World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeremy Peter Cheadle

Jeremy Peter Cheadle

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
18448
World Ranking
13566
National Ranking
1059

Jeremy Peter Cheadle publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Peter Cheadle sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 127 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jeremy Peter Cheadle D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Peter Cheadle sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy Peter Cheadle is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the genetics and molecular biology of colorectal cancer, with extensive work surrounding genetic factors, cancer genomics, and diagnostic approaches within oncology.

The main fields of study for Cheadle include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their subfields of expertise encompass Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Molecular Biology.

The primary topics covered in their work are:

  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal cancer treatments and studies
  • Genetic associations and epidemiology
  • Cancer genomics and diagnostics
  • Colorectal cancer screening and detection
  • Molecular biology techniques and applications
  • RNA modifications and cancer

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Jeremy Peter Cheadle include:

  • Deciphering colorectal cancer genetics through multi-omic analysis of 100,204 cases and 154,587 controls of European and east Asian ancestries (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Germline MBD4 deficiency causes a multi-tumor predisposition syndrome (2022, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • Pan-Cancer Interrogation of MUTYH Variants Reveals Biallelic Inactivation and Defective Base Excision Repair Across a Spectrum of Solid Tumors (2024, JCO Precision Oncology)
  • Fine-mapping analysis including over 254,000 East Asian and European descendants identifies 136 putative colorectal cancer susceptibility genes (2024, Nature Communications)
  • A genome-wide search for determinants of survival in 1926 patients with advanced colorectal cancer with follow-up in over 22,000 patients (2021, European Journal of Cancer)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cheadle include:

  • Tim Maughan
  • Claire Palles
  • Richard Kaplan
  • Rachel Kerr
  • David Kerr

The publication venues where Cheadle most frequently publishes include:

  • Nature Genetics
  • International Journal of Cancer
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • JCO Precision Oncology
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Identification of the tuberous sclerosis gene TSC1 on chromosome 9q34

    Marjon van Slegtenhorst;Ronald de Hoogt;Caroline Hermans;Mark Nellist

  • Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic G:C→T:A mutations in colorectal tumors

    Nada Al-Tassan;Nikolas H. Chmiel;Julie Helen Maynard;Nick Fleming

  • Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial

    Timothyn Stanley Maughan;Richard Alexander Adams;Chris Smith;Angela M. Meade

  • Relationship between trinucleotide repeat expansion and phenotypic variation in Huntington's disease

    Russell G. Snell;John C. MacMillan;Jeremy Peter Cheadle;Iain Fenton

  • Mismatch Repair Status and BRAF Mutation Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Pooled Analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS Studies

    Sabine Venderbosch;Iris D Nagtegaal;Timothy S Maughan;Christopher G Smith

  • Interaction Between Hamartin and Tuberin, the TSC1 and TSC2 Gene Products

    Marjon van Slegtenhorst;Mark Nellist;Bas Nagelkerken;Jeremy Cheadle

  • Comprehensive Mutation Analysis of TSC1 and TSC2—and Phenotypic Correlations in 150 Families with Tuberous Sclerosis

    Alistair C. Jones;Magitha M. Shyamsundar;Meinir W. Thomas;Julie Helen Maynard

  • Autosomal recessive colorectal adenomatous polyposis due to inherited mutations of MYH

    Julian Roy Sampson;Sunil Dolwani;Sian Jones;Diana Eccles

  • Molecular genetic advances in tuberous sclerosis

    Jeremy Peter Cheadle;Mary Pat Reeve;Julian Roy Sampson;David J. Kwiatkowski

  • Renal cystic disease in tuberous sclerosis: role of the polycystic kidney disease 1 gene

    Julian R. Sampson;Magitha M. Maheshwar;Richard Aspinwall;Peter Thompson

  • Meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies identifies susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer at 1q41, 3q26.2, 12q13.13 and 20q13.33

    Richard S Houlston;Jeremy Peter Cheadle;Sara E. Dobbins;Albert Tenesa

  • Population variation of common cystic fibrosis mutations

    Jeremy Peter Cheadle

  • Optimal Temperature Selection for Mutation Detection by Denaturing HPLC and Comparison to Single-Stranded Conformation Polymorphism and Heteroduplex Analysis

    Alistair C. Jones;Jehannine Austin;Nancy Hansen;Bastiaan Hoogendoorn

  • Cloning and characterization of a functional human homolog of Escherichia coli endonuclease III.

    Richard Aspinwall;Dominic G. Rothwell;Teresa Roldan-Arjona;Catherine Anselmino

  • Long-read sequence analysis of the MECP2 gene in Rett syndrome patients: correlation of disease severity with mutation type and location

    Jeremy Peter Cheadle;Harinder Gill;Nick Fleming;Julie Helen Maynard

  • Molecular Genetic and Phenotypic Analysis Reveals Differences between TSC1 and TSC2 Associated Familial and Sporadic Tuberous Sclerosis

    Alistair C. Jones;Claire E. Daniells;Russell G. Snell;Maria Tachataki

  • The tuberous sclerosis-1 (TSC1) gene product hamartin suppresses cell growth and augments the expression of the TSC2 product tuberin by inhibiting its ubiquitination

    Giovanna Benvenuto;Shaowei Li;Samantha J. Brown;Richard Braverman

  • Common variation near CDKN1A, POLD3 and SHROOM2 influences colorectal cancer risk

    Malcolm G Dunlop;Sara E Dobbins;Susan Mary Farrington;Angela M Jones

  • Multiple Common Susceptibility Variants near BMP Pathway Loci GREM1, BMP4, and BMP2 Explain Part of the Missing Heritability of Colorectal Cancer

    Ian P. M. Tomlinson;Luis G. Carvajal-Carmona;Sara E. Dobbins;Albert Tenesa

  • Association analyses identify 31 new risk loci for colorectal cancer susceptibility

    P J Law;M Timofeeva;C Fernandez-Rozadilla;P Broderick

Frequent Co-Authors

Julian Roy Sampson
Julian Roy Sampson Cardiff University
Richard S. Houlston
Richard S. Houlston Institute of Cancer Research
Malcolm G. Dunlop
Malcolm G. Dunlop University of Edinburgh
Ian Tomlinson
Ian Tomlinson University of Oxford
David J. Kerr
David J. Kerr University of Oxford
Lauri A. Aaltonen
Lauri A. Aaltonen University of Helsinki
Graham Casey
Graham Casey University of Virginia
Mark A. Jenkins
Mark A. Jenkins University of Melbourne
David V. Conti
David V. Conti University of Southern California
Daniel D. Buchanan
Daniel D. Buchanan University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degree options and career pathways in the health and life sciences fields. Flexible programs now make it easier than ever to advance your education while balancing work or family commitments.

For those interested in starting or accelerating their journey, a BS in biology online provides fundamental knowledge for diverse scientific careers or prepares you for graduate and professional studies. Alternatively, if your focus is on nutrition and health, specialized online nutrition degrees offer a pathway into dietetics, wellness consulting, or nutrition research.

Healthcare roles are also popular destinations. If you’re currently a medical assistant looking to expand your responsibilities, medical assistant to lpn programs provide a direct online route to Licensed Practical Nurse qualifications. For those starting their nursing career, an online asn degree (Associate of Science in Nursing) is an accessible way to enter this high-demand field.

Whether you aim for research, clinical care, or public health, these online degrees link your passion for biology and biochemistry to dynamic career options.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy Peter Cheadle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles