World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
20866
World Ranking
19383
National Ranking
9649

Mark D. Johnson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 341 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark D. Johnson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

    Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;Colin P. Derdeyn;Tanya N. Turan

  • Characterization of dystrophin in muscle-biopsy specimens from patients with Duchenne's or Becker's muscular dystrophy

    Hoffman Ep;Fischbeck Kh;Brown Rh;Johnson M

  • Aggressive Medical Treatment With or Without Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Intracranial Artery Stenosis (Sammpris): The Final Results of a Randomised Trial

    Colin P. Derdeyn;Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;David Fiorella

  • Early neonatal death in mice homozygous for a null allele of the insulin receptor gene

    Domenico Accili;John Drago;John Drago;Eric J. Lee;Mark D. Johnson;Mark D. Johnson

  • Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study

    Bruce M Biccard;Thandinkosi E Madiba;Hyla-Louise Kluyts;Dolly M Munlemvo

  • Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data

    Weil R. Lai;Mark D. Johnson;Raju Kucherlapati;Peter J. Park

  • Inhibition of angiogenesis by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase.

    Mark D. Johnson;Hyeong‐Reh Choi Kim;Louis Chesler;Gladys Tsao‐Wu

  • Improved diagnosis of Becker muscular dystrophy by dystrophin testing.

    E. P. Hoffman;L. M. Kunkel;C. Angelini;A. Clarke

  • Toxicogenomics-Based Discrimination of Toxic Mechanism in HepG2 Human Hepatoma Cells

    Michael E. Burczynski;Michael McMillian;Joe Ciervo;Li Li

  • Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Primary Glioblastoma Genome

    Jinkuk Kim;Jinkuk Kim;In Hee Lee;Hee Jin Cho;Hee Jin Cho;Chul Kee Park

  • Integrative genome analysis reveals an oncomir/oncogene cluster regulating glioblastoma survivorship

    Hyunsoo Kim;Wei Huang;Xiuli Jiang;Brenton Pennicooke

  • Peripheral stimulation for treatment of trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia and trigeminal posttraumatic neuropathic pain: a pilot study.

    Mark D. Johnson;Kim J. Burchiel

  • T cell development in mice that lack the zeta chain of the T cell antigen receptor complex

    Paul E. Love;Elizabeth W. Shores;Mark D. Johnson;Michel L. Tremblay

  • A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications

    T.E.F. Abbott;T.E.F. Abbott;A.J. Fowler;P. Pelosi;M. Gama de Abreu

  • A Developmental Taxonomy of Glioblastoma Defined and Maintained By MicroRNAs

    Tae-Min Kim;Wei Huang;Richard Park;Peter J. Park

  • Genetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of male infertility: recommendations for genetic counseling and screening

    Mark D Johnson

  • Targeted disruption of the Hexa gene results in mice with biochemical and pathologic features of Tay-Sachs disease.

    Shoji Yamanaka;Mark D. Johnson;Alex Grinberg;Heiner Westphal

  • Copy number variation detection in whole-genome sequencing data using the Bayesian information criterion

    Ruibin Xi;Angela G. Hadjipanayis;Lovelace J. Luquette;Tae-Min Kim

  • The role of the human thalamus in language and memory: evidence from electrophysiological studies

    Mark D. Johnson;George A. Ojemann

  • Integrative genome analysis reveals an oncomir/ oncogene cluster regulating glioblastoma

    Wei Huang;Xiuli Jiang;Peter J. Park;Mark D. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Park
Peter J. Park Harvard University
Alexandra J. Golby
Alexandra J. Golby Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brian M. Alexander
Brian M. Alexander Foundation Medicine
E. Antonio Chiocca
E. Antonio Chiocca Brigham and Women's Hospital
David A. Reardon
David A. Reardon Harvard University
Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
Keith L. Ligon
Keith L. Ligon Harvard University
Peter McL. Black
Peter McL. Black University of British Columbia
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffrey J. Fredberg
Jeffrey J. Fredberg Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine offers a variety of academic routes and professional paths. Many students today consider online degree programs for their flexibility and accessibility, especially for those seeking to balance studies with other commitments.

For registered nurses looking to advance, rn to np programs online provide a streamlined way to transition into advanced practice roles. Similarly, those pursuing nursing but wanting to avoid traditional clinical requirements can explore rn bsn online programs no clinicals, expanding qualifications with added convenience.

Beyond nursing, health care administration is another growing field. Top best mha programs online equip students with leadership and management skills for high-demand administrative roles in medical facilities.

For those interested in disease prevention and wellness, a nutrition bachelor degree online opens career paths in community health, clinical nutrition, and public health education.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you find the best fit for your interests and ambitions in the ever-changing healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles