World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 59 725 656 313 262 301 13419

Richard T. Lahey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard T. Lahey between 1967 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard T. Lahey published across 55 years, from 1967 to 2021, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1990. 1 of the 319 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1990. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 3 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 14 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 11 publications 1983: 14 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1967 2021

319 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard T. Lahey: publications per year, 1967 to 2021
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 1
1970 1
1971 3
1972 4
1973 3
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 2
1978 7
1979 6
1980 14
1981 11
1982 11
1983 14
1984 7
1985 7
1986 13
1987 11
1988 4
1989 10
1990 15
1991 12
1992 12
1993 11
1994 12
1995 6
1996 6
1997 5
1998 3
1999 8
2000 5
2001 1
2002 7
2003 11
2004 7
2005 11
2006 12
2007 3
2008 7
2009 8
2010 9
2011 6
2012 3
2013 1
2014 1
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 319
Download as CSV

Richard T. Lahey publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Lahey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 297–306 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 301 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74 301
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard T. Lahey D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Lahey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42 59
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to the fields of multiphase flow and heat transfer and nuclear reactor safety technology.
  • 1980 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Mechanics
  • Thermodynamics

Mechanics, Two-phase flow, Thermodynamics, Flow and Turbulence are his primary areas of study. His work on Bubble as part of general Mechanics study is frequently connected to Probability density function, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. Richard T. Lahey has included themes like Meteorology, Pipe flow and Laminar flow in his Two-phase flow study.

His study in Thermodynamics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Mathematical model, Two-fluid model and Isosceles triangle. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Fluid dynamics and Mathematical analysis. Richard T. Lahey studied Turbulence and Statistical physics that intersect with Fractal.

His most cited work include:

  • Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow (540 citations)
  • The thermal hydraulics of a boiling water nuclear reactor (381 citations)
  • 3-D turbulence structure and phase distribution measurements in bubbly two-phase flows (347 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Richard T. Lahey mainly investigates Mechanics, Two-phase flow, Thermodynamics, Bubble and Boiling. His work investigates the relationship between Mechanics and topics such as Classical mechanics that intersect with problems in Lift. His Two-phase flow study also includes fields such as

  • Fluid dynamics, which have a strong connection to Fluid mechanics,
  • Pipe flow that intertwine with fields like Open-channel flow.

He combines subjects such as Flow and Flow with his study of Thermodynamics. His work is dedicated to discovering how Bubble, Cavitation are connected with Neutron and other disciplines. His work deals with themes such as Nuclear engineering, Nuclear reactor and Control theory, which intersect with Boiling.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mechanics (55.26%)
  • Two-phase flow (29.61%)
  • Thermodynamics (19.41%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2004-2021)?

  • Mechanics (55.26%)
  • Bubble (15.79%)
  • Turbulence (13.49%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Richard T. Lahey mainly focuses on Mechanics, Bubble, Turbulence, Air entrainment and Direct numerical simulation. The concepts of his Mechanics study are interwoven with issues in Meteorology and Classical mechanics. His Bubble research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Nuclear fusion, Cavitation and Dynamics.

His study looks at the intersection of Turbulence and topics like Data flow model with Potential flow and Two fluid. In Direct numerical simulation, Richard T. Lahey works on issues like Statistical physics, which are connected to Flow, Computational fluid dynamics and Nuclear reactor. As a part of the same scientific family, Richard T. Lahey mostly works in the field of Two-phase flow, focusing on Turbulent diffusion and, on occasion, Cascade and Flow separation.

Between 2004 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Computation of incompressible bubble dynamics with a stabilized finite element level set method (101 citations)
  • The simulation of multidimensional multiphase flows (73 citations)
  • Theory of supercompression of vapor bubbles and nanoscale thermonuclear fusion (71 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Mechanics
  • Thermodynamics

Richard T. Lahey focuses on Mechanics, Turbulence, Meteorology, Direct numerical simulation and Air entrainment. His Mechanics research integrates issues from Finite element method and Thermodynamics. His studies in Thermodynamics integrate themes in fields like Time domain and Linear stability.

His Turbulence research incorporates themes from Fluid dynamics, Data flow model and Statistical physics. His studies examine the connections between Direct numerical simulation and genetics, as well as such issues in Classical mechanics, with regards to Upwind scheme, Mathematical analysis and Finite difference. The concepts of his Two-phase flow study are interwoven with issues in Bubble fusion, Sonoluminescence, Two-fluid model, Phase velocity and Drag.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow

    S.P. Antal;R.T. Lahey;J.E. Flaherty

  • Evidence for Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation

    R. P. Taleyarkhan;C. D. West;J. S. Cho;R. T. Lahey

  • The thermal hydraulics of a boiling water nuclear reactor

    Richard T. Lahey;F. J. Moody

  • 3-D turbulence structure and phase distribution measurements in bubbly two-phase flows

    S.K. Wang;S.J. Lee;O.C. Jones;R.T. Lahey

  • The virtual mass and lift force on a sphere in rotating and straining inviscid flow

    D.A. Drew;R.T. Lahey

  • THE ANALYSIS OF VIRTUAL MASS EFFECTS IN TWO-PHASE FLOW

    D. Drew;L. Cheng;R.T. Lahey

  • Development of a k-ε Model for Bubbly Two-Phase Flow

    M. Lopez de Bertodano;R. T. Lahey;O. C. Jones

  • Application of general constitutive principles to the derivation of multidimensional two-phase flow equations

    Donald A. Drew;Richard T. Lahey

  • Phase distribution in bubbly two-phase flow in vertical ducts

    M. Lopez de Bertodano;R.T. Lahey;O.C. Jones

  • A polydisperse model for bubbly two-phase flow around a surface ship

    P.M. Carrica;D. Drew;F. Bonetto;R.T. Lahey

  • Lateral forces on spheres in turbulent uniform shear flow

    F.J. Moraga;F.J. Bonetto;R.T. Lahey

  • Phase distribution in complex geometry conduits

    R.T. Lahey;M. Lopez de Bertodano;O.C. Jones

  • Theory of supercompression of vapor bubbles and nanoscale thermonuclear fusion

    Robert I. Nigmatulin;Iskander Sh. Akhatov;Andrey S. Topolnikov;Raisa Kh. Bolotnova

  • Additional evidence of nuclear emissions during acoustic cavitation.

    R. P. Taleyarkhan;J. S. Cho;C. D. West;R. T. Lahey

  • Turbulent bubbly two-phase flow data in a triangular duct

    M. Lopez de Bertodano;R.T. Lahey;O.C. Jones

  • On the development of an objective flow regime indicator

    M.A. Vince;R.T. Lahey

  • The analysis of two-phase flow and heat transfer using a multidimensional, four field, two-fluid model

    Richard T. Lahey;Donald A. Drew

  • The Prediction of Two-Phase Turbulence and Phase Distribution Phenomena Using a Reynolds Stress Model

    M. Lopez de Bertodano;S.-J. Lee;R. T. Lahey;D. A. Drew

  • The use of fractal techniques for flow regime identification

    F. Franca;M. Acikgoz;R.T. Lahey;A. Clausse

  • Computation of incompressible bubble dynamics with a stabilized finite element level set method

    Sunitha Nagrath;Kenneth E. Jansen;Richard T. Lahey

  • Nuclear emissions during self-nucleated acoustic cavitation

    R. P. Taleyarkhan;C. D. West;R. T. Lahey;R. I. Nigmatulin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth E. Jansen
Kenneth E. Jansen University of Colorado Boulder
Jung Sang Cho
Jung Sang Cho Chungbuk National University
Iskander Akhatov
Iskander Akhatov Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Pablo M. Carrica
Pablo M. Carrica University of Iowa
Sanjoy Banerjee
Sanjoy Banerjee City College of New York
Geoffrey F. Hewitt
Geoffrey F. Hewitt Imperial College London
Mark S. Shephard
Mark S. Shephard Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Nancy J. Cooke
Nancy J. Cooke Arizona State University
Mamoru Ishii
Mamoru Ishii Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting opportunities, many students explore related online degrees to diversify their career options. For those interested in the intersection of technology and human behavior, consider accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online programs. These degrees prepare graduates for roles in behavioral health and education, often with flexible study options ideal for working professionals.

If your passion leans toward helping others through counseling, exploring the various types of therapist degrees can help you identify the right educational path. Some programs are designed to be more accessible, such as the easiest degree in counseling, which provides a quicker route to licensure and practice while maintaining quality standards.

For those fascinated by profiling and investigative professions, understanding the educational requirements and job outlook is essential. Research on fbi profiler salary and career pathways reveals that a strong foundation in psychology and criminal justice can lead to fulfilling roles in federal agencies, often commanding competitive salaries.

Exploring these related fields enhances your understanding of diverse career pathways linked to engineering disciplines, offering flexibility and interdisciplinary opportunities for future professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard T. Lahey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles