World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
53
Citations
9156
World Ranking
3337
National Ranking
1178

Jeffrey C. Drazen publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Drazen sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 178 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jeffrey C. Drazen D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey C. Drazen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey C. Drazen is affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on subfields such as Ecology, Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, including Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Marine and fisheries research, Marine animal studies overview, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Ichthyology and Marine Biology, and Mercury impact and mitigation studies.

Recent publications by Jeffrey C. Drazen illustrate their engagement with marine and environmental research challenges. Notable papers include:

  • Midwater ecosystems must be considered when evaluating environmental risks of deep-sea mining (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Assessment of scientific gaps related to the effective environmental management of deep-seabed mining (2022, Marine Policy)
  • Climate change considerations are fundamental to management of deep-sea resource extraction (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Deep-Sea Misconceptions Cause Underestimation of Seabed-Mining Impacts (2020, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  • Environment, ecology, and potential effectiveness of an area protected from deep-sea mining (Clarion Clipperton Zone, abyssal Pacific) (2021, Progress In Oceanography)

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Jeffrey C. Drazen include Brian N. Popp, Craig R. Smith, Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson, Astrid B. Leitner, and Joel D. Blum.

The scientist's research has appeared regularly in several publication venues, notable among which are Frontiers in Marine Science, Progress In Oceanography, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Deep Sea Research Part I Oceanographic Research Papers, and Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office.

Best Publications

  • The rate of metabolism in marine animals: environmental constraints, ecological demands and energetic opportunities

    Brad A Seibel;Jeffrey C Drazen

  • Methylmercury production below the mixed layer in the North Pacific Ocean

    Joel D. Blum;Brian N. Popp;Jeffrey C. Drazen;C. Anela Choy

  • A global biogeographic classification of the mesopelagic zone

    Tracey T. Sutton;Malcolm R. Clark;Daniel C. Dunn;Patrick N. Halpin

  • Plastic for dinner? Observations of frequent debris ingestion by pelagic predatory fishes from the central North Pacific

    CA Choy;JC Drazen

  • Near-island biological hotspots in barren ocean basins

    Jamison M. Gove;Margaret A. McManus;Anna B. Neuheimer;Jeffrey J. Polovina

  • Marine fish may be biochemically constrained from inhabiting the deepest ocean depths

    Paul H. Yancey;Mackenzie E. Gerringer;Mackenzie E. Gerringer;Jeffrey C. Drazen;Ashley A. Rowden

  • Assessment of scientific gaps related to the effective environmental management of deep-seabed mining

    Unknown

  • The influence of depth on mercury levels in pelagic fishes and their prey

    C. Anela Choy;Brian N. Popp;J. John Kaneko;Jeffrey C. Drazen

  • Dining in the Deep: The Feeding Ecology of Deep-Sea Fishes.

    Jeffrey C. Drazen;Tracey T. Sutton

  • Midwater zooplankton and suspended particle dynamics in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre: A stable isotope perspective

    Cecelia C. S. Hannides;Cecelia C. S. Hannides;Brian N. Popp;C. Anela Choy;Jeffrey C. Drazen

  • Opinion: Midwater ecosystems must be considered when evaluating environmental risks of deep-sea mining

    Jeffrey C. Drazen;Craig R. Smith;Kristina M. Gjerde;Steven H. D. Haddock

  • Digestive chitinolytic activity in marine fishes of Monterey Bay, California.

    Magdalena A. Gutowska;Jeffrey C. Drazen;Bruce H. Robison

  • The distribution of benthic biomass in hadal trenches: a modelling approach to investigate the effect of vertical and lateral organic matter transport to the seafloor

    Matteo C. Ichino;Matteo C. Ichino;Malcolm R. Clark;Jeffrey C. Drazen;Alan Jamieson

  • Trophic position estimates of marine teleosts using amino acid compound specific isotopic analysis

    Christina J. Bradley;Natalie J. Wallsgrove;C. Anela Choy;Jeffrey C. Drazen

  • Trophic structure and food resources of epipelagic and mesopelagic fishes in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre ecosystem inferred from nitrogen isotopic compositions

    C. Anela Choy;C. Anela Choy;Brian N. Popp;Cecelia C. S. Hannides;Jeffrey C. Drazen

  • Depth‐related trends in metabolism of benthic and benthopelagic deep‐sea fishes

    Jeffrey C. Drazen;Brad A. Seibel

  • Sediment community response to a temporally varying food supply at an abyssal station in the NE pacific

    Jeffrey C. Drazen;Roberta J. Baldwin;Kenneth L. Smith

  • Global trophic position comparison of two dominant mesopelagic fish families (Myctophidae, Stomiidae) using amino acid nitrogen isotopic analyses.

    C. Anela Choy;Peter C. Davison;Jeffrey C. Drazen;Adrian Flynn;Adrian Flynn

  • Bypassing the abyssal benthic food web: Macrourid diet in the eastern North Pacific inferred from stomach content and stable isotopes analyses

    Jeffrey C. Drazen;Brian N. Popp;C. Anela Choy;Tara Clemente

  • Lipid, sterols and fatty acid composition of abyssal holothurians and ophiuroids from the North-East Pacific Ocean: Food web implications

    Jeffrey C. Drazen;Charles F. Phleger;Charles F. Phleger;Michaela A. Guest;Peter D. Nichols;Peter D. Nichols

  • Fishes of the hadal zone including new species, in situ observations and depth records of Liparidae

    Thomas D. Linley;Mackenzie E. Gerringer;Paul H. Yancey;Jeffrey C. Drazen

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian N. Popp
Brian N. Popp University of Hawaii at Manoa
Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson
Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson University of South Carolina
Joel D. Blum
Joel D. Blum University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Malcolm R. Clark
Malcolm R. Clark National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Les Watling
Les Watling University of Hawaii at Manoa
Craig R. Smith
Craig R. Smith University of Hawaii at Manoa
Timothy M. Shank
Timothy M. Shank Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Bruce H. Robison
Bruce H. Robison Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
James P. Barry
James P. Barry Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Ashley A. Rowden
Ashley A. Rowden Victoria University of Wellington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a background in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of allied degree options and career pathways. Many students consider advancing their credentials through flexible online programs. If you’re interested in the intersection of biology and healthcare, reviewing the top rated online nursing schools wgu is a great start for entering the fast-growing nursing field.

For those aiming to take on advanced nursing leadership or research roles, exploring bsn to msn online programs can help bridge undergraduate and graduate studies. These programs provide the knowledge base necessary for integrating ecological perspectives into public health and policy.

When choosing a pathway, many students prefer institutions with strong ethical standards and stable reputations. Researching non profit colleges ensures your education is valued by future employers and focused on student success.

Additionally, for veterans or active-duty personnel, exploring the best online colleges for military can help identify institutions that offer robust support services and tailored academic options.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey C. Drazen

Trending Scientists