World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
7380
World Ranking
7265
National Ranking
161

Nicolas Padoy publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Padoy sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 152 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nicolas Padoy D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Padoy sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicolas Padoy is affiliated with the University of Strasbourg in France. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine and computer science, with specific emphasis on surgical applications and medical imaging. Padoy's work spans a variety of main fields, most notably Medicine and Computer Science, and delves into subfields such as Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Oncology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

Their research covers several core topics including Surgical Simulation and Training, Anatomy and Medical Technology, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Medical Imaging and Analysis.

Recent notable publications by Nicolas Padoy include:

  • Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Rendezvous: Attention mechanisms for the recognition of surgical action triplets in endoscopic videos, 2022, Medical Image Analysis
  • Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value, 2022, npj Digital Medicine
  • Computer vision in surgery, 2020, Surgery
  • Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf, 2023, Nature Machine Intelligence

Padoy frequently collaborates with a number of researchers including Pietro Mascagni, Didier Mutter, Deepak Alapatt, Vinkle Srivastav, and Armine Vardazaryan. Collaboration with these co-authors has contributed to a broad output of research papers and projects.

The scholar is often published in key venues within their area of expertise. Their frequent publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
  • Surgical Endoscopy
  • British Journal of Surgery

In addition to journal articles, Nicolas Padoy has contributed to several book publications mainly through Springer Science+Business Media. These contributions mainly consist of multiple editions of "Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2021," which have collectively received numerous citations.

Best Publications

  • EndoNet: A Deep Architecture for Recognition Tasks on Laparoscopic Videos

    Andru P. Twinanda;Sherif Shehata;Didier Mutter;Jacques Marescaux

  • Surgical data science for next-generation interventions.

    Lena Maier-Hein;Swaroop S. Vedula;Stefanie Speidel;Nassir Navab;Nassir Navab

  • Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow.

    Nicolas Padoy;Tobias Blum;Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi;Hubertus Feussner

  • Surgical Data Science - from Concepts toward Clinical Translation

    Lena Maier-Hein;Lena Maier-Hein;Matthias Eisenmann;Duygu Sarikaya;Duygu Sarikaya;Keno März

  • Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning.

    Pietro Mascagni;Armine Vardazaryan;Deepak Alapatt;Takeshi Urade

  • Surgical data science: Enabling next-generation surgery

    Lena Maier-Hein;S. Swaroop Vedula;Stefanie Speidel;Nassir Navab;Nassir Navab

  • Rendezvous: Attention Mechanisms for the Recognition of Surgical Action Triplets in Endoscopic Videos.

    Chinedu Innocent Nwoye;Tong Yu;Cristians Gonzalez;Barbara Seeliger

  • Machine and deep learning for workflow recognition during surgery.

    Nicolas Padoy

  • Weakly supervised convolutional LSTM approach for tool tracking in laparoscopic videos

    Chinedu Innocent Nwoye;Didier Mutter;Jacques Marescaux;Nicolas Padoy

  • Computer vision in surgery.

    Thomas M. Ward;Pietro Mascagni;Yutong Ban;Guy Rosman

  • CAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer-Assisted Interventions

    Tom Vercauteren;Mathias Unberath;Nicolas Padoy;Nassir Navab

  • Human-Machine Collaborative surgery using learned models

    Nicolas Padoy;Gregory D. Hager

  • RSDNet: Learning to Predict Remaining Surgery Duration from Laparoscopic Videos Without Manual Annotations

    Andru Putra Twinanda;Gaurav Yengera;Didier Mutter;Jacques Marescaux

  • Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf

    Unknown

  • On-line recognition of surgical activity for monitoring in the operating room

    N. Padoy;T. Blum;H. Feussner;M-O. Berger

  • Workflow mining for visualization and analysis of surgeries

    Tobias Blum;Nicolas Padoy;Nicolas Padoy;Hubertus Feußner;Nassir Navab

  • Recognition of Instrument-Tissue Interactions in Endoscopic Videos via Action Triplets

    Chinedu Innocent Nwoye;Cristians Gonzalez;Tong Yu;Pietro Mascagni;Pietro Mascagni

  • Multi-task temporal convolutional networks for joint recognition of surgical phases and steps in gastric bypass procedures.

    Sanat Ramesh;Sanat Ramesh;Diego Dall’Alba;Cristians Gonzalez;Tong Yu

  • Workflow monitoring based on 3D motion features

    N. Padoy;D. Mateus;D. Weinland;M-O. Berger

  • SAGES consensus recommendations on an annotation framework for surgical video

    Ozanan R Meireles;Guy Rosman;Guy Rosman;Maria S Altieri;Lawrence Carin

  • Less is More: Surgical Phase Recognition with Less Annotations through Self-Supervised Pre-training of CNN-LSTM Networks

    Gaurav Yengera;Didier Mutter;Jacques Marescaux;Nicolas Padoy

  • Modeling and Online Recognition of Surgical Phases Using Hidden Markov Models

    Tobias Blum;Nicolas Padoy;Hubertus Feußner;Nassir Navab

  • A generalizable approach for multi-view 3D human pose regression

    Abdolrahim Kadkhodamohammadi;Nicolas Padoy

Frequent Co-Authors

Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Jacques Marescaux
Jacques Marescaux University of Strasbourg
Gregory D. Hager
Gregory D. Hager Johns Hopkins University
Pierre Jannin
Pierre Jannin University of Rennes
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Danail Stoyanov
Danail Stoyanov University College London
Stefanie Speidel
Stefanie Speidel National Center for Tumor Diseases
Russell H. Taylor
Russell H. Taylor Johns Hopkins University
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Beat P. Müller-Stich Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree opens the door to various advanced education and career pathways. Many students and professionals seek flexible online degrees that complement their technical backgrounds while expanding leadership or specialized skills.

For those interested in business leadership, an online emba can strengthen managerial expertise and global business acumen. If you’re drawn to information management or digital archives, consider the cheapest mlis degree online to enhance your knowledge in library and information science.

Affordability and flexibility are top concerns for graduate education. Explore the cheapest online masters in a wide variety of fields, ensuring you can advance your career without financial strain. For professionals aiming at leadership in organizational contexts, a doctorate organizational leadership provides the training needed to influence change and manage teams at the highest levels.

Each of these pathways can support and enhance a career launched by studying Computer Science in the USA, offering room for specialization, advancement, and career diversity.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas Padoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles