World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
63
Citations
18696
World Ranking
1786
National Ranking
32

Patrick Matthias publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Matthias sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 127 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Patrick Matthias D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Matthias sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Matthias is affiliated with the Friedrich Miescher Institute in Switzerland. Their research work spans biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, immunology, and microbiology, with a primary focus on molecular biology and immunology.

The scientist's research topics cover several key areas including histone deacetylase inhibitors research, peptidase inhibition and analysis, ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, protein degradation and inhibitors, signaling pathways in disease, interferon and immune responses, and HIV research and treatment.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Longlong Wang, Yohei Yamauchi, Jacint Sanchez, Georg Kempf, and Chun Cao.

Patrick Matthias has published extensively in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications, Cell Reports, and Methods in Molecular Biology.

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope of their research:

  • The disordered N-terminus of HDAC6 is a microtubule-binding domain critical for efficient tubulin deacetylation, 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • EEF1A1 deacetylation enables transcriptional activation of remyelination, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Disrupting the HDAC6-ubiquitin interaction impairs infection by influenza and Zika virus and cellular stress pathways, 2022, Cell Reports
  • How Influenza Virus Uses Host Cell Pathways during Uncoating, 2021, Cells
  • OBF1 and Oct factors control the germinal center transcriptional program, 2021, Blood

Best Publications

  • Rapid detection of octamer binding proteins with ‘mini extracts’, prepared from a small number of cells

    Edgar Schreiber;Patrick Matthias;Michael M. Müller;Walter Schaffner

  • HDAC-6 interacts with and deacetylates tubulin and microtubules in vivo

    Yu Zhang;Na Li;Cécile Caron;Gabriele Matthias

  • Mice Lacking Histone Deacetylase 6 Have Hyperacetylated Tubulin but Are Viable and Develop Normally

    Yu Zhang;So Hee Kwon;Teppei Yamaguchi;Fabien Cubizolles

  • A cloned octamer transcription factor stimulates transcription from lymphoid-specific promoters in non-B cells.

    Michael M. Müller;Siegfried Ruppert;Walter Schaffner;Patrick Matthias

  • OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins

    Michel Strubin;John W Newell;Patrick Matthias

  • The deacetylase HDAC6 is a novel critical component of stress granules involved in the stress response

    SoHee Kwon;Yu Zhang;Yu Zhang;Patrick Matthias

  • HDAC6 controls major cell response pathways to cytotoxic accumulation of protein aggregates.

    Cyril Boyault;Yu Zhang;Sabrina Fritah;Cécile Caron

  • High bone resorption in adult aging transgenic mice overexpressing cbfa1/runx2 in cells of the osteoblastic lineage.

    Valérie Geoffroy;Michaela Kneissel;Brigitte Fournier;Alan Boyde

  • Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 act in concert to promote the G1-to-S progression

    Teppei Yamaguchi;Fabien Cubizolles;Yu Zhang;Nina Reichert

  • HDAC6–p97/VCP controlled polyubiquitin chain turnover

    Cyril Boyault;Benoit Gilquin;Yu Zhang;Vladimir Rybin

  • B-cell-specific coactivator OBF-1/OCA-B/Bob1 required for immune response and germinal centre formation

    Daniel B. Schubart;Antonius Rolink;Marie H. Kosco-Vilbois;Florence Botteri

  • Identification of a novel lymphoid specific octamer binding protein (OTF-2B) by proteolytic clipping bandshift assay (PCBA)

    E. Schreiber;P. Matthias;M. M. Müller;W. Schaffner

  • Transcriptional networks in developing and mature B cells.

    Patrick Matthias;Antonius G. Rolink

  • Structural Insights Into Hdac6 Tubulin Deacetylation and its Selective Inhibition

    Yasuyuki Miyake;Jeremy J Keusch;Longlong Wang;Makoto Saito

  • Histone deacetylase 6 and heat shock protein 90 control the functions of Foxp3(+) T-regulatory cells.

    Edwin F. de Zoeten;Liqing Wang;Kyle Butler;Ulf H. Beier

  • Acetylation site specificities of lysine deacetylase inhibitors in human cells.

    Christian Schölz;Brian T Weinert;Sebastian A Wagner;Petra Beli

  • Influenza A virus uses the aggresome processing machinery for host cell entry.

    Indranil Banerjee;Yasuyuki Miyake;Samuel Philip Nobs;Christoph Schneider

  • Cell type-specificity elements of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene enhancer.

    T. Gerster;P. Matthias;M. Thali;J. Jiricny

  • Acetylation of intrinsically disordered regions regulates phase separation.

    Makoto Saito;Makoto Saito;Daniel Hess;Jan Eglinger;Anatol W Fritsch

  • Differential effects of selective HDAC inhibitors on macrophage inflammatory responses to the Toll-like receptor 4 agonist LPS

    Maria A. Halili;Melanie R. Andrews;Larisa I. Labzin;Kate Schroder

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Seiser
Christian Seiser Medical University of Vienna
Walter Schaffner
Walter Schaffner University of Zurich
Yu Zhang
Yu Zhang Peking University
Saadi Khochbin
Saadi Khochbin Grenoble Alpes University
Wilfried Ellmeier
Wilfried Ellmeier Medical University of Vienna
Lynn M. Corcoran
Lynn M. Corcoran Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Daniel Hess
Daniel Hess Friedrich Miescher Institute
Günter Steiner
Günter Steiner Medical University of Vienna
Antonius Rolink
Antonius Rolink University of Basel
Ueli Suter
Ueli Suter École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in molecular biology or a related field, there are several online degree pathways that can broaden your opportunities, especially in healthcare and research. Many students begin with foundational degrees before progressing to advanced clinical or research roles.

For registered nurses looking to advance their careers efficiently, exploring asn to fnp programs provides a bridge from an associate’s degree in nursing to a family nurse practitioner credential. For those without a nursing background, accelerated options like online msn programs for non nurses can rapidly prepare graduates for higher-level positions in nursing.

Students comparing programs will find that wgu vs chamberlain offers insights into top online RN-to-BSN options, helping you choose the best fit for your educational and career goals. Affordability is also a consideration—especially for continuing your studies—which is why many look into bsn to msn programs online to find budget-friendly pathways to an advanced degree.

Whether you’re set on molecular biology or exploring overlapping careers in healthcare, these online programs offer flexible paths tailored to your needs and aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Matthias

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles