World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eva M. Müller-Oehring

Eva M. Müller-Oehring

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
3902
World Ranking
9541
National Ranking
4029

Eva M. Müller-Oehring publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva M. Müller-Oehring sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eva M. Müller-Oehring D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eva M. Müller-Oehring sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eva M. Müller-Oehring is affiliated with SRI International in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting domains, focusing primarily on medicine, psychology, and neuroscience. The scientist has contributed significantly to subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and virology.

Their main topics of study include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Müller-Oehring's research output includes recent publications addressing adolescent mental health, alcohol use, neurodevelopment, and functional connectivity disruptions. Selected papers include:

  • "The Pandemic's Toll on Young Adolescents: Prevention and Intervention Targets to Preserve Their Mental Health," 2022, Journal of Adolescent Health
  • "Adolescent alcohol use disrupts functional neurodevelopment in sensation seeking girls," 2020, Addiction Biology
  • "Growth trajectories of cognitive and motor control in adolescence: How much is development and how much is practice?", 2021, Neuropsychology
  • "Quantitative Digitography Measures Fine Motor Disturbances in Chronically Treated HIV Similar to Parkinson's Disease," 2020, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • "Disruption of cerebellar-cortical functional connectivity predicts balance instability in alcohol use disorder," 2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Common publication venues for Müller-Oehring's work include:

  • SLEEP
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Neuropsychology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Fiona C. Baker
  • Orsolya Kiss
  • Tilman Schulte
  • Kilian M. Pohl
  • Susan F. Tapert

Best Publications

  • Corpus Callosal Microstructural Integrity Influences Interhemispheric Processing: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

    T. Schulte;E.V. Sullivan;E.M. Müller-Oehring;E. Adalsteinsson

  • Contribution of Callosal Connections to the Interhemispheric Integration of Visuomotor and Cognitive Processes

    Tilman Schulte;Eva M. Müller-Oehring

  • The Resting Brain of Alcoholics

    Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Young-Chul Jung;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan

  • Establishing a framework for neuropathological correlates and glymphatic system functioning in Parkinson's disease.

    Saranya Sundaram;Saranya Sundaram;Rachel L. Hughes;Eric Peterson;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Eva M. Müller-Oehring

  • Cerebral Blood Flow in Posterior Cortical Nodes of the Default Mode Network Decreases with Task Engagement but Remains Higher than in Most Brain Regions

    Adolf Pfefferbaum;Sandra Chanraud;Sandra Chanraud;Anne-Lise Pitel;Eva Müller-Oehring;Eva Müller-Oehring

  • Restoration of vision II: Residual functions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain-damaged patients

    Erich Kasten;Dorothe A. Poggel;Eva Müller-Oehring;Janna Gothe

  • A selective insular perfusion deficit contributes to compromised salience network connectivity in recovering alcoholic men.

    Edith V. Sullivan;Eva Müller-Oehring;Eva Müller-Oehring;Anne-Lise Pitel;Sandra Chanraud;Sandra Chanraud

  • Remapping the Brain to Compensate for Impairment in Recovering Alcoholics

    Sandra Chanraud;Anne-Lise Pitel;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Stability of Visual Field Enlargements Following Computer-Based Restitution Training Results of a Follow-up

    Erich Kasten;Eva Müller-Oehring;Bernhard A. Sabel

  • Local–global interference is modulated by age, sex and anterior corpus callosum size

    Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Tilman Schulte;Carla Raassi;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Acute effects of alcohol on divided and covert attention in men.

    Tilman Schulte;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Hans Strasburger;Heinz Warzel

  • Synchrony of Corticostriatal-Midbrain Activation Enables Normal Inhibitory Control and Conflict Processing in Recovering Alcoholic Men

    Tilman Schulte;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Edith V. Sullivan;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Visual search and the aging brain: discerning the effects of age-related brain volume shrinkage on alertness, feature binding, and attentional control.

    Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Tilman Schulte;Torsten Rohlfing;Adolf Pfefferbaum

  • Neurocircuitry of emotion and cognition in alcoholism: contributions from white matter fiber tractography.

    Tilman Schulte;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Edith V. Sullivan

  • How Acute and Chronic Alcohol Consumption Affects Brain Networks: Insights from Multimodal Neuroimaging

    Tilman Schulte;Brandon G. Oberlin;David A. Kareken;Ksenija Marinkovic

  • Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.

    Dorothe A. Poggel;Erich Kasten;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Ulrike Bunzenthal

  • Automobile driving performance of brain-injured patients with visual field defects.

    Tilman Schulte;Hans Strasburger;Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Erich Kasten

  • The mediating role of cortical thickness and gray matter volume on sleep slow-wave activity during adolescence

    Aimée Goldstone;Adrian R Willoughby;Massimiliano de Zambotti;Peter L Franzen

  • Unusual spontaneous and training induced visual field recovery in a patient with a gunshot lesion.

    D A Poggel;E Kasten;E M Müller-Oehring;B A Sabel

  • Aging with HIV-1 Infection: Motor Functions, Cognition, and Attention – A Comparison with Parkinson’s Disease

    S. DeVaughn;S. DeVaughn;E. M. Müller-Oehring;E. M. Müller-Oehring;B. Markey;H. M. Brontë-Stewart

  • Callosal degradation in HIV-1 infection predicts hierarchical perception: A DTI study

    Eva M. Müller-Oehring;Tilman Schulte;Margaret J. Rosenbloom;Margaret J. Rosenbloom;Adolf Pfefferbaum;Adolf Pfefferbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Adolf Pfefferbaum
Adolf Pfefferbaum Stanford University
Edith V. Sullivan
Edith V. Sullivan Stanford University
Bernhard A. Sabel
Bernhard A. Sabel Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Helen Bronte-Stewart
Helen Bronte-Stewart Stanford University
Fiona C. Baker
Fiona C. Baker SRI International
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Duncan B. Clark
Duncan B. Clark University of Pittsburgh
Brant P. Hasler
Brant P. Hasler University of Pittsburgh
Michael D. De Bellis
Michael D. De Bellis Duke University
Bonnie J. Nagel
Bonnie J. Nagel Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Eva M. Müller-Oehring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles