What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Botany
- Enzyme
- Biochemistry
Peter Proksch mainly focuses on Stereochemistry, Botany, Sponge, Biochemistry and Microbiology.
His work deals with themes such as Biological activity, Fungi imperfecti, Antibacterial agent and Organic chemistry, which intersect with Stereochemistry.
Peter Proksch combines subjects such as Antimicrobial and Mangrove with his study of Botany.
The various areas that Peter Proksch examines in his Sponge study include Ecology, Marine invertebrates, Chemical defense and Fungus.
His Biochemistry study incorporates themes from Cell culture and Orthosiphon aristatus.
His Microbiology research includes elements of Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis, 16S ribosomal RNA, Bacteria and Sonneratia alba.
His most cited work include:
- Drugs from the seas – current status and microbiological implications (444 citations)
- Fungal endophytes from higher plants: a prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products (420 citations)
- Fungal endophytes: unique plant inhabitants with great promises (344 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Stereochemistry, Botany, Sponge, Biochemistry and Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy are his primary areas of study.
His studies deal with areas such as Organic chemistry, Fungus and Cytotoxicity as well as Stereochemistry.
In his research on the topic of Cytotoxicity, Apoptosis is strongly related with Cell culture.
His research combines Mangrove and Botany.
Many of his studies on Sponge apply to Alkaloid as well.
He is interested in Kinase, which is a branch of Biochemistry.
He most often published in these fields:
- Stereochemistry (45.59%)
- Botany (26.21%)
- Sponge (17.52%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Stereochemistry (45.59%)
- Fungus (11.43%)
- Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (13.04%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Peter Proksch mainly investigates Stereochemistry, Fungus, Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Cytotoxicity and Absolute configuration.
Peter Proksch has included themes like Antibacterial activity, Fermentation, Sponge and Endophytic fungus in his Stereochemistry study.
His Fungus study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Botany.
His works in Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense and Endophyte are all subjects of inquiry into Botany.
He has researched Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in several fields, including Derivative, Cytotoxic T cell, Natural product and Mouse Lymphoma.
His Cytotoxicity research is within the category of Biochemistry.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Metabolites from the Fungal Endophyte Aspergillus austroafricanus in Axenic Culture and in Fungal–Bacterial Mixed Cultures (48 citations)
- Inducing secondary metabolite production by the endophytic fungus Chaetomium sp. through fungal–bacterial co-culture and epigenetic modification (43 citations)
- Bioactive secondary metabolites with multiple activities from a fungal endophyte. (42 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Botany
- Enzyme
- Organic chemistry
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Stereochemistry, Fungus, Cytotoxicity, Absolute configuration and Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
His Stereochemistry research includes themes of Fermentation, Aspergillus versicolor and Endophytic fungus.
His Fungus study contributes to a more complete understanding of Botany.
The Botany study combines topics in areas such as Biodiversity hotspot and Mangrove ecosystem.
His work carried out in the field of Cytotoxicity brings together such families of science as Cell culture, Ic50 values, Food science, Bioassay and Polyketide.
His Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy research incorporates elements of Amorpha fruticosa, Enantiomer, Resokaempferol and Mass spectrometry.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
