World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5288
World Ranking
13488
National Ranking
351

Mathieu Lamard publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathieu Lamard sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 122 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mathieu Lamard D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathieu Lamard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathieu Lamard is affiliated with the University of Western Brittany in France and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Medicine and Computer Science. Their work predominantly spans areas such as Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Artificial Intelligence, with notable emphasis on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition as well as Health Information Management.

The research topics covered include:

  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • AI in cancer detection
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases

Lamard has published numerous scientific papers, some of which include:

  • "Automatic detection of rare pathologies in fundus photographs using few-shot learning," 2020, Medical Image Analysis
  • "A review of deep learning-based information fusion techniques for multimodal medical image classification," 2024, Computers in Biology and Medicine
  • "ExplAIn: Explanatory artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis," 2021, Medical Image Analysis
  • "Towards improved breast mass detection using dual-view mammogram matching," 2021, Medical Image Analysis
  • "Two-stage multi-scale breast mass segmentation for full mammogram analysis without user intervention," 2021, Journal of Applied Biomedicine

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Gwenolé Quellec, Pierre-Henri Conze, Béatrice Cochener, Mostafa El Habib Daho, and Ramin Tadayoni.

Their scientific output has been published in various venues with multiple contributions, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine

Best Publications

  • Retinopathy Online Challenge: Automatic Detection of Microaneurysms in Digital Color Fundus Photographs

    Meindert Niemeijer;Bram van Ginneken;Michael J Cree;Atsushi Mizutani

  • TeleOphta: Machine learning and image processing methods for teleophthalmology

    E. Decencière;G. Cazuguel;G. Cazuguel;X. Zhang;G. Thibault

  • Deep image mining for diabetic retinopathy screening.

    Gwenolé Quellec;Katia Charrière;Yassine Boudi;Béatrice Cochener

  • Automated Analysis of Retinal Images for Detection of Referable Diabetic Retinopathy

    Michael D. Abràmoff;James C. Folk;Dennis P. Han;Jonathan D. Walker

  • Optimal Wavelet Transform for the Detection of Microaneurysms in Retina Photographs

    G. Quellec;M. Lamard;P.M. Josselin;G. Cazuguel

  • Exudate detection in color retinal images for mass screening of diabetic retinopathy

    Xiwei Zhang;Guillaume Thibault;Etienne Decencière;Beatriz Marcotegui

  • Wavelet optimization for content-based image retrieval in medical databases.

    Gwénolé Quellec;Gwénolé Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Mathieu Lamard;Guy Cazuguel;Guy Cazuguel;Béatrice Cochener;Béatrice Cochener

  • Multiple-Instance Learning for Medical Image and Video Analysis

    Gwenole Quellec;Guy Cazuguel;Beatrice Cochener;Mathieu Lamard

  • A Comparative Evaluation of a New Generation of Diffractive Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

    Beatrice Cochener;Guillaume Boutillier;Mathieu Lamard;Claire Auberger-Zagnoli

  • A multiple-instance learning framework for diabetic retinopathy screening

    Gwénolé Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Mathieu Lamard;Michael D. Abràmoff;Etienne Decencière

  • Adaptive Nonseparable Wavelet Transform via Lifting and its Application to Content-Based Image Retrieval

    G. Quellec;M. Lamard;G. Cazuguel;B. Cochener

  • Fast Wavelet-Based Image Characterization for Highly Adaptive Image Retrieval

    G. Quellec;M. Lamard;G. Cazuguel;B. Cochener

  • CATARACTS: Challenge on automatic tool annotation for cataRACT surgery

    Hassan Al Hajj;Mathieu Lamard;Pierre-Henri Conze;Soumali Roychowdhury

  • Automatic detection of rare pathologies in fundus photographs using few-shot learning.

    Gwenolé Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Pierre-Henri Conze;Pascale Massin

  • Multiple-Instance Learning for Anomaly Detection in Digital Mammography

    Gwenole Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Michel Cozic;Gouenou Coatrieux

  • Content Based Image Retrieval based on Wavelet Transform coefficients distribution

    M. Lamard;G. Cazuguel;G. Quellec;L. Bekri

  • Monitoring tool usage in surgery videos using boosted convolutional and recurrent neural networks.

    Hassan Al Hajj;Mathieu Lamard;Pierre-Henri Conze;Béatrice Cochener

  • Case Retrieval in Medical Databases by Fusing Heterogeneous Information

    Gwénolé Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Guy Cazuguel;Christian Roux

  • Real-Time Segmentation and Recognition of Surgical Tasks in Cataract Surgery Videos

    Gwenole Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Beatrice Cochener;Guy Cazuguel

  • Real-Time Task Recognition in Cataract Surgery Videos Using Adaptive Spatiotemporal Polynomials

    Gwenole Quellec;Mathieu Lamard;Beatrice Cochener;Guy Cazuguel

  • ExplAIn: Explanatory artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis

    Gwenolé Quellec;Hassan Al Hajj;Mathieu Lamard;Pierre-Henri Conze

  • A Low Distorsion and Reversible Watermark: Application to Angiographic Images of the Retina

    G. Coatrieux;M. Lamard;W. Daccache;W. Puentes

  • Towards improved breast mass detection using dual-view mammogram matching

    Yutong Yan;Pierre-Henri Conze;Mathieu Lamard;Gwenolé Quellec

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Roux
Christian Roux Institut Mines-Télécom
Gouenou Coatrieux
Gouenou Coatrieux IMT Atlantique
Pascale Massin
Pascale Massin Université Paris Cité
Christian Roux
Christian Roux Université Paris Cité
Michael D. Abràmoff
Michael D. Abràmoff University of Iowa
Meindert Niemeijer
Meindert Niemeijer Digital Diagnostics Inc.
Fakhri Karray
Fakhri Karray Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Roberto Hornero
Roberto Hornero University of Valladolid

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology reshapes education, more students are turning to flexible online associate degree programs in computer science and related fields. These programs offer foundational knowledge and can be a stepping stone for further study or entry-level tech jobs.

For those seeking affordable options, exploring the cheapest online college choices can help manage costs while still earning a quality degree. This is especially useful for international students and adults looking to switch careers without taking on major debt.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, don’t worry. There are best colleges for low gpa applicants, offering opportunities to learn and grow, regardless of your past performance.

Finally, computer science skills open doors to multiple fields. For those interested in blending technology and sustainability, consider how your background can lead to jobs for environmental science majors. Tech expertise is valuable and adaptable—making your career pathways broad and exciting.

Best Scientists Citing Mathieu Lamard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles