World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark S. Diederichs

Mark S. Diederichs

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
11776
World Ranking
5350
National Ranking
215

Mark S. Diederichs publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Diederichs sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 208 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark S. Diederichs D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Diederichs sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark S. Diederichs is affiliated with Queen's University in Canada and specializes in engineering, with a significant focus on mechanics of materials and civil and structural engineering. Their research spans multiple interconnected areas, notably rock mechanics and modeling, landslides and related hazards, geophysical methods and applications, tunneling and rock mechanics, and geotechnical engineering and analysis.

Their work includes investigations into geotechnical engineering and underground structures as well as advanced fiber optic sensors. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in their numerous publications across several specific topics:

  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Geophysical Methods and Applications
  • Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

Recent publications demonstrate expertise in both experimental and modeling approaches in geotechnical and rock mechanics fields. Some of the notable papers include:

  • "An in situ monitoring campaign of a hard rock pillar at great depth within a Canadian mine," 2020, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • "Estimating the long-term strength and time-to-failure of brittle rocks from laboratory testing," 2021, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
  • "Calibration of coupled hydro-mechanical properties of grain-based model for simulating fracture process and associated pore pressure evolution in excavation damage zone around deep tunnels," 2020, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • "Augmenting the in-situ rock bolt pull test with distributed optical fiber strain sensing," 2020, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
  • "Measuring the Full-Field Strain Response of Uniaxial Compression Test Specimens Using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing," 2021, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Timothy R. M. Packulak
  • Jennifer J. Day
  • Nicholas Vlachopoulos
  • Jonathan D. Aubertin
  • D. Jean Hutchinson

Diederichs' research findings have been published repeatedly in the following venues:

  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
  • Canadian Geotechnical Journal
  • Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

The cumulative volume of research contributions demonstrates a well-rounded focus on the mechanics of materials and geotechnical engineering challenges encountered in mining, tunneling, and underground structure stability. Their work also incorporates advanced sensing technologies, such as distributed fiber optic sensing, which aligns with recent trends in structural health monitoring and rock mechanics research.

Best Publications

  • Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus

    E. Hoek;M.S. Diederichs

  • Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunnelling and the influence of near-face stress rotation

    M.S Diederichs;P.K Kaiser;E Eberhardt

  • The 2003 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Mechanistic interpretation and practical application of damage and spalling prediction criteria for deep tunnelling

    Mark S. DiederichsM.S. Diederichs

  • A Review of the Tensile Strength of Rock: Concepts and Testing

    Matthew A. Perras;Mark S. Diederichs

  • Improved Longitudinal Displacement Profiles for Convergence Confinement Analysis of Deep Tunnels

    N. Vlachopoulos;M. S. Diederichs

  • Manuel Rocha Medal Recipient Rock Fracture and Collapse Under Low Confinement Conditions

    M. S. Diederichs

  • Cablebolting in underground mines

    D J Hutchinson;M S Diederichs

  • 3D random Voronoi grain-based models for simulation of brittle rock damage and fabric-guided micro-fracturing

    E. Ghazvinian;M.S. Diederichs;R. Quey

  • Instability of hard rockmasses, the role of tensile damage and relaxation

    Mark Stephen Diederichs

  • Geotechnical and operational applications for 3-dimensional laser scanning in drill and blast tunnels

    Stephanie Fekete;Mark Diederichs;Matthew Lato

  • Stability of large excavations in laminated hard rock masses: the voussoir analogue revisited

    M.S. Diederichs;P.K. Kaiser

  • Tensile strength and abutment relaxation as failure control mechanisms in underground excavations

    M.S. Diederichs;P.K. Kaiser

  • Optimization of LiDAR scanning and processing for automated structural evaluation of discontinuities in rockmasses

    Matt Lato;Mark S. Diederichs;D. Jean Hutchinson;Rob Harrap

  • Mechanical analysis of circular liners with particular reference to composite supports. For example, liners consisting of shotcrete and steel sets

    C. Carranza-Torres;M. Diederichs

  • Predicting excavation damage zone depths in brittle rocks

    Matthew A. Perras;Matthew A. Perras;Mark S. Diederichs

  • Analysis of time-dependent deformation in tunnels using the Convergence-Confinement Method

    Chrysothemis Paraskevopoulou;Mark Diederichs

  • Automated rockmass discontinuity mapping from 3-dimensional surface data

    Malte Vöge;Matthew J. Lato;Matthew J. Lato;Matthew J. Lato;Mark S. Diederichs

  • Bias Correction for View-limited Lidar Scanning of Rock Outcrops for Structural Characterization

    Matthew J. Lato;Mark S. Diederichs;D. Jean Hutchinson

  • Appropriate Uses and Practical Limitations of 2D Numerical Analysis of Tunnels and Tunnel Support Response

    Nicholas Vlachopoulos;Mark S. Diederichs

  • Integration of three-dimensional laser scanning with discontinuum modelling for stability analysis of tunnels in blocky rockmasses

    Stephanie Fekete;Mark Diederichs

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Kaiser
Peter K. Kaiser Laurentian University
Simon Loew
Simon Loew ETH Zurich
Florian Amann
Florian Amann RWTH Aachen University
Leandro R. Alejano
Leandro R. Alejano Universidade de Vigo
Erik Eberhardt
Erik Eberhardt University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, but many students also explore related fields through online education. For those interested in management roles within environmental organizations, pursuing a human resource management masters degree online can provide valuable leadership skills.

Online learning options have expanded to accommodate a wide range of learners, including older adults looking to advance or change careers. Programs featured under online degree programs for seniors highlight flexibility and accessibility, which are important considerations for non-traditional students pursuing Earth Science or related degrees.

For those interested in the intersection of Earth Science and information management, researching ala accredited schools offers opportunities in Library and Information Science, ensuring programs meet high professional standards.

Considering whether a degree is a good fit, resources on is library science a good degree provide insight into career prospects, transferable skills, and how such programs complement scientific fields like Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Diederichs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles