World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5447
World Ranking
11270
National Ranking
443

Patrick C. K. Hung publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick C. K. Hung sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 299 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick C. K. Hung D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick C. K. Hung sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick C. K. Hung is affiliated with the University of Ontario Institute of Technology in Canada. Their research primarily spans the domain of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work covers diverse main research topics such as:

  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Caching and Content Delivery

Among the recent papers authored under their name are:

  • "A decentralized lightweight blockchain-based authentication mechanism for IoT systems", 2020, published in Cluster Computing
  • "Carbon-Aware Computing for Datacenters", 2022, published in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • "IoT Microservice Deployment in Edge-Cloud Hybrid Environment Using Reinforcement Learning", 2020, published in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • "A Survey on Web Service QoS Prediction Methods", 2020, published in IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
  • "EVFL: An explainable vertical federated learning for data-oriented Artificial Intelligence systems", 2022, published in Journal of Systems Architecture

Common publication venues for Patrick C. K. Hung include:

  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (13 publications)
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (6 publications)
  • IEEE Transactions on Services Computing (4 publications)
  • Library Hi Tech (4 publications)
  • IEEE Access (4 publications)

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Farkhund Iqbal
  • Marcelo Fantinato
  • Sarajane Marques Peres
  • Zhihui Lu
  • Zhangbing Zhou

Patrick C. K. Hung's research spans interdisciplinary areas that integrate advanced computing paradigms such as blockchain, edge computing, and artificial intelligence with practical applications in IoT systems, cloud infrastructure, and human-computer interaction environments.

Best Publications

  • A decentralized lightweight blockchain-based authentication mechanism for IoT systems

    Umair Khalid;Muhammad Asim;Thar Baker;Patrick C. K. Hung

  • An Efficient Centroid-Based Routing Protocol for Energy Management in WSN-Assisted IoT

    Jian Shen;Anxi Wang;Chen Wang;Patrick C. K. Hung

  • Centralized and Distributed Anonymization for High-Dimensional Healthcare Data

    Noman Mohammed;Benjamin C. M. Fung;Patrick C. K. Hung;Cheuk-Kwong Lee

  • Carbon-Aware Computing for Datacenters.

    Ana Radovanovic;Ross Koningstein;Ian Schneider;Bokan Chen

  • Anonymizing healthcare data: a case study on the blood transfusion service

    Noman Mohammed;Benjamin C.M. Fung;Patrick C.K. Hung;Cheuk-kwong Lee

  • WS-Negotiation: an overview of research issues

    P.C.K. Hung;Haifei Li;Jun-Jang Jeng

  • A Hybrid Framework for Sentiment Analysis Using Genetic Algorithm Based Feature Reduction

    Farkhund Iqbal;Jahanzeb Maqbool Hashmi;Benjamin C. M. Fung;Rabia Batool

  • A Highly Accurate Prediction Algorithm for Unknown Web Service QoS Values

    You Ma;Shangguang Wang;Patrick C.K. Hung;Ching-Hsien Hsu

  • Constructing a Global Social Service Network for Better Quality of Web Service Discovery

    Wuhui Chen;Incheon Paik;Patrick C. K. Hung

  • Service Pricing Decision in Cyber-Physical Systems: Insights from Game Theory

    Xiao Liu;Mianxiong Dong;Kaoru Ota;Patrick Hung

  • Privacy-preserving data mashup

    Noman Mohammed;Benjamin C. M. Fung;Ke Wang;Patrick C. K. Hung

  • Cyber child pornography: A review paper of the social and legal issues and remedies—and a proposed technological solution

    Bernadette H. Schell;Miguel Vargas Martin;Patrick C.K. Hung;Luis Rueda

  • A secure workflow model

    Patrick C. K. Hung;Kamalakar Karlapalem

  • IoT Microservice Deployment in Edge-Cloud Hybrid Environment Using Reinforcement Learning

    Lulu Chen;Yangchuan Xu;Zhihui Lu;Jie Wu

  • Developing e-Negotiation support with a meta-modeling approach in a web services environment

    Dickson K. W. Chiu;S. C. Cheung;Patrick C. K. Hung;Sherina Y. Y. Chiu

  • Service-Oriented Architecture for High-Dimensional Private Data Mashup

    B. C. M. Fung;T. Trojer;P. C. K. Hung;Li Xiong

  • Towards ubiquitous tourist service coordination and process integration: A collaborative travel agent system architecture with semantic web services

    Dickson K. Chiu;Yves T. Yueh;Ho-Fung Leung;Patrick C. Hung

  • Privacy-preserving data publishing for cluster analysis

    Benjamin C. M. Fung;Ke Wang;Lingyu Wang;Patrick C. K. Hung

  • A Survey on Web Service QoS Prediction Methods

    Seyyed Hamid Ghafouri;Seyyed Mohsen Hashemi;Patrick C. K. Hung

  • A Novel Data Placement Strategy for Data-Sharing Scientific Workflows in Heterogeneous Edge-Cloud Computing Environments

    Xin Du;Songtao Tang;Zhihui Lu;Jie Wet

  • Towards standardized Web services privacy technologies

    P.C.K. Hung;E. Ferrari;B. Carminati

  • Intelligent and Knowledge-Based Computing for Business and Organizational Advancements

    Hideyasu Sasaki;Dickson K.W. Chiu;Epaminondas Kapetanios;Patrick C.K. Hung

Frequent Co-Authors

Dickson K. W. Chiu
Dickson K. W. Chiu University of Hong Kong
Shih-Chia Huang
Shih-Chia Huang National Taipei University of Technology
Benjamin C. M. Fung
Benjamin C. M. Fung McGill University
Shing-Chi Cheung
Shing-Chi Cheung Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Elena Ferrari
Elena Ferrari University of Insubria
Barbara Carminati
Barbara Carminati University of Insubria
Qing Li
Qing Li Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Claudio Bartolini
Claudio Bartolini Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Michael Jenkin
Michael Jenkin York University
Sy-Yen Kuo
Sy-Yen Kuo National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Computer Science opens the door to a variety of related pathways in technology and engineering. For example, many students wonder, can you get a physics degree online? The good news is that reputable universities now offer flexible online options, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

Data science is another lucrative field close to computer science. With the rise in demand for analytics professionals, students can consider accredited data science degrees offered online at affordable rates. These programs blend computing with statistical skills, preparing graduates for high-growth careers.

Engineering is also a popular extension. Many institutions now have streamlined electrical engineering degree online admissions processes, allowing more students to access quality education from anywhere.

For those seeking faster entry to the tech workforce, there are also specialized short certificate programs that pay well. These programs focus on skill-building and can lead to rewarding, well-paying roles without the need for a four-year degree.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick C. K. Hung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles