World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
27934
World Ranking
7732
National Ranking
13

Ondrej Chum publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondrej Chum sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 98 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ondrej Chum D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ondrej Chum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ondrej Chum is affiliated with the Czech Technical University in Prague in the Czech Republic. The primary field of study is computer science, with a focus on several subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, aerospace engineering, media technology, and signal processing.

The scientist's research topics cover various areas such as:

  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging

Recent publications include:

  • "Minimal Solvers for Rectifying From Radially-Distorted Conjugate Translations," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • "Minimal Solvers for Rectifying from Radially-Distorted Scales and Change of Scales," 2020, International Journal of Computer Vision
  • "Learning and Aggregating Deep Local Descriptors for Instance-Level Recognition," 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • "Edge Augmentation for Large-Scale Sketch Recognition without Sketches," 2022, 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)
  • "The 2021 Image Similarity Dataset and Challenge," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequently collaborating co-authors are:

  • Giorgos Tolias
  • Nikos Efthymiadis
  • Nikolaos-Antonios Ypsilantis
  • Tomás Jenícek
  • Yannis Avrithis

Publication venues where Ondrej Chum has appeared multiple times include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • International Journal of Computer Vision
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Best Publications

  • Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions

    Jiri Matas;Ondrej Chum;Martin Urban;Tomás Pajdla

  • Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching

    J. Philbin;O. Chum;M. Isard;J. Sivic

  • Lost in quantization: Improving particular object retrieval in large scale image databases

    J. Philbin;O. Chum;M. Isard;J. Sivic

  • Matching with PROSAC - progressive sample consensus

    O. Chum;J. Matas

  • Fine-Tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotation

    Filip Radenovic;Giorgos Tolias;Ondrej Chum

  • Total Recall: Automatic Query Expansion with a Generative Feature Model for Object Retrieval

    O. Chum;J. Philbin;J. Sivic;M. Isard

  • Locally Optimized RANSAC

    Ondřej Chum;Jiří Matas;Jiří Matas;Josef Kittler

  • Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions

    Jiri Matas;Ondrej Chum;Martin Urban;Tomás Pajdla

  • USAC: A Universal Framework for Random Sample Consensus

    R. Raguram;O. Chum;M. Pollefeys;J. Matas

  • CNN Image Retrieval Learns from BoW: Unsupervised Fine-Tuning with Hard Examples

    Filip Radenović;Giorgos Tolias;Ondřej Chum

  • Near Duplicate Image Detection: min-Hash and tf-idf Weighting.

    Ondrej Chum;James Philbin;Andrew Zisserman

  • Label Propagation for Deep Semi-Supervised Learning

    Ahmet Iscen;Giorgos Tolias;Yannis Avrithis;Ondrej Chum

  • Optimal Randomized RANSAC

    O. Chum;J. Matas

  • Negative Evidences and Co-occurences in Image Retrieval: The Benefit of PCA and Whitening

    Hervé Jégou;Ondřej Chum

  • An Exemplar Model for Learning Object Classes

    O. Chum;A. Zisserman

  • Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking

    Filip Radenovic;Ahmet Iscen;Giorgos Tolias;Yannis Avrithis

  • Total recall II: Query expansion revisited

    Ondrej Chum;Andrej Mikulik;Michal Perdoch;Jiri Matas

  • Geometric min-Hashing: Finding a (thick) needle in a haystack

    Ondrej Chum;Michal Perdoch;Jiri Matas

  • Efficient representation of local geometry for large scale object retrieval

    Michal Perd'och;Ondrej Chum;Jiri Matas

  • Randomized RANSAC with Td,d test

    Jiri Matas;Ondrej Chum

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiri Matas
Jiri Matas Czech Technical University in Prague
Yannis Avrithis
Yannis Avrithis Institute of Advanced Research on Artificial Intelligence (IARAI)
Tomas Pajdla
Tomas Pajdla Czech Technical University in Prague
Andrew Zisserman
Andrew Zisserman University of Oxford
Josef Sivic
Josef Sivic Czech Technical University in Prague
Michael Isard
Michael Isard Google (United States)
Jan-Michael Frahm
Jan-Michael Frahm University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Hervé Jégou
Hervé Jégou Facebook (United States)
Josef Kittler
Josef Kittler University of Surrey
Cordelia Schmid
Cordelia Schmid French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up many flexible, online education options for students and professionals. For those looking to expand their business acumen, consider the most affordable online mba programs. These programs offer a cost-effective pathway to management and leadership roles in tech and beyond.

Those seeking to upskill quickly can look into one year masters programs. These intensive courses are designed to deliver advanced skills in a compressed timeframe, ideal for jump-starting a new tech career or advancing in your current role.

If speed is your priority, you might be interested in the fastest degree to get. These online programs can put you on a fast track to high-paying positions within the tech industry and related fields.

Additionally, for those specifically interested in artificial intelligence, exploring the cheapest online master's in artificial intelligence could be a smart move. Affordable options make it feasible to specialize in this growing sector without a heavy financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Ondrej Chum

Trending Scientists