World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4119
World Ranking
13204
National Ranking
99

Pontus Johnson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pontus Johnson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 168 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pontus Johnson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pontus Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pontus Johnson is affiliated with the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with notable focus areas including Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their work addresses a range of topics, prominently featuring Information and Cyber Security, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Network Security and Intrusion Detection, User Authentication and Security Systems, Security and Verification in Computing, Smart Grid Security and Resilience, as well as Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies.

Pontus Johnson has contributed to multiple publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers & Security
  • ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
  • NOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Frequent collaborators in Johnson's research include Mathias Ekstedt, Robert Lagerström, Sotirios Katsikeas, Jakob Nyberg, and Simon Hacks.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pontus Johnson include:

  • "Research Communities in cyber security: A Comprehensive Literature Review" (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The meta attack language - a formal description" (2023), published in Computers & Security
  • "Automated Security Assessments of Amazon Web Services Environments" (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
  • "Cyber threat response using reinforcement learning in graph-based attack simulations" (2022), published in NOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium
  • "Wide Separation Planets in Time (WISPIT): Discovery of a Gap Hα Protoplanet WISPIT 2b with MagAO-X" (2025), published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Best Publications

  • Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams

    Pontus Johnson;Robert Lagerström;Per Närman;Mårten Simonsson

  • A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them?

    Åsa Lindström;Pontus Johnson;Erik Johansson;Mathias Ekstedt

  • Enterprise Architecture : Models and Analyses for Information Systems Decision Making

    Pontus Johnson;Mathias Ekstedt

  • Where's the Theory for Software Engineering?

    P. Johnson;M. Ekstedt;I. Jacobson

  • A probabilistic relational model for security risk analysis

    Teodor Sommestad;Mathias Ekstedt;Pontus Johnson

  • Using Enterprise Architecture for CIO Decision-Making On the Importance of Theory

    Pontus Johnson;Mathias Ekstedt;Enrique Silva;Leonel Plazaola

  • A Meta Language for Threat Modeling and Attack Simulations

    Pontus Johnson;Robert Lagerström;Mathias Ekstedt

  • A Tool for Enterprise Architecture Analysis

    P. Johnson;E. Johansson;T. Sommestad;J. Ullberg

  • Cyber Security Risks Assessment with Bayesian Defense Graphs and Architectural Models

    Teodor Sommestad;Mathias Ekstedt;Pontus Johnson

  • Model-Based IT Governance Maturity Assessments with Cobit

    Mårten Simonsson;Pontus Johnson;Hanna Wijkström

  • Can the Common Vulnerability Scoring System be Trusted? A Bayesian Analysis

    Pontus Johnson;Robert Lagerstrom;Mathias Ekstedt;Ulrik Franke

  • Enterprise Architecture: A Framework Supporting System Quality Analysis

    P. Narman;P. Johnson;L. Nordstrom

  • Architecture analysis of enterprise systems modifiability - Models, analysis, and validation

    Robert Lagerström;Pontus Johnson;David Höök

  • A method for creating entreprise architecture metamodels : applied to systems modifiability

    Robert Lagerström;Ulrik Franke;Pontus Johnson;Johan Ullberg

  • The IT Organization Modeling and Assessment Tool: Correlating IT Governance Maturity with the Effect of IT

    M. Simonsson;P. Johnson

  • Enterprise Software System Integration : An Architectural Perspective

    Pontus Johnson

  • Data accuracy assessment using enterprise architecture

    Per Narman;Hannes Holm;Pontus Johnson;Johan Konig

  • An architecture framework for enterprise IT service availability analysis

    Ulrik Franke;Pontus Johnson;Johan König

  • Report on the Second SEMAT Workshop on General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE 2013)

    Pontus Johnson;Paul Ralph;Michael Goedicke;Pan-Wei Ng

  • Enterprise architecture dependency analysis using fault trees and Bayesian networks

    Ulrik Franke;Waldo Rocha Flores;Pontus Johnson

  • Securi CAD by Foreseeti: A CAD Tool for Enterprise Cyber Security Management

    Mathias Ekstedt;Pontus Johnson;Robert Lagerstrom;Dan Gorton

Frequent Co-Authors

Mathias Ekstedt
Mathias Ekstedt Royal Institute of Technology
Marten van Sinderen
Marten van Sinderen University of Twente
Erik M. J. Johansson
Erik M. J. Johansson Umeå University
Ivar Jacobson
Ivar Jacobson Ivar Jacobson International
Florian Matthes
Florian Matthes Technical University of Munich
Dewayne E. Perry
Dewayne E. Perry The University of Texas at Austin
Patrick C. K. Hung
Patrick C. K. Hung University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Klaas-Jan Stol
Klaas-Jan Stol University College Cork
Kari Smolander
Kari Smolander Lappeenranta University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and professional qualifications. Whether you’re pursuing a career change or advancing your education, online learning offers accessible choices to fit diverse needs.

For those seeking efficient entry into the workforce, you might consider easy certifications to get online. These certifications can quickly boost your resume and are often recognized by employers in the tech industry.

If you’re interested in earning a higher degree without a long time commitment, explore the shortest master’s degree programs online. Completing an advanced degree in less time allows you to accelerate your career growth in computer science fields.

Some may wonder which graduate degrees offer the best job prospects. Researching the most useful graduate degrees can help you choose a program that aligns with in-demand skills and competitive salaries.

For those beginning their educational journey or looking for a flexible option, online associates degrees can provide a solid foundation in computer science principles.

Best Scientists Citing Pontus Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles