World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
8340
World Ranking
8524
National Ranking
3045

Ming Cai publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming Cai sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 137 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Ming Cai D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming Cai sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ming Cai is currently affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Engineering, and Oceanography.

The scientist's work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Ming Cai has published extensively with frequent appearances in the following publication venues:

  • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Nature Communications
  • Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
  • Frontiers in Earth Science

Their recent papers illustrate diverse research areas and include the following titles:

  • "Evolution characteristics of groundwater and its response to climate and land-cover changes in the oasis of dried-up river in Tarim Basin," 2020, Journal of Hydrology
  • "A less cloudy picture of the inter-model spread in future global warming projections," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Inferring future warming in the Arctic from the observed global warming trend and CMIP6 simulations," 2021, Advances in Climate Change Research
  • "An Isentropic Mass Circulation View on the Extreme Cold Events in the 2020/21 Winter," 2022, Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
  • "Seasonally Evolving Trends Explain the North-South Dipole Pattern Observed in Tibetan Plateau Precipitation," 2023, Geophysical Research Letters

The scientist works collaboratively with several frequent coauthors, including Xiaoming Hu, Jie Sun, Jieru Ma, Song Yang, and Yi Deng. These collaborations have contributed to a significant number of their publications, reflecting sustained research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate

    Eugenia Kalnay;Ming Cai

  • A Decomposition of Feedback Contributions to Polar Warming Amplification

    Patrick C. Taylor;Ming Cai;Aixue Hu;Jerry Meehl

  • Unresolved issues with the assessment of multidecadal global land surface temperature trends

    Roger A. Pielke;Christopher A. Davey;Dev Niyogi;Souleymane Fall

  • Seasonality of polar surface warming amplification in climate simulations

    Jianhua Lu;Ming Cai

  • Symbiotic Relation between Planetary and Synoptic-Scale Waves.

    Ming Cai;Mankin Mak

  • Dynamical implications of the orientation of atmospheric eddies: a local energetics perspective

    M. Cai;S. Yang;H. M. Van Den Dool;V. E. Kousky

  • Observational evidence of sensitivity of surface climate changes to land types and urbanization

    Young-Kwon Lim;Ming Cai;Eugenia Kalnay;Liming Zhou

  • Local Barotropic Instability

    Mankin Mak;Ming Cai

  • Energy consumption and the unexplained winter warming over northern Asia and North America

    Guang J. Zhang;Ming Cai;Aixue Hu

  • A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part I: formulation

    Jianhua Lu;Ming Cai

  • Dynamical amplification of polar warming

    Ming Cai

  • Use of the breeding technique to estimate the structure of the analysis "errors of the day"

    M. Corazza;M. Corazza;E. Kalnay;D. J. Patil;S.-C. Yang

  • Quantifying contributions to polar warming amplification in an idealized coupled general circulation model

    Jianhua Lu;Ming Cai

  • Estimation of the impact of land-surface forcings on temperature trends in eastern United States

    Eugenia Kalnay;Ming Cai;Hong Li;Jayakar Tobin

  • Documentation of uncertainties and biases associated with surface temperature measurement sites for climate change assessment

    Roger Pielke;John Nielsen-Gammon;Christopher Davey;James Randal Angel

  • Impact of land use and precipitation changes on surface temperature trends in Argentina

    Mario N. Nuñez;Héctor H. Ciapessoni;Alfredo Rolla;Eugenia Kalnay

  • Covariance Between Arctic Sea Ice and Clouds Within Atmospheric State Regimes at the Satellite Footprint Level

    Patrick C. Taylor;Seiji Kato;Kuan-Man Xu;Ming Cai

  • A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part II: Method demonstrations and comparisons

    Ming Cai;Jianhua Lu

  • On the Basic Dynamics of Regional Cyclogenesis

    Ming Cai;Mankin Mak

  • Bred Vectors of the Zebiak–Cane Model and Their Potential Application to ENSO Predictions

    Ming Cai;Eugenia Kalnay;Zoltan Toth

  • Reply to comment by David E. Parker et al. on: Unresolved issues with the assessment of multidecadal global land surface temperature trends

    Roger A. Pielke;Christopher A. Davey;Dev Niyogi;Souleymane Fall

Frequent Co-Authors

Song Yang
Song Yang Guizhou University
Eugenia Kalnay
Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland, College Park
Guoxiong Wu
Guoxiong Wu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Guang J. Zhang
Guang J. Zhang Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Roger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke University of Colorado Boulder
Dev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi The University of Texas at Austin
Kenneth G. Hubbard
Kenneth G. Hubbard University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Kevin P. Gallo
Kevin P. Gallo National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Aixue Hu
Aixue Hu National Center for Atmospheric Research
Bohua Huang
Bohua Huang George Mason University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities and enhance expertise. Many professionals consider advanced education pathways, such as an online eds to edd bridge program, which provides a streamlined route for educators aiming to specialize in environmental education leadership.

Those wanting to make a social impact in environmental policy or community health might find programs like the cheapest online dsw programs appealing, combining social work with environmental advocacy in underserved areas.

Students starting their academic journey or balancing multiple commitments might choose an online general studies degree affordable option that allows flexible course selection, enabling them to tailor studies toward environmental topics without high costs.

For those looking for a less demanding credential to complement their environmental science background, pursuing the easiest bachelor's degree to get can offer a practical way to gain additional qualifications quickly, opening doors to diverse career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Ming Cai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles