World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
67
Citations
17579
World Ranking
1963
National Ranking
56

Roel P.F. Schins publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roel P.F. Schins sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Roel P.F. Schins D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roel P.F. Schins sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC

    Paul J A Borm;David Robbins;Stephan Haubold;Thomas Kuhlbusch

  • Inhaled particles and lung cancer. Part A: Mechanisms.

    Ad M. Knaapen;Paul J.A. Borm;Catrin Albrecht;Roel P.F. Schins

  • Cellular responses to nanoparticles: Target structures and mechanisms

    Klaus Unfried;Catrin Albrecht;Lars-Oliver Klotz;Anna Von Mikecz

  • Calcium and ROS-mediated activation of transcription factors and TNF-α cytokine gene expression in macrophages exposed to ultrafine particles

    David M Brown;Ken Donaldson;Paul J Borm;Roel P F Schins

  • Oxidative stress and calcium signaling in the adverse effects of environmental particles (PM10).

    Ken Donaldson;Vicki Stone;Paul J.A. Borm;Luis A. Jimenez

  • Development of in vitro systems for nanotoxicology : methodological considerations

    Vicki Stone;Helinor Johnston;Roel P. F. Schins

  • Inflammatory effects of coarse and fine particulate matter in relation to chemical and biological constituents

    Roel P.F Schins;Janet H Lightbody;Paul J.A Borm;Tingming Shi

  • Nanomaterials Versus Ambient Ultrafine Particles: An Opportunity to Exchange Toxicology Knowledge

    Vicki Stone;Mark R Miller;Martin J D Clift;Alison Elder

  • Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Induce Oxidative Stress and DNA-Adduct Formation but not DNA-Breakage In Human Lung Cells

    Kunal Bhattacharya;Maria Davoren;Jens Boertz;Roel P.F. Schins

  • Metal-rich ambient particles (particulate Matter2.5) cause airway inflammation in healthy subjects

    Frank Schaumann;Paul J. A. Borm;Andreas Herbrich;Johannes Knoch

  • Neurodegenerative and neurological disorders by small inhaled particles.

    Harm J. Heusinkveld;Tina Wahle;Arezoo Campbell;Remco H. S. Westerink

  • Genotoxicity of Poorly Soluble Particles

    Roel P. F. Schins;Ad M. Knaapen

  • Cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage by nanoparticles in human intestinal Caco-2 cells

    Kirsten Gerloff;Catrin Albrecht;Agnes W. Boots;Irmgard Förster

  • Mechanisms of genotoxicity of particles and fibers.

    Roel P. F. Schins

  • Inhaled particles and lung cancer, part B: paradigms and risk assessment.

    Paul J.A. Borm;Roel P.F. Schins;Catrin Albrecht

  • Soluble metals as well as the insoluble particle fraction are involved in cellular DNA damage induced by particulate matter.

    Ad M. Knaapen;Tingming Shi;Paul J.A. Borm;Roel P.F. Schins

  • Hydroxyl radical generation by electron paramagnetic resonance as a new method to monitor ambient particulate matter composition

    Tingming Shi;Roel P. F. Schins;Ad M. Knaapen;Thomas Kuhlbusch

  • The quercetin paradox.

    Agnes W. Boots;Hui Li;Roel P.F. Schins;Rodger Duffin

  • Mechanisms and mediators in coal dust induced toxicity: a review.

    Roel P.F. Schins;Paul J. A. Borm

  • Oxidant generation by particulate matter: from biologically effective dose to a promising, novel metric

    Paul J A Borm;Frank Kelly;Nino Künzli;Roel P F Schins

Frequent Co-Authors

Flemming R. Cassee
Flemming R. Cassee Utrecht University
Ken Donaldson
Ken Donaldson University of Edinburgh
Aalt Bast
Aalt Bast Maastricht University
Frederik J. van Schooten
Frederik J. van Schooten Maastricht University
Irmgard Förster
Irmgard Förster University of Bonn
Roger W. L. Godschalk
Roger W. L. Godschalk Maastricht University
Michael Borte
Michael Borte Leipzig University
Bice Fubini
Bice Fubini University of Turin
Joachim Heinrich
Joachim Heinrich Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser
Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser University of Fribourg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. For educators and professionals aiming to enhance their expertise, programs like edd without dissertation offer flexible paths to doctorate degrees without the traditional dissertation, making advanced study more accessible.

Transitioning from a master’s in education to a doctoral degree? The best eds to edd programs provide streamlined online options tailored for education professionals wanting to integrate leadership skills with scientific knowledge.

For those passionate about social justice and community well-being—key elements in environmental advocacy—exploring dsw programs can equip professionals with advanced skills to tackle societal and environmental challenges through social work.

Additionally, if you’re seeking a broad foundation before specializing, affordable options like a low cost online general studies degree provide flexible pathways to build interdisciplinary knowledge essential for careers in environmental policy, research, or management.

Best Scientists Citing Roel P.F. Schins

Recently Published Articles