Louise C. Sime;David Schröeder;Irene Malmierca-Vallet

  • The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part II: Aspects of Variability and Regional Climate

    M. A. Ringer;G. M. Martin;C. Z. Greeves;T. J. Hinton

  • Projecting Global Mean Sea-Level Change Using CMIP6 Models

    Tim H. J. Hermans;Tim H. J. Hermans;Jonathan M. Gregory;Jonathan M. Gregory;Matthew D. Palmer;Mark A. Ringer

  • Global‐mean radiative feedbacks and forcing in atmosphere‐only and coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate change experiments

    Mark A. Ringer;Timothy Andrews;Mark J. Webb

  • Simulation of the Earth's radiation budget by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts 40-year reanalysis (ERA40)

    Richard P. Allan;Mark A. Ringer;J. Alison Pamment;Anthony Slingo

  • Diagnosis of regime‐dependent cloud simulation errors in CMIP5 models using “A‐Train” satellite observations and reanalysis data

    Hui Su;Jonathan H. Jiang;Chengxing Zhai;Vince S. Perun

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Allan
Richard P. Allan University of Reading
Mark J. Webb
Mark J. Webb Met Office
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading
A. Slingo
A. Slingo University of Reading
Matthew D. Palmer
Matthew D. Palmer University of Bristol
William Ingram
William Ingram University of Oxford
Seita Emori
Seita Emori University of Tokyo
Brian J. Soden
Brian J. Soden University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is a multidisciplinary field, and pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. For those interested in earth processes and natural resources, exploring online geology programs offers specialized knowledge in geoscience that supports environmental assessment and conservation efforts.

Geospatial technologies play a crucial role in managing environmental data. Students can strengthen their technical skills by enrolling in gis degree programs, which focus on spatial analysis and mapping—key tools for environmental monitoring and planning.

Environmental policy and administration require strong leadership and organizational skills. A best online masters in public administration can prepare graduates to design and implement effective environmental policies at local, state, or federal levels.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is essential for sustainable solutions. Students interested in these aspects may consider pursuing an online bachelors in sociology to gain insight into social dynamics that influence environmental outcomes.

By exploring these related online degrees, students can build complementary skill sets to advance their careers in environmental sciences and contribute meaningfully to the field.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Ringer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles