World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 41 5413 5006 267 243 157 9634

Erik Eberhardt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erik Eberhardt between 1997 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erik Eberhardt published across 25 years, from 1997 to 2021, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2007. 7 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2007. 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications
1997 2021

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erik Eberhardt: publications per year, 1997 to 2021
Year Publications
1997 4
1998 3
1999 5
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 6
2004 8
2005 4
2006 10
2007 26
2008 7
2009 21
2010 5
2011 2
2012 6
2013 8
2014 8
2015 10
2016 7
2017 6
2018 10
2019 3
2020 3
2021 4
Total 172
Download as CSV

Erik Eberhardt publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Eberhardt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 157 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495 157
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Erik Eberhardt D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik Eberhardt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289 41
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Erik Eberhardt is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Engineering, with particular attention to subfields such as Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, and Control and Systems Engineering.

The scientist's contributions cover a range of topics related to mineral and geotechnical engineering. Key topics in their research include:

  • Mineral Processing and Grinding
  • Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
  • Mining Techniques and Economics

Erik Eberhardt has contributed to the academic literature with publications primarily appearing in Mining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy. One recent paper authored is titled "Procedure for estimating broken ore density distribution within a draw column during block caving", published in 2021.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Leonardo Dorador and Davide Elmo, indicating a network of coauthors engaged in related mining and engineering research areas.

The scientist's work is aligned with mining and geomechanics disciplines, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach that integrates material mechanics and system engineering with applied mining techniques. This integration supports investigations related to mineral processing optimization and rock mass behavior within mining contexts.

Best Publications

  • Identifying crack initiation and propagation thresholds in brittle rock

    E Eberhardt;D Stead;B Stimpson;R S Read

  • Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunnelling and the influence of near-face stress rotation

    M.S Diederichs;P.K Kaiser;E Eberhardt

  • Numerical analysis of initiation and progressive failure in natural rock slopes—the 1991 Randa rockslide

    E. Eberhardt;D. Stead;J.S. Coggan

  • Quantifying progressive pre-peak brittle fracture damage in rock during uniaxial compression

    E Eberhardt;D Stead;B Stimpson

  • Developments in the characterization of complex rock slope deformation and failure using numerical modelling techniques

    D. Stead;E. Eberhardt;J.S. Coggan

  • Effects of Grain Size on the Initiation and Propagation Thresholds of Stress-induced Brittle Fractures

    E. Eberhardt;B. Stimpson;D. Stead

  • The Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion

    Erik Eberhardt

  • Numerical modelling of three-dimension stress rotation ahead of an advancing tunnel face

    E Eberhardt

  • Landslide risk management

    Oldrich Hungr;Robin Fell;Rejean Couture;Erik Eberhardt

  • Development of an early-warning time-of-failure analysis methodology for open-pit mine slopes utilizing ground-based slope stability radar monitoring data

    Graham J. Dick;Erik Eberhardt;Albert G. Cabrejo-Liévano;Doug Stead

  • Brittle rock fracture and progressive damage in uniaxial compression

    Erik Brian Eberhardt

  • Kinematic behaviour and velocity characteristics of a complex deep-seated crystalline rockslide system in relation to its interaction with a dam reservoir

    C. Zangerl;E. Eberhardt;S. Perzlmaier

  • On the seismic response of deep-seated rock slope instabilities — Insights from numerical modeling

    Valentin S. Gischig;Valentin S. Gischig;Erik Eberhardt;Jeffrey R. Moore;Oldrich Hungr

  • Numerical Investigation of Seismically Induced Rock Mass Fatigue as a Mechanism Contributing to the Progressive Failure of Deep-Seated Landslides

    Valentin Gischig;Giona Preisig;Erik Eberhardt

  • Long-term investigation of a deep-seated creeping landslide in crystalline rock. Part I. Geological and hydromechanical factors controlling the Campo Vallemaggia landslide

    L. BonzanigoL. Bonzanigo;E. EberhardtE. Eberhardt;S. LoewS. Loew

  • CHANGES IN ACOUSTIC EVENT PROPERTIES WITH PROGRESSIVE FRACTURE DAMAGE

    E. Eberhardt;D. Stead;B. Stimpson;R.S. Read

  • Normal stiffness of fractures in granitic rock: A compilation of laboratory and in-situ experiments

    C. Zangerl;K.F. Evans;E. Eberhardt;E. Eberhardt;S. Loew

  • Slope instability mechanisms in dipping interbedded conglomerates and weathered marls¿the 1999 Rufi landslide, Switzerland

    E. Eberhardt;K. Thuro;M. Luginbuehl

  • Developments in the analysis of footwall slopes in surface coal mining

    Douglas Stead;Erik Eberhardt

  • Discrete Fracture Network approach to characterise rock mass fragmentation and implications for geomechanical upscaling

    D. Elmo;S. Rogers;D. Stead;E. Eberhardt

  • The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006, Resat Ulusay, John A. Hudson (Eds.). Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics. 628pp., €25 (ISRM members), €30 (non-members), ISBN: 978-975-93675-4-1.

    Erik Eberhardt

Frequent Co-Authors

Doug Stead
Doug Stead Simon Fraser University
Simon Loew
Simon Loew ETH Zurich
Peter K. Kaiser
Peter K. Kaiser Laurentian University
Oldrich Hungr
Oldrich Hungr University of British Columbia
Reginald L. Hermanns
Reginald L. Hermanns Geological Survey of Norway
Keith F. Evans
Keith F. Evans ETH Zurich
Mark S. Diederichs
Mark S. Diederichs Queen's University
John J. Clague
John J. Clague Simon Fraser University
Alan G. Green
Alan G. Green ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary fields that complement its study. For those considering further education, accredited programs offer valuable credentials. For example, if you're interested in managing scientific data or archives, the mlis ala accredited programs provide specialized training in library and information science, essential for careers in research and academic libraries.

Many wonder, is a library science degree worth it? For Earth Science graduates, this degree can diversify skills and enhance employment prospects in curating scientific collections or digital repositories.

Visual documentation plays a vital role in Earth Science careers. Acquiring creative skills through a cheapest online photography degree can be an affordable way to develop expertise in capturing geological and environmental phenomena.

Veterans interested in these pathways might find specialized support through veteran friendly online photography degree programs, which accommodate diverse learning needs while advancing a practical skillset relevant to Earth Science fields.

Best Scientists Citing Erik Eberhardt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles