World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4605
World Ranking
13992
National Ranking
5560

Constantine D. Polychronopoulos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantine D. Polychronopoulos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Constantine D. Polychronopoulos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantine D. Polychronopoulos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Constantine D. Polychronopoulos is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their academic profile includes contributions within this institution, reflecting engagement in scientific research and scholarship.

Although specific details about publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are not listed, their association with a major research university suggests involvement in ongoing academic activities and potential collaborations within that environment.

The available information does not provide explicit fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work related to their research. Therefore, no specific academic disciplines or research areas can be detailed in this profile.

No records of awards or honors have been indicated, and there are no noted book publications or documented recent papers to report. The lack of detailed publication data means their scholarly output cannot be outlined at this time.

Constantine D. Polychronopoulos is currently active and is not reported as deceased.

Best Publications

  • Guided Self-Scheduling: A Practical Scheduling Scheme for Parallel Supercomputers

    Constantine D. Polychronopoulos;David J. Kuck

  • Service-based compression of content within a network communication system

    Chris Koopmans;Constantine Polychronopoulos;Nicholas Stavrakos

  • Parafrase-2: an environment for parallelizing, partitioning, synchronizing, and scheduling programs on multiprocessors

    Constantine D. Polychronopoulos;Milind B. Girkar;Mohammad Reza Haghighat;Chia Ling Lee

  • Parallel programming and compilers

    Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

  • Symbolic analysis for parallelizing compilers

    Mohammad R. Haghighat;Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

  • Quality of service management for multiple connections within a network communication system

    Sungwon Ha;Sung-wook Han;Upamanyu Madhow;Tae-eun Kim

  • Automatic extraction of functional parallelism from ordinary programs

    Unknown

  • Compiler optimizations for enhancing parallelism and their impact on architecture design

    C.D. Polychronopoulos

  • System and methods for providing differentiated services within a network communication system

    David Craig;Constantine Polychronopoulos;Sung Wook Han

  • Architectural and compiler support for energy reduction in the memory hierarchy of high performance microprocessors

    Nikolaos Bellas Ibrahim Hajj;George Stamoulis;N. Bellas;C. Polychronopoulos

  • Architectural and compiler techniques for energy reduction in high-performance microprocessors

    N. Bellas;I.N. Hajj;C.D. Polychronopoulos;G. Stamoulis

  • The structure of parafrase-2: an advanced parallelizing compiler for C and FORTRAN

    Constantine D. Polychronopoulos;Miliand B. Gikar;Mohammad R. Haghighat;Chia L. Lee

  • Using dynamic cache management techniques to reduce energy in a high-performance processor

    Nikolaos Bellas;Ibrahim Hajj;Constantine Polychronopoulos

  • Energy and performance improvements in microprocessor design using a loop cache

    N. Bellas;I. Hajj;C. Polychronopoulos;G. Stamoulis

  • EFFECTS OF PROGRAM RESTRUCTURING, ALGORITHM CHANGE, AND ARCHITECTURE CHOICE ON PROGRAM PERFORMANCE.

    David J. Kuck;Ahmed H. Sameh;Ron Cytron;Alexander V. Veidenbaum

  • Fast barrier synchronization hardware

    Carl J. Beckmann;Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

  • EXECUTION OF PARALLEL LOOPS ON PARALLEL PROCESSOR SYSTEMS.

    Constantine D. Polychronopoulos;David J. Kuck;David A. Padua

  • The hierarchical task graph as a universal intermediate representation

    Milind Girkar;Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

  • User-level dynamic page migration for multiprogrammed shared-memory multiprocessors

    D.S. Nikolopoulos;T.S. Papatheodorou;C.D. Polychronopoulos;J. Labarta

  • Is Data Distribution Necessary in OpenMP

    Dimitrios S. Nikolopoulos;Theodore S. Papatheodorou;Constantine D. Polychronopoulos;Jesus Labarta

  • Symbolic analysis for parallelizing compilers

    Unknown

  • Symbolic Program Analysis and Optimization for Parallelizing Compilers

    Mohammad R. Haghighat;Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

  • Symbolic Analysis: A Basis for Parallelization, Optimization, and Scheduling of Programs

    Mohammad R. Haghighat;Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

  • Utilizing multidimensional loop parallelism on large scale parallel processor systems

    C.D. Polychronopoulos;D.J. Kuck;D.A. Padua

  • On the Performance Potential of Different Types of Speculative Thread-Level Parallelism

    Arun Kejariwal;Xinmin Tian;Wei Li;Milind Girkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexandru Nicolau
Alexandru Nicolau University of California, Irvine
Eduard Ayguadé
Eduard Ayguadé Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Jesús Labarta
Jesús Labarta Barcelona Supercomputing Center
David J. Kuck
David J. Kuck University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ibrahim N. Hajj
Ibrahim N. Hajj University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David Padua
David Padua University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ian Foster
Ian Foster University of Chicago
Kyle A. Gallivan
Kyle A. Gallivan Florida State University
James C. Browne
James C. Browne The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and flexible career options. Students interested in growing fields like analytics may want to review the data science learning path, which offers both affordability and strong career outcomes.

For those curious about applied technology, numerous online electrical engineering courses USA programs provide alternative or complementary pathways. These courses can help you develop a broad technical background and skills valued across many industries.

Not everyone has the time for a full degree program. In these cases, consider short certificate programs that pay well. Certifications in coding, cybersecurity, or data analytics can quickly boost your employability and earning potential.

If advancing your career quickly is a priority, there are also fastest masters degree online options. These accelerated programs offer advanced credentials with minimal interruption to your personal or professional life.

Best Scientists Citing Constantine D. Polychronopoulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles