What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of study are Biochemistry, Suberites domuncula, Sponge, Sponge spicule and Molecular biology.
His work is connected to Enzyme, Polymerase, RNA, DNA and DNA polymerase, as a part of Biochemistry.
His studies deal with areas such as Demosponge, Phylum, Microbiology and Cell biology as well as Suberites domuncula.
Werner E.G. Müller has researched Sponge in several fields, including Ecology, Receptor tyrosine kinase and Glycoprotein.
His Sponge spicule research incorporates themes from Nanotechnology and Biomineralization.
His Molecular biology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Complementary DNA and Antibody.
His most cited work include:
- Oligosaccharide specificity of galectins: a search by frontal affinity chromatography. (751 citations)
- Interactions of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acids. 1. The influence of heteroatoms and polarizability on the base specificity of intercalating ligands. (294 citations)
- Interactions of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acids. A - T-specific non-intercalating DNA ligands. (242 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Werner E.G. Müller mainly focuses on Biochemistry, Sponge, Molecular biology, Suberites domuncula and Stereochemistry.
His Geodia research extends to Biochemistry, which is thematically connected.
His studies examine the connections between Sponge and genetics, as well as such issues in Sponge spicule, with regards to Nanotechnology and Biophysics.
His Molecular biology research includes themes of Polymerase, DNA, DNA polymerase, RNA and Messenger RNA.
His Suberites domuncula study incorporates themes from Demosponge, Suberites, Anatomy and Cell biology.
The Stereochemistry study which covers Cytotoxicity that intersects with Cell culture.
He most often published in these fields:
- Biochemistry (30.19%)
- Sponge (20.50%)
- Molecular biology (19.88%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Stereochemistry (10.68%)
- Biochemistry (30.19%)
- Sponge (20.50%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stereochemistry, Biochemistry, Sponge, Cytotoxicity and Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy are his primary areas of study.
His research investigates the connection with Stereochemistry and areas like Fungus which intersect with concerns in Fermentation.
His Biochemistry study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Calcium.
He studies Suberites domuncula which is a part of Sponge.
His Suberites domuncula study which covers Cell biology that intersects with Bone morphogenetic protein 2 and Suberites.
His study looks at the relationship between Sponge spicule and topics such as Nanotechnology, which overlap with Biomineralization.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Disulfide- and multisulfide-containing metabolites from marine organisms. (100 citations)
- Flexible Minerals: Self-Assembled Calcite Spicules with Extreme Bending Strength (86 citations)
- Bio-silica and bio-polyphosphate: applications in biomedicine (bone formation) (82 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Werner E.G. Müller focuses on Biochemistry, Stereochemistry, Nanotechnology, Sponge spicule and Tissue engineering.
He works mostly in the field of Biochemistry, limiting it down to topics relating to Calcium and, in certain cases, Biophysics.
His work deals with themes such as Mouse Lymphoma, Sponge, Murine lymphoma and Cytotoxicity, which intersect with Stereochemistry.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Oxide, Silicon and Refractive index in addition to Sponge.
His study on Sponge spicule also encompasses disciplines like
- Biomineralization which is related to area like Suberites domuncula,
- Calcareous sponge which intersects with area such as Flexural strength, Amorphous solid, Sycon and Osteoclast.
His Polyphosphate research includes elements of Intracellular and Cell biology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
