What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Biochemistry, Suberites domuncula, Sponge spicule, Sponge and Biophysics.
His Biochemistry study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Cell culture.
Heinz C. Schröder has researched Suberites domuncula in several fields, including Suberites, Demosponge, Microbiology, Complementary DNA and Cell biology.
His Sponge spicule study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Nanotechnology and Silicate.
Heinz C. Schröder focuses mostly in the field of Sponge, narrowing it down to matters related to Gene expression and, in some cases, Metallothionein.
His Biophysics study combines topics in areas such as Protein filament, Photochemistry, Photosensitizer and Protoporphyrin IX, Photodynamic therapy.
His most cited work include:
- Expression of silicatein and collagen genes in the marine sponge Suberites domuncula is controlled by silicate and myotrophin. (272 citations)
- Biofabrication of biosilica-glass by living organisms (170 citations)
- gp120 of HIV-1 induces apoptosis in rat cortical cell cultures: prevention by memantine. (159 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Biochemistry, Sponge, Molecular biology, Suberites domuncula and Sponge spicule.
His Sponge research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ecology and Gene.
Heinz C. Schröder has included themes like Gene expression, Virus, Virology, RNA and Messenger RNA in his Molecular biology study.
The various areas that Heinz C. Schröder examines in his Suberites domuncula study include Suberites, Demosponge, Microbiology, Anatomy and Cell biology.
His work in Cell biology covers topics such as In vitro which are related to areas like In vivo.
His research integrates issues of Biophysics and Nanotechnology in his study of Sponge spicule.
He most often published in these fields:
- Biochemistry (33.09%)
- Sponge (22.06%)
- Molecular biology (18.87%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Polyphosphate (11.76%)
- Biochemistry (33.09%)
- Biophysics (11.52%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Polyphosphate, Biochemistry, Biophysics, Sponge and Calcium.
The Polyphosphate study combines topics in areas such as Tissue engineering, In vitro, Wound healing, Nanoparticle and Coacervate.
In his work, Anatomy is strongly intertwined with Matrix, which is a subfield of Biophysics.
Heinz C. Schröder studies Suberites domuncula which is a part of Sponge.
The concepts of his Suberites domuncula study are interwoven with issues in Demosponge, Suberites and Substrate.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Calcium carbonate and Phosphate in addition to Calcium.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Engineering a morphogenetically active hydrogel for bioprinting of bioartificial tissue derived from human osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells. (110 citations)
- Bioactive and biodegradable silica biomaterial for bone regeneration (69 citations)
- 3D printing of hybrid biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: Calcium-polyphosphate microparticles encapsulated by polycaprolactone. (57 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Heinz C. Schröder mostly deals with Biochemistry, Polyphosphate, Saos-2 cells, Biophysics and Tissue engineering.
Heinz C. Schröder combines Biochemistry and Ascorbic acid in his research.
His Polyphosphate research includes elements of Amorphous solid and Mineralization.
His Biophysics research also works with subjects such as
- Calcium which connect with Phosphate and Bone regeneration,
- Cell growth which intersects with area such as MC3T3 and Collagen, type I, alpha 1.
His study looks at the intersection of Enzyme and topics like Bone formation with Sponge spicule and Nanotechnology.
His study in the fields of Spicule under the domain of Sponge spicule overlaps with other disciplines such as New horizons.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
